Live data from Hacker News

Disqus, a dark commenting system

web.archive.org

171–180 of 271 posts

Re: Disqus, a dark commenting system

#171
post #130

Is there a good alternative that it is easy to migrate to from Disqus? I dont want to lose all the comments that I had on my blog.

I can help you migrate your comments into Remarkbox (founder).

I used to be able to import users but they stopped exporting email addresses from the disqus XML.

So instead I import user surrogates.

Reach out directly, Remarkbox is free now!

Re: Disqus, a dark commenting system

#172
post #134

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> all you need is an app like AntennaPod To listen to a podcast? A podcast is an audio file you download like any other file and play like any other audio file. Why do you need a dedicated app?

As all the successful technology, convenience.

What SSLy said. For the same reason I have a single app which plays all my shoutcast streams with one button click, the same reason I don't type SMTP/IMAP commands manually or read RSS feed xml with in vim. These are not "Dedicated apps", they are generically useful software applications. Spotify is a Dedicated App.

Re: Disqus, a dark commenting system

#174

Shameless plug: My friend and I are building a federated commenting system on top of Matrix if anyone is interested. You control the data, your users choose where they want to be signed up, and the system will not disappear overnight because a company decides to discontinue it. And of course there are no trackers/pixels. This is a hobby project that we're launching in three weeks. If you are interested, come talk to…

That's pretty interesting. I will check it out. Thanks for sharing. :D

Re: Disqus, a dark commenting system

#175

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Can I ask an honest question: Why do you want to allow random people to leave comments on your blog and be responsible for them? I just don't see the value and feel that it just adds technical and security overhead, invites spam, and possibly the need to waste time moderating trash comments. Many blogs that I have visited which demonstrate or explain something technical with a comment section has: spam, accolades suc…

>Want to leave me a comment? Email me or go away. The common alternative these days is to have no comment section on your blog, but to post your blog posts to Twitter/Reddit/etc and have the discussion there. That still builds community and drives traffic to your blog, but with greater potential network effects, and no tech/security overhead or need to be responsible for rando's comments.

You make a good point I should have added. Outsource the community to an external platform and let someone else handle the comments, spam, moderation, etc.

Re: Disqus, a dark commenting system

#176

I have (had) a Disqus account that I connected to via my google account. I say had because I haven't been able to login in a year or so via firefox. I just get a page that says "There was an error submitting the form. If you're having difficulty, try repeating the action on https://disqus.com " with an annoying meme gift on the background. Luckily the title of the page says "Embed: CSRF verification failed (403)" but…

I also have a Disqus account and at some point it got flagged (incorrectly) for spam. I've emailed them and asked in their forums for it to be fixed but apparently it isn't something they will fix.

Re: Disqus, a dark commenting system

#177
Disqus was the default commenting system for a Ghost blog theme I purchased for my humble website. It actually broke my site's functionality by directing users who had made comments to really shady advertisements. You can see a screen recording of the behavior here: https://keeganleary.com/disqus-is-evil-trash/

I switched out for ComentBox and let the theme designer know about the issue. I will also forward him this article and have a look at some of the other comment systems provided! Thanks!

Re: Disqus, a dark commenting system

#178

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Shoutcast/Icecast are alive and well, there are thousands of independent radio stations online; one of the most well known (SomaFM) is alive and well, ad free listener supported. Big Sonic Heaven is still online, both of these are like 20 years and running. Lots of podcasts are free from their source, Spotify doesn't even offer one of favorite ones (a weekly DJ mix, 500+ episodes strong) all you need is an app like A…

> all you need is an app like AntennaPod To listen to a podcast? A podcast is an audio file you download like any other file and play like any other audio file. Why do you need a dedicated app?

On many podcasts now, this is increasingly obfuscated or hidden:

- There is no dedicated podcast homepage, only a set of service links (Spotify, Itunes, etc.).

- RSS itself may not be provided.

- Audio is hidden inside Javascript requests.

I do listen to many podcasts by going to a page and finding the single-episode download link,and playing that directly via mpv or other CLI tools. Success rate is falling, seems to be ~75% or so anecdotally. Often I'll curl the page, explode elements to one per line, and grep for '\.mp3' references. Even that fails often.

And yes, I use dedicated podcast apps to subscribe specifically, but I don't want or need to subscribe to every last podcast just to listen to a single episode.

Open standards promote interoperability. Profit comes by building walls and moats.

Profit seems to be winning.

Re: Disqus, a dark commenting system

#179
post #170

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Some people are proud of their work and they want to show it to others. The more people see it and appreciate it, the more validated and important the creators feel. It's like sending invitations to your birthday party. It feels bad when just one person shows up. > They need sincere search engines, that's all. What exactly are you suggesting to the content creators?

> The more people see it and appreciate it, the more validated and important the creators feel. That is called vanity in one word. > What exactly are you suggesting to the content creators? If it really is a hobby, one enjoys it on it's own. The "showcase" part shouldn't be essential for one to take joy in the process. My recommendation is to find a space where one can share what they achieved, but it really doesn't…

Sharing your hobby with as many others as possible, hoping maybe more people join the fun is not vanity. The birthday party analogy has validity too.

Re: Disqus, a dark commenting system

#180
post #66

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Yeah, I think the problem with self-hosting vs. Medium is that it is harder for the authors to reach a large audience. I mean, even if you don't want to make money from your cool project or tutorial or whatever, you still want people to see it. But man, I really hate Medium.

the problem with self-hosting vs. Medium is that it is harder for the authors to reach a large audience. Isn't this is a problem that search engines were intended to solve? Before they went into the ad business, I mean?

People seem to stream more than they'll search.

Google's daily search stats are getting harder to find, but with 3.8 billion Internet users and probably a few billion searches/day, it's likely single-digit searches per person per day, as a mean.

Algorithmic/stream discovery, as on Facebook, or HN, is at least an order of magnitude higher.

https://ardorseo.com/blog/how-many-google-searches-per-day/

Post reply on HN