What will we do if apple restricts the installation to only signed apps and brew no longer works?
Homebrew 3.0
11–20 of 516 posts
Re: Homebrew 3.0
#12/me searches changelog for "`brew update` now runs asynchronously and doesn't block the process to install a 3 year-old package." Dismayed, I do not find it. Asynchronous formula updates would IMO save the most Mac man-years of almost any macOS tool.
Optimizations to brew would save many many watthours. If I were to guess, it would be over a MWh per year.
Re: Homebrew 3.0
#13Thanks for doing homebrew -- been using it for years!
Re: Homebrew 3.0
#14I can’t even begin to imagine how much value Max Howell (creator of Homebrew) has added to the world. It’s the recommended package manager at every place I’ve worked at and saves so much headache. I use Linux at home and package managers like AUR are great, but macOS is where the users are.
I don't think homebrew has more user than say apt or pacman. Maybe there are a bit more people running osx than linux, but much of them are not devs or "power users" and never run homebrew.
Pacman, erm what? Arc is a niche of a niche. I'd bet Alpine's package manager sees more action than that - let alone yum/rpm.
Re: Homebrew 3.0
#15Thanks for doing homebrew -- been using it for years!
Re: Homebrew 3.0
#16I can’t even begin to imagine how much value Max Howell (creator of Homebrew) has added to the world. It’s the recommended package manager at every place I’ve worked at and saves so much headache. I use Linux at home and package managers like AUR are great, but macOS is where the users are.
Was it him who was turned down by Apple and Google, after he built homebrew...?
Re: Homebrew 3.0
#17I can’t even begin to imagine how much value Max Howell (creator of Homebrew) has added to the world. It’s the recommended package manager at every place I’ve worked at and saves so much headache. I use Linux at home and package managers like AUR are great, but macOS is where the users are.
I don't think homebrew has more user than say apt or pacman. Maybe there are a bit more people running osx than linux, but much of them are not devs or "power users" and never run homebrew.
Re: Homebrew 3.0
#18What will we do if apple restricts the installation to only signed apps and brew no longer works?
Re: Homebrew 3.0
#19I can’t even begin to imagine how much value Max Howell (creator of Homebrew) has added to the world. It’s the recommended package manager at every place I’ve worked at and saves so much headache. I use Linux at home and package managers like AUR are great, but macOS is where the users are.
Re: Homebrew 3.0
#20Earlier quoted context omitted.
I don't think homebrew has more user than say apt or pacman. Maybe there are a bit more people running osx than linux, but much of them are not devs or "power users" and never run homebrew.
Does it make homebrew less valuable if there are other package managers for other OS’s that have more users?