Live data from Hacker News

Stepping Down as CEO of the Wikimedia Foundation

diff.wikimedia.org

1–10 of 252 posts

Re: Stepping Down as CEO of the Wikimedia Foundation

#3

I didn't know my Wikipedia donations funded parties in Accra, Berlin and Chandigarh. I think that should be been in the fundraising statement.

For profit entities use parties to bond teams and accomplish a goal. Non profit entities ought to have that freedom as well.

Re: Stepping Down as CEO of the Wikimedia Foundation

#4

I didn't know my Wikipedia donations funded parties in Accra, Berlin and Chandigarh. I think that should be been in the fundraising statement.

For profit entities use parties to bond teams and accomplish a goal. Non profit entities ought to have that freedom as well.

They are welcome to, just declare it upfront.

Re: Stepping Down as CEO of the Wikimedia Foundation

#5

I didn't know my Wikipedia donations funded parties in Accra, Berlin and Chandigarh. I think that should be been in the fundraising statement.

Yeah, I wish there were a way to support just Wikipedia. I don't really care about a lot of Wikimedia Foundation's other pet projects, but the way they phrase their banners and emails, you'd think we are always a razor's edge from Wikipedia servers shutting off...

Re: Stepping Down as CEO of the Wikimedia Foundation

#6

I didn't know my Wikipedia donations funded parties in Accra, Berlin and Chandigarh. I think that should be been in the fundraising statement.

For profit entities use parties to bond teams and accomplish a goal. Non profit entities ought to have that freedom as well.

[deleted]

Re: Stepping Down as CEO of the Wikimedia Foundation

#8

Earlier quoted context omitted.

For profit entities use parties to bond teams and accomplish a goal. Non profit entities ought to have that freedom as well.

They are welcome to, just declare it upfront.

Do shareholding and dividend statements generally say such things upfront?

Re: Stepping Down as CEO of the Wikimedia Foundation

#9

Earlier quoted context omitted.

For profit entities use parties to bond teams and accomplish a goal. Non profit entities ought to have that freedom as well.

They are welcome to, just declare it upfront.

I have a hard time imagining something more destructive to the ability to run an organization than putting forward all managerial initiatives for public consent, just in case some portion of the public disagrees with that choice. Talk about design by committee.

Re: Stepping Down as CEO of the Wikimedia Foundation

#10

I didn't know my Wikipedia donations funded parties in Accra, Berlin and Chandigarh. I think that should be been in the fundraising statement.

Sadly just like Mozilla. Most of these charities are a lavish waste.

Yeah, afaik firefox development is carried out by mozilla corporation (the for-profit subsidiary of mozilla), but your donations goes to mozilla foundation, which spends the money on "advocacy".
Post reply on HN