Live data from Hacker News

New Algorithm Impressively Depixelates Pixel Art

geekosystem.com

11–20 of 32 posts

Re: New Algorithm Impressively Depixelates Pixel Art

#11
Though I mostly understand how much of a different algorithm it is, its results are surprisingly similar to hq4x. It sort of looks like a vectorized form - edges are smoothed better, but everything is excessively curvy (seriously, there are almost no corners anywhere). Not quite, as vectorized forms of images tend to mess up horrifically on some corner-meetings (examples of which are in the paper). Which this doesn't seem to do - very impressive!

Does anyone know what hq4x does to the Doom picture? I'd be interested in comparing edge-cases like that, especially as it seems hq4x would handle it decently well, while this algorithm does pretty poorly. Understandably so, but I wonder if it can be adapted to handle broader blending forms.

Re: New Algorithm Impressively Depixelates Pixel Art

#12
post #9

Dup: http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=2578706 (59 points, 19 comments) talks about the same paper.

This is the first I've heard of it. So I'm happy for the dupe.

Look at http://news.ycombinator.com/best or http://www.daemonology.net/hn-daily if you want to catch up.

Re: New Algorithm Impressively Depixelates Pixel Art

#16
post #8

What are the possible applications of this algorithm?

DECKARD: Enhance 224 to 176. Enhance, stop. Move in, stop. Pull out, track right, stop. Center in, pull back. Stop. Track 45 right. Stop. Center and stop. Enhance 34 to 36. Pan right and pull back. Stop. Enhance 34 to 46. Pull back. Wait a minute, go right, stop. Enhance 57 to 19. Track 45 left. Stop. Enhance 15 to 23. Give me a hard copy right there.

Re: New Algorithm Impressively Depixelates Pixel Art

#17
something like this already existed and it produced very similar results.

hmmm. wikipedia turns up many http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_raster_to_vector_... but the one i was thinking of was potrace - http://potrace.sourceforge.net/

i've used potrace many times before - it works really well (i once hand-wrote some "powerpoint" slides, scanned them, then used potrace to make them appear "natural" - people thought i had made a font based on my handwriting!)

maybe it's the handling of colour that's new here? potrace only does monochrome images, as far as i know.

Re: New Algorithm Impressively Depixelates Pixel Art

#19

something like this already existed and it produced very similar results. hmmm. wikipedia turns up many http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_raster_to_vector_... but the one i was thinking of was potrace - http://potrace.sourceforge.net/ i've used potrace many times before - it works really well (i once hand-wrote some "powerpoint" slides, scanned them, then used potrace to make them appear "natural" - people t…

http://research.microsoft.com/en-us/um/people/kopf/pixelart/...

Re: New Algorithm Impressively Depixelates Pixel Art

#20
post #19

something like this already existed and it produced very similar results. hmmm. wikipedia turns up many http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_raster_to_vector_... but the one i was thinking of was potrace - http://potrace.sourceforge.net/ i've used potrace many times before - it works really well (i once hand-wrote some "powerpoint" slides, scanned them, then used potrace to make them appear "natural" - people t…

http://research.microsoft.com/en-us/um/people/kopf/pixelart/...

ah! thanks.
Post reply on HN