Earlier quoted context omitted.
It's not clear that it is possible. The obvious point of comparison is China, which has continually had to fight off new waves of infections despite strong lockdowns and strong border restrictions. (A lockdown started just 2 weeks ago covering about as many people as the total population of Australia.)
They do seem to be doing ok with it. Their lockdowns and done properly and actually work. ( speaking from the UK where arrivals still quarantine on the honour system and govt offices are hot spots despite being declared ‘COVID safe’)
The Virus Changed. Now We Must ‘Get to Zero’ or Face Catastrophe
141–150 of 248 posts
Re: The Virus Changed. Now We Must ‘Get to Zero’ or Face Catastrophe
#142Earlier quoted context omitted.
The New Zealand borders are open and accepting citizen and essential arrivals into quarantine with a long waiting list.
>> The New Zealand borders are open and accepting citizen and essential arrivals into quarantine with a long waiting list. This effectively reads "closed."
But yes, tourism or business trips are now infeasible. Fortunately it turns out that they were never essential.
Re: The Virus Changed. Now We Must ‘Get to Zero’ or Face Catastrophe
#143Earlier quoted context omitted.
I just don’t think many messages come out at all (considering bans on inbound travel and recent crackdowns on documentary uses of social media), and especially from outside of larger cities.
Any population of Chinese speakers in the west is going to know someone there on Wechat. I've talked to friends there as well, there's no major problem now. By contrast when things were bad in Wuhan people were reporting it. On top of that there's plenty of foreign reporters there, and plenty of foreign diplomats who would also notice.
Those policies sound even more strict than what we've been doing in Australia, and we had 2 weeks with 0 locally transmitted cases. With procedures like that it makes sense they have covid under control.
Re: The Virus Changed. Now We Must ‘Get to Zero’ or Face Catastrophe
#144Earlier quoted context omitted.
December 26th, in order to not get in the way of Christmas celebrations. Since our numbers dropped by half, they're looking to reopen on the 8th.
Looking at the case numbers, that looks pretty similar to the numbers here in Victoria. You're down from a peak of 3000/day on Jan 9, (as predicted, a couple weeks after your brought your lockdowns into effect) down to 1600/day. Looks like the policy is working and you'll hit 0 if you keep it up for a few more months. Why are you stopping?
Re: The Virus Changed. Now We Must ‘Get to Zero’ or Face Catastrophe
#145Earlier quoted context omitted.
New Zealand had it very easy with its geography. Same for other relatively small islands. Place like EU with its own national, often competing goals can't be effectively 100% locked out. That's what happens when you have a federation with strong independent parts. Not that I disagree with your points, they should be the baseline for any serious covid response. Lockdown measures have so far always been watered down by…
The geography in NZ is I think a secondary factor. Due to its isolation and reliance on agriculture, NZ has always had a very strong bio security policy and the systems in place to effect it. (Try bringing in a apple, pot of honey or muddy shoes. Actually don’t!). So when they had to make the call, they weren’t exactly starting from scratch. In addition, virtually everyone got behind the lockdown and made it work tog…
This ensured that the right people had the right terminology when a nationwide mobilization was required.
https://www.health.govt.nz/your-health/healthy-living/emerge...
Re: The Virus Changed. Now We Must ‘Get to Zero’ or Face Catastrophe
#146Earlier quoted context omitted.
Lockdowns work. End of story. Melbourne, Australia had a 4-month lockdown which turned an exponentially-rising 500+ cases a day scenario into elimination. Saving thousands of lives. No other place has managed to do something similar and it shows hotel quarantine of foreign arrivals, aggressive contact-tracing, mandatory mask-wearing, social distancing and lockdowns work. The Swedish laissez-faire approach does not.
Why single out Sweden? UK, who have/had more stringent lockdown rules than Sweden, are facing 1,540 deaths per million. Sweden is at 1,120 and roughly equal to France, Switzerland. Source: https://www.statista.com/statistics/1104709/coronavirus-deat...
Re: The Virus Changed. Now We Must ‘Get to Zero’ or Face Catastrophe
#147Earlier quoted context omitted.
>> I can't wait for other countries to simply copy the New Zealand quarantine rules When the United States of America can relocate to an island and near-permanently ban travel into the country like NZ has, we'll do that, I guess. EDIT: Ah yes, HN the libertarian paradise unless it's about COVID, then the recommendations are non-practical authoritarian measures and citing island nation success and hurling downvotes. K…
- Make tests free (fully subsidized) - Shut down the highway off-ramps into towns with some sort of inter-state quarantine scheme (make this legal) - Institute financial support for all non-essential businesses, then force them to close (cease in person trading) during lock-down - Educate the populace on Covid details It's not just about strong walls or deep oceans. We're not talking about a zombie apocalypse here. S…
Florida has free tests. I tried two places (giant parks filled with hundreds of cars waiting), the cops told me 3+ hours wait each, I went to a private clinic and was done in 20 min. But yeah, they have free and fully subsidized tests.
Apparently the logistics of it is not that simple.
Re: The Virus Changed. Now We Must ‘Get to Zero’ or Face Catastrophe
#148As a citizen of New Zealand I believe a short, sharp lock-down combined with test & contact trace is the only route to zero. I think that this option is far far better than being in "half measures" restrictions for very long periods of time. When a country announces their lock-down measures I feel excited for their populace that they might finally be heading to zero. Then I read the holes in the measures: - Resturant…
In Europe, the conclusion was that you simply cannot do that, physically. It is so integrated, even for essentials such as food or medication, that you have a huge area, requiring delivery/lorry drivers whizzing around, medical staff in hospitals and care homes, etc. Short sharp shock just can’t happen. So then, if you’re stuck in shades of gray, you have to weigh the antiviral benefits of the lockdown with just keep…
On return home, they need to assume they became infected en-route and use PPE suitable for that reality.
Medical staff already know how to avoid taking disease home. They just need the funding and support to access the right PPE, facilites and reasonable hours. If they are in transit, the need a good reason and well thought out measures.
Quarantines don't need to stop all people, just those who are likely to spread the disease.
Re: The Virus Changed. Now We Must ‘Get to Zero’ or Face Catastrophe
#149Earlier quoted context omitted.
Australia is big and sparely populated compared to other countries that implemented full lockdowns. Also, it's summer down there, with heat waves, etc. All of this diminishes virus' ability to spread. It's very situational. Australia is not doing anything more special than other countries. You gotta look into the meaning of these numbers and just the value. Lockdowns do work, technically speaking, but not in the long…
1. 71% of Australians live in a handful of cities each of which has very high density relative to the rest of the world. 2. Lockdowns occurred during winter. 3. Australia has effectively eliminated COVID-19 and by having so few cases it allows for targeted lockdowns to work over the long-term e.g. Perth just had 1 case today and is having a short 5-day lockdown - their first in 10 months.
Sidney - 423/km2 Melbourne - 508/km2 Brisbane - 155/km2
Paris - 20,000/km2 Berlin - 4,206/km2 London - 5,666/km2 NYC - 27,755/km2
You are effectively out of touch with reality.
edit:
NYC - 27,755/km2 to NYC - 10,716/km2 (27,755 is in mi2 units)
sources: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brisbane https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sydney https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Melbourne https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_York_City https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paris https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Berlin
Re: The Virus Changed. Now We Must ‘Get to Zero’ or Face Catastrophe
#150Earlier quoted context omitted.
- Make tests free (fully subsidized) - Shut down the highway off-ramps into towns with some sort of inter-state quarantine scheme (make this legal) - Institute financial support for all non-essential businesses, then force them to close (cease in person trading) during lock-down - Educate the populace on Covid details It's not just about strong walls or deep oceans. We're not talking about a zombie apocalypse here. S…
> - Make tests free (fully subsidized) Florida has free tests. I tried two places (giant parks filled with hundreds of cars waiting), the cops told me 3+ hours wait each, I went to a private clinic and was done in 20 min. But yeah, they have free and fully subsidized tests. Apparently the logistics of it is not that simple.
Kind of no point having the population get tested now in the US. Without contact tracing and quarantine a positive result arrives too late to help anyone.
First you need to lock down the entire state until the daily infected is only 1% of the testing capacity. 4 weeks of level 4 lock-down would do that. Then with contact-tracing you can start to get ahead of the virus by quarantining infected people (close contacts of the positive test) before they even transmit Covid further.
Also, I'm sorry that you are experiencing life in a state as infected as Florida. It sounds terrifying. I hope you get well soon and stay safe.