Live data from Hacker News

Statement of SEC Regarding Recent Market Volatility

sec.gov

191–200 of 906 posts

Re: Statement of SEC Regarding Recent Market Volatility

#191

Earlier quoted context omitted.

And then there's another guy writing smug 8-point steps! Truly the pinnacle of hacker news culture.

And then there's another guy who will comment on the comment of guy writing smug 8-points step! internet karma wohoow!

Choo choo.

Re: Statement of SEC Regarding Recent Market Volatility

#192

A Moment in the Life of an HN Genius: 1. Reads a technical document outside their domain. 2. Feels dumb because they don't have a grasp on any of the concepts. 3. Too busy to use the very internet which some of them probably helped build to magically render learning materials to the screen in front of them at zero marginal cost. 4. Sees the word "manipulation" 5. Substitutes the laymen's definition of "manipulation"…

Can we not write posts like this? The air of superiority without actually offering any insight doesn't contribute to interesting discussion.

Re: Statement of SEC Regarding Recent Market Volatility

#193

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The FOMO is palpable. There's a hurried rush of small investors hoping to turn their meagre savings into a big win, backed by the anxiety that if they don't try then they'll forever regret missing their one and only chance at a comfortable life. This sort of event would be less likely if America's wealth disparity weren't so grotesquely skewed.

Many just want to screw the hedge funds, finally it's their blood in the water.

I don't get this. I can't imagine the professional investor class is still blindly following their shorts. They're all out by now, aren't they? If the "little guys" are making money I tend to think it's coming from other little guys.

Re: Statement of SEC Regarding Recent Market Volatility

#194

Earlier quoted context omitted.

If WSB was a hedge fund they just have to buy some of GME - not all or even too much. Other hedge funds could buy some too. Just have a "dinner conversation" about it. Just like you and a few hedge funds can get together and collectively short GameStop and other companies... as they are doing now. There's no rule that I know of that says only one entity can make a specific investment. -edit- Don't forget that hedge f…

> Just have a "dinner conversation" about it. This would be illegal I think.

It is not: https://www.reuters.com/article/us-hedgefunds-probe-exclusiv...

Re: Statement of SEC Regarding Recent Market Volatility

#195

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The FOMO is palpable. There's a hurried rush of small investors hoping to turn their meagre savings into a big win, backed by the anxiety that if they don't try then they'll forever regret missing their one and only chance at a comfortable life. This sort of event would be less likely if America's wealth disparity weren't so grotesquely skewed.

Many just want to screw the hedge funds, finally it's their blood in the water.

The "their" in your sentence can be read as ambiguous as to which parties its referring to, aptly.

With crud like rwsb posters asking if letting their deep in-the-money calls expire unassigned will screw the funds more-- it may well be the case that it isn't fund blood in the water that you see in this feeding frenzy, at least not anymore.

Re: Statement of SEC Regarding Recent Market Volatility

#196
post #185

A Moment in the Life of an HN Genius: 1. Reads a technical document outside their domain. 2. Feels dumb because they don't have a grasp on any of the concepts. 3. Too busy to use the very internet which some of them probably helped build to magically render learning materials to the screen in front of them at zero marginal cost. 4. Sees the word "manipulation" 5. Substitutes the laymen's definition of "manipulation"…

Personally, I think smart people just do this. When I got sick with COVID I cannot begin to describe the number of people who became doctors during this unprecedented time , only to send me outdated comments, articles, and speculation. All of these people thought they were smarter than the instruction I received from a real doctor, nurse practitioner, and the CDC. These were smart people, though, and mostly (but not…

Sympathetic response is a thing.

One has to balance that with awareness they’re talking out their ass.

Re: Statement of SEC Regarding Recent Market Volatility

#197

A Moment in the Life of an HN Genius: 1. Reads a technical document outside their domain. 2. Feels dumb because they don't have a grasp on any of the concepts. 3. Too busy to use the very internet which some of them probably helped build to magically render learning materials to the screen in front of them at zero marginal cost. 4. Sees the word "manipulation" 5. Substitutes the laymen's definition of "manipulation"…

Yeah. Common sense no longer makes sense. Let me write a technical document stating how killing half of population is justified, but it is not for laymen to understand.

Re: Statement of SEC Regarding Recent Market Volatility

#198
post #75

There’s a long history of similar occurrences that follow along a common line: whatever appears to support individual investors will be the path taken by politicians and regulatory bodies. Right now it appears that the public wants to be able to trade on their terms because there is this narrative that the little guy is finally sticking it to the big bad hedge funds. In reality there is probably very little truth to…

The FOMO is palpable. There's a hurried rush of small investors hoping to turn their meagre savings into a big win, backed by the anxiety that if they don't try then they'll forever regret missing their one and only chance at a comfortable life. This sort of event would be less likely if America's wealth disparity weren't so grotesquely skewed.

When hindsight points out the opportunities that you overlooked which would have giving you that comfortable life it infects all future decision making.

Re: Statement of SEC Regarding Recent Market Volatility

#199

A Moment in the Life of an HN Genius: 1. Reads a technical document outside their domain. 2. Feels dumb because they don't have a grasp on any of the concepts. 3. Too busy to use the very internet which some of them probably helped build to magically render learning materials to the screen in front of them at zero marginal cost. 4. Sees the word "manipulation" 5. Substitutes the laymen's definition of "manipulation"…

Natural human behavior that smart people fall into just as easily as anyone else. Go read any HN thread on airplanes, education, or war...

Re: Statement of SEC Regarding Recent Market Volatility

#200
post #62

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Which is one take, certainly. But the problem is once you say that this is a market manipulation event you run into other issues. Is going on CNBC and talking about the strength of a company that you invested in market manipulation? Before this blew up you certainly had more reach. Is posting "research" or holding a conference call and telling people a company is garbage while you have the company shorted market mani…

You realise that all of this stuff has specific rules. There are specific rules about posting research, there are specific rules about media (newspapers and TV), there are specific rules about algorithms (I will answer your questions: no, no, no, no...the last question is...odd, if you know about sure-win algos then you must be very rich). And all of this stuff has happened before, it happened in 2000, lots of people…

I'm more of a "spirit of the thing" than "this is what the text says" kind of guy.

I'd argue that those things aren't fundamentally different than anything going on via WSB (assuming no bot accounts saying buy buy buy or something similar).

I think the difference is that for these other items there's nobody around to measure the impact.

Post reply on HN