Live data from Hacker News

Robinhood Play Store listing went from 329K reviews to 180K in few hours

play.google.com

251–260 of 613 posts

Re: Robinhood Play Store listing went from 329K reviews to 180K in few hours

#251

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It's a good idea to stop and think why megacorps all uniformly support modern social justice movements. Beneficial side effects include: * Racial diversity decreases worker cohesion and therefore unionization risk. * Dozens of reasons to get canceled means that anyone who has a social following can be torn down if they pose a threat.

I think it’s more likely emergent behavior born of individual executives making decisions that benefit their image and career, rather than some conspiracy. Having a diverse team looks good and deflects the political eye of Sauron from the largely white male upper management types, who are de-facto racists/sexists/etc in the pop culture lens. Who knows, maybe some of them genuinely believe that preferential hiring of…

I agree it’s emergent behavior; that’s not inconsistent with my comment.

The unionization risk thing isn’t made up. Amazon’s warehouse unionization risk rubric includes racial diversity as an anti-union measure.

Re: Robinhood Play Store listing went from 329K reviews to 180K in few hours

#252
I have little to no interest in any stock market, but everything that's happening around r/wallstreetbets right now is nothing short of fascinating. Almost seems like a domino effect, revealing step by step how much control these companies have, at least beyond the tech sphere[1], and how interconnected they are.

I mean, not that I'm really surprised by this happening with Google[2], but still I didn't expect them to get involved; don't see what they have to gain by this other than sharing on the bad publicity. Wonder if Apple will step in too.

Hopefully these events will actually lead into more adoption of decentralized protocols and platforms (and more support for open hardware development, maybe), and I'm starting to wonder if this week will go into the history books.

[1]: I mean to say that I know that many in the tech sector were already aware of it. But everyone at large was just kind of okay with it, so this is revelatory from that perspective. Well, hopefully it is.

[2]: In fact, this was probably caused by the surge in activity triggering one of their (in)famously intransigent algorithms, which never seem to stop increasing in number.

Re: Robinhood Play Store listing went from 329K reviews to 180K in few hours

#253

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It's more complicated than that. Jeff Bezos has a lot of money and relatively little political power. You can't just be rich; you also have to be in the right social groups. If money truly equaled political power, we'd look more like Hong Kong pre-1997 (and arguably pre-2020).

> relatively little political power He bought a newspaper. I would say he has plenty of political power.

He also had cities across the country doing cartwheels to get HQ2. He got an entire neighborhood in Arlington VA renamed, got a heliport approved, and other perks.

Re: Robinhood Play Store listing went from 329K reviews to 180K in few hours

#254

100k 1-star reviews sounds like bot spam FWIW also the link provides no proof

Yesterday at 290 000+ reviews : https://web.archive.org/web/20210128171659/https://play.goog...

four hours ago at 180K : https://web.archive.org/web/20210129002353/https://play.goog...

And now at 178K reviews https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.robinhood....

With more than 100k review in a day, Google must detected them as fake reviews by default.

Re: Robinhood Play Store listing went from 329K reviews to 180K in few hours

#255

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I think it’s more likely emergent behavior born of individual executives making decisions that benefit their image and career, rather than some conspiracy. Having a diverse team looks good and deflects the political eye of Sauron from the largely white male upper management types, who are de-facto racists/sexists/etc in the pop culture lens. Who knows, maybe some of them genuinely believe that preferential hiring of…

As a (very!) low level manager, I’ve been espousing that diversity prevents groupthink for years. If we have too much groupthink, we risk driving off a cliff, high-fiving each other the whole way down.

> diversity prevents groupthink

Ideological diversity prevents group think. The modern "diversity and inclusion" movement actually strictly enforced a procrustean ideological homogeneity, ironically. It's probably the biggest modern example of group think.

Re: Robinhood Play Store listing went from 329K reviews to 180K in few hours

#256

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It's more complicated than that. Jeff Bezos has a lot of money and relatively little political power. You can't just be rich; you also have to be in the right social groups. If money truly equaled political power, we'd look more like Hong Kong pre-1997 (and arguably pre-2020).

> relatively little political power He bought a newspaper. I would say he has plenty of political power.

Being able to advertise to the proles isn’t actually that valuable without a level of coordination that’s beyond bezos.

Re: Robinhood Play Store listing went from 329K reviews to 180K in few hours

#257
post #221

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I like the guy but I disagree with his fatalism. If we managed as human beings to curtail what was considered normal for millennia, to wit slave trade, we can also make things way better. We need to start by making it illegal to be a billionaire.

> We need to start by making it illegal to be a billionaire. I’m listening. What does this law look like?

Taxes. I think most human beings can survive with 100 millions of dollars of wealth (it's more than one can spend in multiple lifetimes). Anything over that can just be taxed.

The problem of letting any private entities get that rich is they start to take control of everything.

One such example is The East India Company having at one point a bigger private army than the British Army[0].

As things go we will soon be at that point again.

[0]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Presidency_armies

Re: Robinhood Play Store listing went from 329K reviews to 180K in few hours

#258
post #16

Honest question: why does Google care here? They don't really have a stake in the GME situation, with no short or long positions (I'm assuming). They aren't that connected to Wall Street companies. Why protect Robinhood at all?

My theory is something simpler: Play Store has anti-review-bombing mechanism. It simply kicks in in this case.

Re: Robinhood Play Store listing went from 329K reviews to 180K in few hours

#259

"Its a big club and you ain't in it" - George Carlin Politicians + Government Lackeys, Media Hacks + Corrupt Wall Street + Think Tanks + 'not for profits' https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cKUaqFzZLxU

I like the guy but I disagree with his fatalism. If we managed as human beings to curtail what was considered normal for millennia, to wit slave trade, we can also make things way better. We need to start by making it illegal to be a billionaire.

[deleted]

Re: Robinhood Play Store listing went from 329K reviews to 180K in few hours

#260
post #229

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It's a good idea to stop and think why megacorps all uniformly support modern social justice movements. Beneficial side effects include: * Racial diversity decreases worker cohesion and therefore unionization risk. * Dozens of reasons to get canceled means that anyone who has a social following can be torn down if they pose a threat.

Not only that but this "diversity over meritocracy" doesn't apply to Asian Americans, especially in academia, medical, law professions, entertainment etc. It's like there is two classes of minorities: Asians vs Non-Asians and the diversity narrative and standards differ radically for both groups. In fact, studies have shown that this ideological drive that pushes "diversity over meritocracy" only antagonize racial re…

Correct; “diversity” is shorthand for “racial Leninism”. It’s primarily about paying people off with status subsidies. Asians don’t need status subsidies so they don’t benefit from this system
Post reply on HN