Live data from Hacker News

Robinhood apparently selling people's shares ”for their own good“

twitter.com

21–30 of 35 posts

Re: Robinhood apparently selling people's shares ”for their own good“

#21
post #9
post #4

just a reminder not to believe random images off the internet that can be easily doctored. its possible RH is doing this, but also doesn't make much economic sense if it is just a normal share holding. Hold out for proof. Let's not have HN spread every sensational tweet.

just a reminder not to believe random images off the internet that can be easily doctored. Especially when they're trying to sell you something with the follow up tweet. :)

> Use WeBull instead

I was going to say "that didn't age well", but their plug for WeBull came hours after WeBull already announced their own trade restrictions.

https://twitter.com/webullglobal/status/1354828729713881091

Re: Robinhood apparently selling people's shares ”for their own good“

#22
post #20

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Maybe for you it's a news story, but for many of us it's a revolution.

The GME shareholders that WSB turned into billionaires thank you for your revolutionary service

WSB people are GME shareholders as well, just like TSLA shareholders.

Re: Robinhood apparently selling people's shares ”for their own good“

#23
post #4

just a reminder not to believe random images off the internet that can be easily doctored. its possible RH is doing this, but also doesn't make much economic sense if it is just a normal share holding. Hold out for proof. Let's not have HN spread every sensational tweet.

I'm getting first-hand accounts from coworkers about this right now. Seems legit. Appreciate the looking out though, you're absolutely right - we shouldn't jump on every little development while its still rumor.

Re: Robinhood apparently selling people's shares ”for their own good“

#24

These are probably margin calls for people trading on margin which is 100% legal and the risk you take when trading on margin.

Guarantee it’s this. They changed the capital requirements for certain stocks and people were over leveraged.

Re: Robinhood apparently selling people's shares ”for their own good“

#25

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Thank you. This WSB GameStop phenomenon is one of the most poisonous news stories I've seen in the history of the web. It seems to induce irrationality and melodrama as though it were a psychedelic drug.

Maybe for you it's a news story, but for many of us it's a revolution.

The internet told me that, too. It's a little early to know if it's a good one. If it's a bunch of crooked whales putting a different bunch of crooked whales out of business, I'm not enthusiastic. Especially if the revolution also screws over a bunch of hapless commoners.

Re: Robinhood apparently selling people's shares ”for their own good“

#29
post #6

But the shares are the user's property. Isn't this theft, since the person got whatever robinhood thought it was worth without consent? (presuming the user wasn't buying on margin which probably includes an agreement that they will liquidate if you won't be able to cover reasonably).

> Isn't this theft, [...] presuming the user wasn't buying on margin

Yes. It's also murder for hire, presuming that they contracted with someone to have the user executed.

Honestly, I'm not sure why you would assume that this wasn't a case of buying on margin since the forced liquidation is STANDARD for buying on margin and the user (however reliable they may or may not be as a source) didn't even say that it wasn't bought on margin.

Re: Robinhood apparently selling people's shares ”for their own good“

#30

Robinhood is a private company and can manage their platform as they see fit.

Well that's just not true at all. Being a private company doesn't magically exempt one from things like laws and regulatory oversight and all the rest of that.
Post reply on HN