61–70 of 120 posts
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Personally, I feel like this is really generous pricing Compare it to, e.g. Slack ( https://app.slack.com/plans/T01JN93179R?geocode=en-gb ) or Zoom ( https://zoom.us/pricing ) Notwithstanding any accounting issues raised by worble, which I'm sure will be ironed out over time
This is like people saying fastmail pricing is reasonable because other providers gyp you too.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Personally, I feel like this is really generous pricing Compare it to, e.g. Slack ( https://app.slack.com/plans/T01JN93179R?geocode=en-gb ) or Zoom ( https://zoom.us/pricing ) Notwithstanding any accounting issues raised by worble, which I'm sure will be ironed out over time
This is like people saying fastmail pricing is reasonable because other providers gyp you too.
Looking for pricing, I get to this page: https://www.8x8.com/products/apis/video >We're charging on a Monthly Active User (MAU) >Pricing starts at $0.35/MAU and decreases based on volume. >An MAU is defined as a unique user who attended at least one meeting, with at least one other user, in the same month. To determine a unique user, we store an identifier on the device's local storage, and that will remain the same…
We switched from a custom WebRTC because error handling becomes too complex with browser permissions and connection.
It does work much better, however there are still a few times that video just doesn't work, with no way to debug why
Earlier quoted context omitted.
it isn't? i used it for years and been very happy.
The marginal cost of the service they provide is like 10% of what they charge, or even less.
Is it still owned by atlassian?
I tried to run a Jitsi server. It's a madness full of Docker impossible things to run and a very long and confusing configuration file. I wonder why can't these things be provided as binaries with a simple set of settings. Now they offer Jitsi as a service for free up to 25 users? That's great though. It should cover 99% of normal people use cases, so no one will use meet.jit.si anymore.
Sorry to hear that. Any chance you can provide some more details on what you tried and didn't work? I'd like to improve on this.
> I wonder why can't these things be provided as binaries with a simple set of settings.
That's kind of what they already are, but at certain degree of complexity it unfortunately leaks back to the user.
The one feature I've been missing is remote control during a screen sharing session. I understand it was removed for security reasons (https://github.com/jitsi/jitsi-meet-electron/issues/431). Are there any plans to implement the feature again in the future?
Thanks!