Earlier quoted context omitted.
Parler was explicitly unmoderated by choice and hate speech was its selling point. You’ll have a hard time finding a) a service provider willing to tolerate that and b) much public sympathy for the service promoting hate. Yet it called into question freedom of speech. Same thing today with WSB, but the focus is clearly not hate speech (even if Discord says so). I find today’s bans way more objectionable than Parler,…
And if you intentionally want to have content that is objectionable, putting it on AWS seems like an awful idea. That's how Sci-Hub and TPB have managed to stick around for decades, and they've shown censorship on the internet isn't really a thing. God knows how many powerful forces have tried to censor them, to no avail. While I agree that in some ways this is worse than the Parler case, it also is a free service th…
Judging by the going rate for "server boosts", Discord would have easily had $5,000 a month in revenue tied to that server [1].
[0] https://www.reddit.com/r/wallstreetbets/comments/l6j4r9/wher...
[1] https://support.discord.com/hc/en-us/articles/360028038352-S...