Live data from Hacker News

Ask HN: What is the worst product you still use?

news.ycombinator.com

1–10 of 16 posts

Re: Ask HN: What is the worst product you still use?

#3
post #2

https://www.dmv.com/ For a sight that is so necessary to most Americans, it's really lacking in basic information and excessive in unnecessary information

That does not belong to the DMV of any state. Have you visted the DMV site for your state? As an example, here is California [1] It seems Wyoming uses .us and no https. [2] Nevada uses .com but at least has https [3] Now I am curious how much deviation each state has. They were supposed to follow the pattern www.dmv.[state].gov. Something went off the rails it seems.

[1] - https://www.dmv.ca.gov/portal/ [california dmv]

[2] - http://www.dot.state.wy.us/home.html [wyoming dmv]

[3] - https://dmvnv.com/index.htm [nevada dmv]

Re: Ask HN: What is the worst product you still use?

#6
post #2

https://www.dmv.com/ For a sight that is so necessary to most Americans, it's really lacking in basic information and excessive in unnecessary information

For a sight that is so necessary to most Americans, it's really lacking in basic information and excessive in unnecessary information

PEBKAC. You've been scammed. That's not a DMV site. It's a web site that does very well playing Google's SEO game.

Re: Ask HN: What is the worst product you still use?

#7
Every single build tool I still use. They’re either trash or constrained by trash. The “easy to use” tools are typically the hardest to use because they make everything that happens either totally opaque or incredibly difficult to introspect. Basically none of them follow the principles that are otherwise idiomatic for their platform (example: I cannot name a single JS-target build tool which is type safe or even validates configs before execution; I certainly can’t think of one that’s generally stateless or promotes composition). They all tend to rely on wildly unknowable magic to work around platform inadequacies.

If it sounds like I have a better approach in mind, I sure do. My main stacks are TypeScript on Node & Browser. Tools for these builds could easily be type safe by being built with TS as an assumption, and easily debuggable by being piped in stages just like a normal Unix chain. This doesn’t have to be wildly inefficient, the type system knows enough to determine what can be processed concurrently, and intermediate build products could be virtual without hitting the FS.

A naive approach just to prove this out would disregard those efficiency considerations and just literally pipe a series of builds with existing tools, each one taking the previous product as input.

Re: Ask HN: What is the worst product you still use?

#8
post #2

https://www.dmv.com/ For a sight that is so necessary to most Americans, it's really lacking in basic information and excessive in unnecessary information

That does not belong to the DMV of any state. Have you visted the DMV site for your state? As an example, here is California [1] It seems Wyoming uses .us and no https. [2] Nevada uses .com but at least has https [3] Now I am curious how much deviation each state has. They were supposed to follow the pattern www.dmv.[state].gov. Something went off the rails it seems. [1] - https://www.dmv.ca.gov/portal/ [california d…

And for everyone's complaining (and I had felt it in other states) I have to say the Florida DMV isn't that bad. I've rarely waited even in person more then 20 minutes, I have been able to do most things online for quite a number of years and their site while not great isn't horrible. Don't get me wrong, it could be better, but just I've not had the nightmare DMV experience with Florida that people equate with big states.

And to your point on URL's I don't think there is any real pattern. https://www.flhsmv.gov/ is Florida's state level DMV and counties have their own separate sites for local tag/tax offices.

Post reply on HN