Live data from Hacker News

Chamath Palihapitiya on Wallstreetbets [audio]

overcast.fm

101–110 of 198 posts

Re: Chamath Palihapitiya on Wallstreetbets [audio]

#101
post #67

The Chamath Craze is ridiculous. The guy is a stock promoter through and through. It's really sad to see people fall into this guys trap. He has an incredibly story (coming from nothing) but lets look at his career: He "leaves" (aka fired) Facebook for being a D*ck head. Nobody is willing to work with him because he is rude and a jerk. His direct reports would cry regularly. Steven Levy talked about this in his book…

“No major wins”

>Comes from nothing

>is a billionaire

Re: Chamath Palihapitiya on Wallstreetbets [audio]

#102

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It’s really not a cesspool. Outside of the frenzy, they do a solid job (when things are quiet) of finding cheap stocks with a potential to move within a year. Even GME, before the phenomenon, the subreddit was mostly targeting 40 dollars around April earnings. The short squeeze was a real tactical play, but most people weren’t 100% on that as the main catalyst (as in, most people really thought the ps5/Xbox sales wou…

I’ve been following it for 7-8 years now. Lots great DDs that didn’t turn out as well. After sterilization (ignoring 99% of the nonsense comments), I just see more guess work than anything else. Before GME, there was RiteAid, we all know how that panned out.

Yeah, and there was also TSLA and AMD and MU and others that did great.

The point is that they actually write out real strategies/positions as "DD", and you can make your own decisions.

Re: Chamath Palihapitiya on Wallstreetbets [audio]

#103

Earlier quoted context omitted.

No doubt, there is some good stuff in there as well. A few DDs are very in-depth and surprisingly good. I don’t think the whole subreddit is like that.

Does DD stand for Deep Dive or what does it stand for?

"Due diligence". It used both as a tag for posts that try to give real analysis, as well as a meme to describe terrible or humorous logic for making trades (e.g. "DPZ DD: everyone at this party just agreed that Dominoes Pizza is the best pizza, go long DPZ", stupid stuff like that).

Re: Chamath Palihapitiya on Wallstreetbets [audio]

#104
post #16

He didn’t have any answer as to the fate of new bag holders he created with his tweet. That was irresponsible. His plan to make hedge funds disclose their positions daily as some kind of a solution to overleverage makes no sense whatsoever. And he’s delusional about research skills of WSB posters as compared to Wall Street analysts.

That says more about the fundamental problem with the system than it does any given individual. When I see stuff like this that tries to push blame on an individual for tweeting I have to immediately scoff because it totally gives cover to the system that gives people a very healthy amount of rope to hang themselves with in the first place.

This isn't a defense of the guy by the way since all of this schtick is to ride positive PR as a billionare looking to enter political office in a climate where people aren't exactly enthused about billionares.

Re: Chamath Palihapitiya on Wallstreetbets [audio]

#105
post #67

The Chamath Craze is ridiculous. The guy is a stock promoter through and through. It's really sad to see people fall into this guys trap. He has an incredibly story (coming from nothing) but lets look at his career: He "leaves" (aka fired) Facebook for being a D*ck head. Nobody is willing to work with him because he is rude and a jerk. His direct reports would cry regularly. Steven Levy talked about this in his book…

“No major wins” >Comes from nothing >is a billionaire

He became a billionaire from Facebook stock not from venture investing.

EDIT: That's according to him. I wouldn't be surprised if the guy overhypes his assets. Also his divorce likely cost him half (they got married before he joined FB).

Re: Chamath Palihapitiya on Wallstreetbets [audio]

#106
post #83

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Equity holders of defunct financial institutions were not bailed out in 2009. They suffered massive losses.

What about equity holders of hundreds of close-to-defunct financial institutions who were able to bounce back only due to government intervention?

One of the roles of the fed is to prevent financial markets from suffering liquidity induced meltdowns. It’s a basic service that benefits everyone, like roads or the post office.

Re: Chamath Palihapitiya on Wallstreetbets [audio]

#107
post #58
post #16

He didn’t have any answer as to the fate of new bag holders he created with his tweet. That was irresponsible. His plan to make hedge funds disclose their positions daily as some kind of a solution to overleverage makes no sense whatsoever. And he’s delusional about research skills of WSB posters as compared to Wall Street analysts.

>And he’s delusional about research skills of WSB posters as compared to Wall Street analysts. Certainly there's a crowd on WSB that are just sheep, but there is a minority of WSB posters that produce quality research and analysis. The idea that Wall Street insiders are elite, a different breed, is mostly a myth. There are smart people working Wall St to be sure, but there are lots of smart people working elsewhere.

Not only that but there's plenty of people that work on wall street that no doubt hang out there all the same

Re: Chamath Palihapitiya on Wallstreetbets [audio]

#108
I was one of the first if not the first people to post weekly options yolo on WSB that gained traction years ago, I get a bit more into it in other posts.

Most of these top firms have a specific pipelines from top ivy schools, they are very very selective for a specific person usually from an upper class upbringing.

I think Chamath has a point in that there's a lot more people capable of understanding the dynamics of options than are given credit for.

There still seems to exist this hubris in wall street that unless you went to those top schools you aren't capable of understanding derivatives and most of those institutions won't even interview you for a position if your CV isn't prestigious enough. Yet time and time again you see these funds blow up.

That being said its amusing how people just ran with the caricature of a fresh out of high school, blue collar upbringing, degenerate CBOE options pit trader who you would find smoking weed during trading hours and coked out pounding drinks at Ceres after hours with an autistic antisocial 4chan twist(heard stories from people who knew floor traders like this).

It seems like a lot of the professionals can't see past the tongue in cheek self deprecating humor to realize its an act that people play up.

Re: Chamath Palihapitiya on Wallstreetbets [audio]

#109
post #67

The Chamath Craze is ridiculous. The guy is a stock promoter through and through. It's really sad to see people fall into this guys trap. He has an incredibly story (coming from nothing) but lets look at his career: He "leaves" (aka fired) Facebook for being a D*ck head. Nobody is willing to work with him because he is rude and a jerk. His direct reports would cry regularly. Steven Levy talked about this in his book…

I agree. Just look at the guy's twitter lately. He was hyping up some "huge" potential SAAS company and stringing people along. You could tell because in the comments you could see people speculating about which SPAC that information was associated with. It caused about 5 SPACs he is associated with to rocket up and then when he finally releases the information it is a smart lock company (latch) and not associated with any of his SPACs...which later sold off.

I was on reddit watching this speculation frenzy unfold. These idiots follow this guy's words and then spin rumors off of them....then those rumors circulate in this echo chamber until everyone is saying the same thing.

Then you have stuff like GME and AMC. I'm not surprised at all what is happening because there are so many people that just see the next big trend and just pile in.

Re: Chamath Palihapitiya on Wallstreetbets [audio]

#110
post #83

Earlier quoted context omitted.

What about equity holders of hundreds of close-to-defunct financial institutions who were able to bounce back only due to government intervention?

One of the roles of the fed is to prevent financial markets from suffering liquidity induced meltdowns. It’s a basic service that benefits everyone, like roads or the post office.

So to summarize – large, fully private financial institutions are so entrenched in the economy that them going under would be catastrophic for everyone. They also occasionally take massive risks with their money to make larger profits, and when those backfire the government has to bail them out with public money.

And all this is totally not a gambling operation with a public safety net?

Post reply on HN