21–30 of 300 posts
Top tier is still ~$100/(user*month); that seems a little much… does anyone here pay to use the top tier? Edit: Wow! I really appreciate everyone’s perspectives here!
Does this mean repository mirroring (pulling) can be incorporated into Gitlab CE? * https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/23166#note_494...
ok, this might suck. We are on bronze right now and yes there where some things in silver that would have been nice to have it was never worth the costs per user to upgrade (especially because a lot of features already in bronze are not things we actually use or need), this might mean we either switch to free or abandon gitlab if there is an alternative.
Is it 10000 CI minutes per user?
Top tier is still ~$100/(user*month); that seems a little much… does anyone here pay to use the top tier? Edit: Wow! I really appreciate everyone’s perspectives here!
For that, the ultimate tier is now competing with a Jira suite, or something that PMs use made by Microsoft or a similar type of product.
The licensing for the project management tool can easily run $50+/month/user
Add in the "business/customer access to the issue tracking" and if you've got Jira or similar, that adds on a gain a bit more $$.
Next, adding the artifact scanning tools. Yes, you can get them 3rd party... but its another thing to set up.
In the end, picture the 50-100 employee shop where the sysadmin is weighing in on "get GitLab Premium vs GitLab ultimate" and the reduction of additional installs and licenses that need to be managed.
Yea, it it adds $80/user/month, but if it saves an hour or two per user per month in productivity gains - that can make a difference.
In the organization I currently work for, we were considering the options of (GitLab Ultimate) vs (GitLab Premium + Jira + other tools) and ultimately went with the premium and other for a number of reasons... but GitLab Ultimate made a strong showing.
It's also really difficult to work out the impact of this. The feature comparison never really seems to include important git features, just headline sales features.
ok, this might suck. We are on bronze right now and yes there where some things in silver that would have been nice to have it was never worth the costs per user to upgrade (especially because a lot of features already in bronze are not things we actually use or need), this might mean we either switch to free or abandon gitlab if there is an alternative.
What are the things in bronze you did need/want, vs free?
Top tier is still ~$100/(user*month); that seems a little much… does anyone here pay to use the top tier? Edit: Wow! I really appreciate everyone’s perspectives here!
The question for Premium to Ultimate is "are you using GitLab for project and requirements management?" For that, the ultimate tier is now competing with a Jira suite, or something that PMs use made by Microsoft or a similar type of product. The licensing for the project management tool can easily run $50+/month/user Add in the "business/customer access to the issue tracking" and if you've got Jira or similar, that a…
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Especially considering GitHub enterprise is $21/month/user
Well but it seems gitlab offers a lot more value?
If you want everything integrated together this is probably fine, but GitHub Enterprise + Jira Premium is $35 per user per month (and every other project management tool is cheaper and better than Jira, just about). I don't know what the value add is here, other than self-hosting. (Or at least, the $65 value add).