Live data from Hacker News

The Battle of GameStop

paranoidenough.com

101–110 of 583 posts

Re: The Battle of GameStop

#101

Earlier quoted context omitted.

You might got lucky or not, but your comment is very dangerous for the people who have no idea and haven't been in the field. FAANG compensation is not peasant to billions of people, so please don't do that.

I made the money myself, I didn’t get lucky. Edit: The money was made over a 100 trades

people don't know just how hard it is to compound gains -- congrats.

Personal note: I really don't know why you would bring attention to yourself over this

Re: The Battle of GameStop

#102
post #71

Earlier quoted context omitted.

You’re a lottery winner, congrats. People made money during the tulip mania also. You’ve given money to the Wall Street, not taken it away. The biggest winners are companies like Robin Hood and hedge funds who buy their order flow data and hedge funds that take advantage of the bubble to play this, while the losers will be small investors who were late to the game and believed the bullshit about how it’s anything mor…

No I made this money myself. In any time in basically the last decade, if you leveraged up on the SPY or QQQ, you are now retired. People are too risk averse, they will be stuck in a job forever

No you gambled and got lucky. Good for you that’s great, but please recognize it for what it is. You played the market and won, just like people play the lotto, and some of them win too.

Re: The Battle of GameStop

#103
I can make $200k selling covered calls every month with a few million in capital. Options prices are crazy right now. It makes you think about how silly money is.

Re: The Battle of GameStop

#104
Today I noticed that Bad Bath and Beyond rallied 40% in the morning with no major news. It closed only +1.5%. I was wondering what's going on. I think that's one warning sign not to invest in companies that often flactuate greatly with no major news. It often happens with small companies so it's good to stay away from such companies. But BB&B seem to have a market cap of a few billions so it's not expected.

Re: The Battle of GameStop

#105
post #98
post #14

Earlier quoted context omitted.

>It's a never-ending shit-show. At least some of us are getting rich in /r/wallstreetbets. This is sad because most of what you've said can be applied to lotteries as well, which historically has been criticized as being a "tax" on the poor. The end result is the same: people putting themselves in a worse place financially (on average), just so they can cope with their bleak existence.

But we all know what the lottery is, sadly playing the stock market is glamorized beyond belief rather then shown for what it is:gambling

"diversified" "buy and hold" investing in the stock market is not gambling.

Re: The Battle of GameStop

#106

Earlier quoted context omitted.

People exist who in the past two days paid $150 for a share that most analysts think is worth about $14 — at a company with negative earnings for six of the last seven quarters, and minimal earnings growth over the past few years. I'm sure there was some bull case for the company, and it might have had a snowball's chance in hell around $14 or even $20/share. But at $60+ ? What on God's good earth is supposed to make…

> most analysts Counterpoint: "Most analysts" are hum-drum Wall Street hacks who cover dozens of companies and don't really have a clue about how the lion's share of them are run. I remember a few years back there was one analyst who kept talking about how NAND keeps getting cheaper and that's hurting memory suppliers...but the analyst's metrics didn't normalize for advancements in NAND speed nor the maturing of capi…

Comparing revenue might make sense if they were in the same slice of retail, but they aren't, so I think you can take zero value from such a comparison.

Re: The Battle of GameStop

#107
post #92

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I think this is more like beanie babies all over again. Except now that its easier to trade its happening in stocks. Populism of a companies stock doesnt really change the performance of that company. GME will implode eventually and the newest suckers or WSB will be left holding the bag.

You're not quite getting what I'm saying. A bubble like beanie babies and dutch tulips is still a logical consequence of seeking financial gain. A bubble is a game of chicken. It is about knowing when to jump off. This is a new phenomena. It is no longer about just making the bull thesis or the bear thesis. It is now persuasive to make the "this will fuck over a hedge fund manager" thesis. We need to add an entirely…

It sounds like new regulation before we begin 'pricing it in'

But I love the thoughts and agree with the analysis

Re: The Battle of GameStop

#108

Earlier quoted context omitted.

No I made this money myself. In any time in basically the last decade, if you leveraged up on the SPY or QQQ, you are now retired. People are too risk averse, they will be stuck in a job forever

No you gambled and got lucky. Good for you that’s great, but please recognize it for what it is. You played the market and won, just like people play the lotto, and some of them win too.

False. You have no idea about the trades I made. People are brainwashed, you can make money in the market. I made over 100 trades

Re: The Battle of GameStop

#109

Earlier quoted context omitted.

A whole generation is not YOLOing. We’re just trying to keep a roof over our heads.

The argument is that we’re working to keep a roof over our heads now because we YOLOed through college. And while that doesn’t describe me, I had a lot of peers who partied through college, skipped classes, hardly worked, majored in women’s studies / art history / literature / etc and still managed to live in the dorms, buy daily lattes, have the latest iPhones, etc.

Sorry, I was using YOLO in the narrow WSB sense of betting on low-likelihood, outsized gains. If you have the chance to risk 5k to get out of 100k student debt, why not do it, if you’re disillusioned by the system.
Post reply on HN