Earlier quoted context omitted.
The advantage of mastodon is that banning is not monolithic: so, if I have instances A, B, C, D: B can decide (through whatever process it uses for such things) they don’t like A’s content and ban it without affecting users on C and D. But, the problem it really solves is moderation: if I start an instance with 10 friends, moderation of posts on the instance is almost a non-issue that can be handled by a couple admin…
> if I have instances A, B, C, D: B can decide (through whatever process it uses for such things) they don’t like A’s content and ban it without affecting users on C and D. Yes, but this isn't really analogous to the complaint being presented. In the Mastadon world this article would have been titled " A Disabled My Account After I Criticized Them". The author is still free to use B, C, D etc, just like with http web…
What A defederating from B is like a website blocking your IP. Facebook banning an account is more like your ISP turning off your internet access.