Live data from Hacker News

Bitcoin Core Lead Maintainer Steps Back, Encourages Decentralization

laanwj.github.io

21–30 of 229 posts

Re: Bitcoin Core Lead Maintainer Steps Back, Encourages Decentralization

#21

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Probably the same way most people rationalize consuming the flesh of slaughtered animals, despite the massive negative environmental impact that has, and the better alternatives that are available.

Flesh of slaughtered animals is super tasty and nutritious.

[deleted]

Re: Bitcoin Core Lead Maintainer Steps Back, Encourages Decentralization

#23

The public has no idea how important the developers in charge of the code they run are. Underhanded C contests (The Underhanded C Contest is a programming contest to turn out code that is malicious, but passes a rigorous inspection, and looks like an honest mistake even if discovered.) make you really want honest guys upstream, and lots of eyes on things that affect consensus.

Especially when there are people that run scams like hex coin. Oh wow look it's the creator of that scam right here

Re: Bitcoin Core Lead Maintainer Steps Back, Encourages Decentralization

#24

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Probably the same way most people rationalize consuming the flesh of slaughtered animals, despite the massive negative environmental impact that has, and the better alternatives that are available.

Flesh of slaughtered animals is super tasty and nutritious.

[deleted]

Re: Bitcoin Core Lead Maintainer Steps Back, Encourages Decentralization

#25
post #20

I was wondering if these developers have any ethical concerns about the environmental impact they are responsible for by developing a technology which I can categorize with a single world: ABSURDITY!

There is no such thing as unethical technology.

Re: Bitcoin Core Lead Maintainer Steps Back, Encourages Decentralization

#26
post #13

I wonder how these Bitcoin devs rationalize the environmental impact their ongoing work has. They've created something that started as a revolutionary innovation, but by now is an incredibly wasteful way of turning kWhs into money. Something that has outlived its fitness as a payment system, but still trundles on due to its own inertia. Like oil execs that refuse to acknowledge that the age of oil is coming to a clos…

Probably still less wasteful than the system it is replacing. Tanks / Fighter jets / drones take more resources.

What do you think is protecting the electricity fuels it depends on?

Re: Bitcoin Core Lead Maintainer Steps Back, Encourages Decentralization

#27

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Probably the same way most people rationalize consuming the flesh of slaughtered animals, despite the massive negative environmental impact that has, and the better alternatives that are available.

Flesh of slaughtered animals is super tasty and nutritious.

That seems like a somewhat random point to make. Sure, there are positive characteristics of meat - just like there are of bitcoin. That's part of why the comparison between the two works.

Re: Bitcoin Core Lead Maintainer Steps Back, Encourages Decentralization

#28

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Probably the same way most people rationalize consuming the flesh of slaughtered animals, despite the massive negative environmental impact that has, and the better alternatives that are available.

Flesh of slaughtered animals is super tasty and nutritious.

You provide a good example of this sort of rationalisation: the benefit to the individual is highlighted, the collective harm is ignored.

Re: Bitcoin Core Lead Maintainer Steps Back, Encourages Decentralization

#29
The "stepping back", as mentioned in the title, doesn't summarize what's happening here. laanwj decided to delegate some of his lead maintainer tasks to others with aim to further improve the decentralization and reducing the attack surface. He want to continue to work on Bitcoin an Bitcoin Core.

Most recently, this became relevant as the bitcoincore.org website he (co-)maintains received a legal letter from a (fraudulent; as in unproven and repeatedly lying) entity claiming copyright of the 2008 Bitcoin whitepaper. He complied[0] by taking the PDF down from bitcoincore.org and received a lot of slack for it by parts of the community. He then made clear that he'll happily continue to work on Bitcoin Core and Bitcoin in general, but will not be a "martyr"[1] for the project: "it's up to you as bitcoiners to protect it". As a reaction a lot of community members and companies proceeded to host the PDF on their site [2].

[0]: https://github.com/bitcoin-core/bitcoincore.org/pull/740

[1]: https://twitter.com/orionwl/status/1352181235766988800

[2]: https://twitter.com/hashtag/BitcoinPDF

Post reply on HN