Live data from Hacker News

AWS announces forks of Elasticsearch and Kibana

aws.amazon.com

1–10 of 969 posts

Re: AWS announces forks of Elasticsearch and Kibana

#2
>Instead, new versions of the software will be offered under the Elastic License (which limits how it can be used) or the Server Side Public License (which has requirements that make it unacceptable to many in the open source community).

I'm a bit out of the loop here, can someone please tell me why Elastic decided to enact this seemingly Anti-OSS license?

Re: AWS announces forks of Elasticsearch and Kibana

#3

>Instead, new versions of the software will be offered under the Elastic License (which limits how it can be used) or the Server Side Public License (which has requirements that make it unacceptable to many in the open source community). I'm a bit out of the loop here, can someone please tell me why Elastic decided to enact this seemingly Anti-OSS license?

The announcement: https://www.elastic.co/blog/licensing-change

The "Why" behind the change: https://www.elastic.co/blog/why-license-change-AWS

tl;dr Elastic alleges that Amazon is infringing on their trademark and is offering Elastic's products as a service on AWS without being a good partner.

From Elastic's summary of the license change: "The SSPL allows free and unrestricted use and modification, with the simple requirement that if you provide the product as a service to others, you must also publicly release any modifications as well as the source code of your management layers under SSPL."

Re: AWS announces forks of Elasticsearch and Kibana

#4

>Instead, new versions of the software will be offered under the Elastic License (which limits how it can be used) or the Server Side Public License (which has requirements that make it unacceptable to many in the open source community). I'm a bit out of the loop here, can someone please tell me why Elastic decided to enact this seemingly Anti-OSS license?

Because they want to make money?

Re: AWS announces forks of Elasticsearch and Kibana

#8

>Instead, new versions of the software will be offered under the Elastic License (which limits how it can be used) or the Server Side Public License (which has requirements that make it unacceptable to many in the open source community). I'm a bit out of the loop here, can someone please tell me why Elastic decided to enact this seemingly Anti-OSS license?

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=25833781
Post reply on HN