Earlier quoted context omitted.
It isn't transphobia to object to female erasure. Not every women's issue is also a trans women's issue, and it's sexist to insist otherwise.
Please stop taking HN threads further into flamewar. It's not what this site is for and we ban accounts that do it, regardless of what they're arguing. If you wouldn't mind reviewing https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html and sticking to the intended spirit when posting here, we'd be grateful.
Cabal: A peer-to-peer, off-grid, community-first, hackable chat platform
331–337 of 337 posts
Re: Cabal: A peer-to-peer, off-grid, community-first, hackable chat platform
#332Earlier quoted context omitted.
It isn't transphobia to object to female erasure. Not every women's issue is also a trans women's issue, and it's sexist to insist otherwise.
Please stop taking HN threads further into flamewar. It's not what this site is for and we ban accounts that do it, regardless of what they're arguing. If you wouldn't mind reviewing https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html and sticking to the intended spirit when posting here, we'd be grateful.
Re: Cabal: A peer-to-peer, off-grid, community-first, hackable chat platform
#333Earlier quoted context omitted.
It isn't transphobia to object to female erasure. Not every women's issue is also a trans women's issue, and it's sexist to insist otherwise.
Please stop taking HN threads further into flamewar. It's not what this site is for and we ban accounts that do it, regardless of what they're arguing. If you wouldn't mind reviewing https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html and sticking to the intended spirit when posting here, we'd be grateful.
Re: Cabal: A peer-to-peer, off-grid, community-first, hackable chat platform
#334Earlier quoted context omitted.
It isn't transphobia to object to female erasure. Not every women's issue is also a trans women's issue, and it's sexist to insist otherwise.
Please stop taking HN threads further into flamewar. It's not what this site is for and we ban accounts that do it, regardless of what they're arguing. If you wouldn't mind reviewing https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html and sticking to the intended spirit when posting here, we'd be grateful.
Re: Cabal: A peer-to-peer, off-grid, community-first, hackable chat platform
#335Earlier quoted context omitted.
Oh yeah, I understand that bit - but how does it connect to the DHT in the first place. I couldnt see any information on where it connects when you arent yet peered (i.e. how does it bootstrap).
There are a collection of hyperswarm bootstrap node IPs that can get the discovery process started for new peers.
Re: Cabal: A peer-to-peer, off-grid, community-first, hackable chat platform
#336Earlier quoted context omitted.
It isn't transphobia to object to female erasure. Not every women's issue is also a trans women's issue, and it's sexist to insist otherwise.
Please stop taking HN threads further into flamewar. It's not what this site is for and we ban accounts that do it, regardless of what they're arguing. If you wouldn't mind reviewing https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html and sticking to the intended spirit when posting here, we'd be grateful.
Re: Cabal: A peer-to-peer, off-grid, community-first, hackable chat platform
#337Earlier quoted context omitted.
> The Christian ideal is to be tolerant of someone who is actively doing us harm. That seems like a foolish ideal that has the end result of you being marginalized, with people who would do harm to you and others gaining control of society. Frankly, it sounds like just another system of control invented by religious leaders. People who actively do us harm should be swiftly and firmly disabused of the notion that what…
Tolerance doesn't mean you never resist. Tolerance means you're willing to have a conversation, and you can be friends in spite of fundamental differences. Christians who live up to the ideal are willing to have a civil relationship with anyone . That's the point. That's tolerance. It means you actually know the other person, and you're not making (possibly misinformed) assumptions about them. The next step in the re…
Getting to know them and convincing them not to do it implies that you will not tolerate their actions, but have wisely decided that a soft touch is likely to get you better results.