Live data from Hacker News

Radio users reminded not to use radios in crimes

arrl.org

291–300 of 312 posts

Re: Radio users reminded not to use radios in crimes

#291

Earlier quoted context omitted.

>Yet we can recognize over-representation in violent crimes by any race is probably due to lack of resources It's just racism, being rich doesn't insulate you: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Henry_Louis_Gates_arrest_contr... Every major police force has a systemic racism problem and everything else is just window dressing. It's like the Civil War. In middle school you learn it's about slavery. In high school you learn…

> Gates found the front door to his home jammed shut and, with the help of his driver, tried to force it open. A local witness reported their activity to the police as a potential burglary in progress. Yeah, usually when you see people forcing a door open, you should let the police know. > It's just racism It's just the results of spiritual decline. Obviously anyone who has deeply found religion would know that spiri…

>Slavery was absolutely one of reasons several southern states entered the war, but it was by far not the only. Most southerners would not have fought purely for slavery because most of the soldiers were too poor to have owned slaves.

It was still about slavery: https://www.battlefields.org/learn/articles/why-non-slavehol...

>What concerned Southerners most about Lincoln’s election was his opposition to the expansion of slavery into the territories; Southern politicians were clear about that. If new states could not be slave states, went the argument, then it was only a matter of time before the South’s clout in Congress would fade, abolitionists would be ascendant, and the South’s “peculiar institution” – the right to own human beings as property – would be in peril.

As I said before, while there are other factors and while they are interesting and worthy of study, sometimes the core reason really is that simple. It's not "enlightened" to pretend that simple things are complex.

>Culture wars are useful for pushing narratives and keeping both sides locked in a relative stalemate. Coke and Pepsi both benefit from these antics (Are you a coke drinker or a pepsi drinker?), but it's not an appropriate framework for political decision making where you often need to find compromise and pressure points to move the conversation forward.

It's worked great for the Republicans for the last 40 years (Ronald was the original Donald) and there is no sign it will stop working any time soon. It's only ever the left who have to compromise. Name a time in the last 40 years where a Republican has compromised and been rewarded for it.

Re: Radio users reminded not to use radios in crimes

#292

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> Every single person here uses high powered encrypted communication without a license, it's a cell phone. Your cell service provider holds the license. Ham radio exam is not hard, and does not require special training, just some basic knowledge of how radios work and what the regulations are. I don't see what the issue is.

At the end of the day, my problems with ham is 1: For stupid legacy reasons, I can't use crypto 2: In order to get and hold a license, I have to provide my full name and address, which is then PUBLICLY AVAILABLE

It sounds like what you'd approve of is something entirely different than Amateur Radio. Neither of the things you mention is an accident or "legacy" restriction.

Re: Radio users reminded not to use radios in crimes

#293

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It's actually quite hard to get the FCC to fine you, you have to do something very clearly illegal for a very long period of time, and ignore the warnings given... Such as the WISP in UT some years back which continued to operate PtMP last mile 5 GHz stuff in the DFS radar bands, and got fined $25,000. If you go through the notices of apparent liability issued by the FCC, which are all public, the individual persons…

Back after Trump cut the FCC budget, I heard the number of active staff patrolling the airwaves went down to < 11. Think of that... 11 people for all of the United States. I know they have listening stations in various areas, but still 11 people can't effectively police the whole United States.

[deleted]

Re: Radio users reminded not to use radios in crimes

#294

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Your statement might be true if intelligence was say, uniformly distributed. But intelligence (like a lot of natural phenomena) is closer to a normal distribution.

You can split normally-distributed populations into 2 halves - "average" may also refer to median . Also, by definition, half the population has an IQ[1] less than 100 (which is the mean). Gp is correct - most people are not as "smart as you are" if you are above average (IQ).

> You can split normally-distributed populations into 2 halves - "average" may also refer to median.

In a normal distribution, "average" must always also refer to median; they are always the same value.

Re: Radio users reminded not to use radios in crimes

#295

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Yes?

Your statement might be true if intelligence was say, uniformly distributed. But intelligence (like a lot of natural phenomena) is closer to a normal distribution.

> Your statement might be true if intelligence was say, uniformly distributed.

> But intelligence (like a lot of natural phenomena) is closer to a normal distribution.

This is a baffling comment - uniform distributions and normal distributions do not differ in any way that is relevant to this topic. What were you trying to say? Why did you leave this comment?

Re: Radio users reminded not to use radios in crimes

#296
post #271

Earlier quoted context omitted.

not sure what you're referring to, amateur operators have to identify themselves

More accurately they're legally obligated to when transmitting.

i realized after posting they are probably talking about frs or mums

Re: Radio users reminded not to use radios in crimes

#297
post #285

Earlier quoted context omitted.

No they didn't.

Yes they have. https://deadline.com/2020/12/armed-protesters-enter-oregon-s...

There is some disconnect here. These are violent right-wing rioters storming a state capitol building. The allegation of OP was that BLM protestors were doing something like that.

Re: Radio users reminded not to use radios in crimes

#298
post #286
post #248

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I agree with you on how protestors should be treated, but take issue calling the people at the Capitol "protestors". Some certainly were simply protestors, but quite a few -- those we are talking about now -- crossed the line from protesting into breaking and entering, vandalism, and in some cases violent behavior.

BLM vandals stormed Oregon State Capitol. They also established autonomous zone where they had their private security shooting two black teenagers.

Are you sure about this? The link you yourself shared shows photos of people carrying "thin blue line" flags. The quotations inside the article you shared says "Just before their violent physical assaults on journalists, the right wing extremists literally tried to kick in the door of the Oregon State Capitol in Salem".

Here is the link you shared in a sibling comment: https://deadline.com/2020/12/armed-protesters-enter-oregon-s...

Re: Radio users reminded not to use radios in crimes

#299

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Same in Denver, doesn't seem to stop the homeless from overdosing in the bathroom.

Makes you wonder who the sign is for. I doubt that anyone considering committing crimes is going to read the sign and think "oh, I guess I better not."

It's for the public, who wants to think the library is doing something about people overdosing in the bathroom.

Re: Radio users reminded not to use radios in crimes

#300

Baofeng's, Baofengs everywhere. Of all the images I have seen of the attempted coup, I have only seen baofeng radios. These are very cheap ($20'ish) radios that work very poorly (they splatter all over the bands) even when equipped with decent antennas. They barely work when equipped with the stock rubber-duck antennas. It's easy to be a snob about the type of radios that they are using, but that's not even the point…

I think many felt they had nothing to hide. Many are in camera calling it a revolution. Many aren't hiding theur faces, giving their names in interviews.

A person in one of the videos taking photos of random documents says "Ted Cruz would want us to do this".

I think they expected to have no consequences...

Post reply on HN