Earlier quoted context omitted.
and in return, brave replaces your urls with their affilate links. no thanks i'll took the hassle to open tor browser on an ipfs client
Are we talking about BAT? Thought that was an opt in feature.
IPFS Support in Brave
291–300 of 464 posts
Re: IPFS Support in Brave
#292ipfs://bafybeigwwctpv37xdcwacqxvekr6e4kaemqsrv34em6glkbiceo3fcy4si/
Re: IPFS Support in Brave
#293Mozilla promised us Tor integration, IPFS integration and more private browsing by default. Brave delivered it all.
Mozilla seems to be moving in the other direction now. "We need more than deplatforming" https://blog.mozilla.org/blog/2021/01/08/we-need-more-than-d...
“We work to ensure the internet remains a public resource that is open and accessible to all.”
I guess by “all” they mean only people with political opinions they support.
Re: IPFS Support in Brave
#294Re: IPFS Support in Brave
#295Earlier quoted context omitted.
If you’re on iOS you already have native universal hand-off in Safari, works in both directions. Even if it’s off, you can see all your other device’s tabs at the bottom of the mobile safari tab switcher.
Maybe they use Windows or Linux.
They have both recently put existing tabs in the omnibox suggestions, which is a huge quality of life improvement.
Re: IPFS Support in Brave
#296Earlier quoted context omitted.
This is a killer feature for me too. Works great between all my devices across Linux, Android, and iOS. If I see an interesting article I just ship it off to my desktop to read later instead of keeping the tab open for days on my phone.
I've unfortunately had the opposite experience with FF send, I still use it all the time (or try to) when I find links on mobile that I want to read on a big screen, or when I have an image url on my laptop that I want to send from my phone via SMS, snapshat, etc. But the delay is just unbearably long and inconsistent. Sometimes (most often when sending desktop to phone) the delay is 15 minutes or more. I've found it…
Re: IPFS Support in Brave
#297Earlier quoted context omitted.
It is easier for Brave to deliver new features when the biggest work is done by Chrome team.
It was easy for Google to deliver Chrome when the biggest work was done by Safari team... It was easy for Apple to deliver Safari, when biggest work was done by Konqueror team...
Re: IPFS Support in Brave
#298Earlier quoted context omitted.
Mozilla seems to be moving in the other direction now. "We need more than deplatforming" https://blog.mozilla.org/blog/2021/01/08/we-need-more-than-d...
The funny part is that this is the bio in Mozilla’s twitter: “We work to ensure the internet remains a public resource that is open and accessible to all.” I guess by “all” they mean only people with political opinions they support.
Unfortunately part of making things "open and accessible to all" means revoking access to people who would weaponize the internet to contradict those goals.
A tolerant society means no tolerance for terrorists.
Re: IPFS Support in Brave
#299Re: IPFS Support in Brave
#300Mozilla promised us Tor integration, IPFS integration and more private browsing by default. Brave delivered it all.
Mozilla seems to be moving in the other direction now. "We need more than deplatforming" https://blog.mozilla.org/blog/2021/01/08/we-need-more-than-d...