Live data from Hacker News

Why do they still make car alarms? (2015)

popularmechanics.com

311–320 of 535 posts

Re: Why do they still make car alarms? (2015)

#311

Earlier quoted context omitted.

That is much easier to do when there is real competition and transparency. Unfortunately my only high speed ISP is Comcast and I had no idea that parts of my phone were made by slaves until just recently. Until business has less power, we cannot instill morals in a meaningful way.

I'm sitting here on my couch looking around my living room, and it occurs to me that a significant % of my belongings could have been made under labor conditions illegal within the US. It's a bit chilling to consider that.

this is tricky. Most of those workers don't have better options. Work in conditions that are illegal, or for much less pay elsewhere, and probably still illegal. Safety standards are not as high, but they get better as the companies learn from us. (Even at the least flattering look, cleaning up body parts and training a replacement takes time. Most people are better than that )

But I still avoid slave labor. The workers need to be free to leave for a better option if there is one.

Re: Why do they still make car alarms? (2015)

#312

Anyone with a car alarm enabled in a city is just straight up rude and inconsiderate. I can't imagine the mindset involved for someone to put a device outside someone's bedroom window that will somewhat randomly start blasting loud sounds at all hours of the night. I'd support legislation making it illegal. Why are car alarms exempt from noise ordinances?

[deleted]

Re: Why do they still make car alarms? (2015)

#313

Earlier quoted context omitted.

A free market has no morals, it's up to the participants to instill some.

That is much easier to do when there is real competition and transparency. Unfortunately my only high speed ISP is Comcast and I had no idea that parts of my phone were made by slaves until just recently. Until business has less power, we cannot instill morals in a meaningful way.

I don't know the specifics but I feel like that is not the result of a free market. I believe the government gave Comcast money to build out networks they own? In a free market you'd accomplish that by starting public collectives that do that build out, and then have the property owned in public trust. User/owners are unlikely to overcharge themselves for services.

Re: Why do they still make car alarms? (2015)

#315
post #197

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> In the UK this is disabled in the ECU, as using your horn while stationary isn't allowed Huh my car app has a 'honk' button that works when stationary, for finding it in car parks. Is that against regulation?

Your car also goes above 70 ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

As I proved reciently on a trip through an area where the speed limit was 75.

Re: Why do they still make car alarms? (2015)

#316
post #133
post #110

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Some people think that the honk/beep is to confirm that the car got locked and the alarm got activated. So they will press the lock button until they hear the confirmation.

But it is a confirmation. If you're far enough away (perhaps you forgot to lock right away), you won't hear the lock mechanism and wont know if you are too far away for the signal to reach. So you wait for a honk.

Light flashes twice, the mirrors fold. Visible at any distance.

Re: Why do they still make car alarms? (2015)

#317

Earlier quoted context omitted.

They will not hesitate in San Francisco to break a $300 window to steal the change out of your ashtray.

Back when I drove a soft-top convertible I would just leave my doors unlocked. Better to lose whatever change is in the ashtray than re-cover the top.

A friend had his S2000 cut open and seats stolen 3 or 4 times in Florida, insurance company finally dropped him.

Re: Why do they still make car alarms? (2015)

#318

Earlier quoted context omitted.

That’s a good move. I have a Subaru with the EyeSight system for lane detection, adaptive cruise control, etc. It’s annoying that the cameras are RIGHT THERE and always on, and they even store a 22-second history that can be accessed by police or insurance in case of a crash, but I, as the vehicle owner with a vested interest in access to the feed, have no way of tapping into it and storing it for myself.

How do police or insurance access it?

Sorry, I’m not sure of the details.

My info came from the forum posts I found while explicitly looking for how to use the cameras as a dashcam a while ago. Some of them linked to the spots in the user manual that mention the 22-second loop, but the manual doesn’t have more info on how the access works. All I really know for sure is “we haven’t figure out how to get to it ourselves” and the rest is what I picked up from those threads.

Re: Why do they still make car alarms? (2015)

#319

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Yeah. One time it was an older lady with her daughter. They stayed with me 3 days until they managed to sort something out with social services. I think they're in San Diego now. They had a dog along who crapped in my living room, and they ended up cleaning my house top to bottom as an apology. Just because someone's homeless it doesn't mean they're on drugs or stuff like that!

What a sad story.

Not that both can't be true, but was surprised at your words. I read it as a subtly sweet story. Surprising in both generosity and gratitude, hinting at still being in touch, sincerity. (But yes, agree that poverty itself is sad.)

btw you're a beautiful person, spiritplumber (been without home in the past too)

Re: Why do they still make car alarms? (2015)

#320
post #84

Is nobody going to mention the hilarious typo in this article? "mechanics plug in to asses"

I was going to comment on it but did search first and found your comment. It is hilariously funny but more to the general theme of HN is a notable example of a typo that cannot be caught with a simple spellchecker and probably not even more complicated grammatical checker, but some kind of neural network maybe?
Post reply on HN