Live data from Hacker News

Parler’s de-platforming shows the exceptional power of cloud providers

cnbc.com

291–300 of 984 posts

Re: Parler’s de-platforming shows the exceptional power of cloud providers

#291

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> Everything Amazon did was within the terms of their contract. Everything except for 30 days notice. Oops.

And opportunity to cure.

Parler was in breech. They were notified and given nearly 2 months to remedy.

Re: Parler’s de-platforming shows the exceptional power of cloud providers

#292
post #257

That is the most depressing part for me - how easily American society is scared into giving up their freedom ideals. Turns out they don't have to be threatened with overwhelming force. They don't need to be threatened with death, starvation or torture. They don't need to be threatened by economic ruin or untold suffering. No, the richest and most safe civilization ever existed on the face of the planet is ready to gi…

They're (correctly) scared because they've seen how many of them would support the insurrection.

Re: Parler’s de-platforming shows the exceptional power of cloud providers

#293
post #11

I gotta say, recent events have left me shaken to my core. I thought I believed in free speech, to the point where I started a company dedicated to providing privacy and communications products that were not subject to control by any central authority (that turns out to be very hard!) But watching the events of the past few years unfold I am no longer convinced that this would really make the world a better place. I…

Maybe the simple solution you are looking for is that lies should not be considered free speech in the same way that false advertising and fraud is considered illegal in the land of the first amendment. Food for thought.

Re: Parler’s de-platforming shows the exceptional power of cloud providers

#294

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It's incitement. Donald Trump was just impeached for the same thing.

Absolutely ridiculous. Unless you are credibly telling people to actually go and commit violence, it is no such thing.

Trump did not "credibly tell[] people to actually go and commit violence".

He "set the stage" as it were, and people did what they did. It's really not that different from what the women did: She got people upset about Islam.

Re: Parler’s de-platforming shows the exceptional power of cloud providers

#295

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> I don't understand how any CEO of any large company would be comfortable with the risk of getting the rug pulled underneath all of its critical systems given that this is just what happened. If you are trying to make a case that Amazon arbitrarily pulls the plug on customers, Parler should not be your poster child. Amazon gave them 7 weeks of advance notice that their content was in violation of their agreement. Th…

> Amazon gave them 7 weeks of advance notice that their content was in violation of their agreement. Not the same thing as giving them notice of intent to terminate the contract. If Amazon said "some of your content is in violation, but let's work together to improve your moderation, you have nothing to worry about" that does not give Amazon the right to turn around and terminate them after only 24 hours notice.

Parler was in breech. Amazon could have stopped providing service at any point where Parler was knowingly hosting content that violated their contract.

The fact that they continued providing service was a curtesy, not an obligation. For most smaller/ non connected entities they'd have been dropped much much sooner, and likely without notice.

Re: Parler’s de-platforming shows the exceptional power of cloud providers

#296
post #11

I gotta say, recent events have left me shaken to my core. I thought I believed in free speech, to the point where I started a company dedicated to providing privacy and communications products that were not subject to control by any central authority (that turns out to be very hard!) But watching the events of the past few years unfold I am no longer convinced that this would really make the world a better place. I…

People are a product of their environment, and this environment with rampant vanity, media run for profit, and late-stage capitalism make people a distinctly unpretty thing, whatever material gains and safety a small part of the global population have gotten from it.

Re: Parler’s de-platforming shows the exceptional power of cloud providers

#297

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Always question everything you are told, especially by central authorities, mainstream popular media, etc. Seek out information from variety of sources and discern the truth from fiction. What you may think is evidence may be completely opposite of what it actually is. Especially any narratives that are pushed to convince people to voluntarily give up privacy and freedoms. Just look at all the regular people going ar…

What makes central authorities and mainstream popular media inherently more suspicious? I disagree that having worked on tech projects would help you spot propaganda. It is illogical to assume you're an expert on the stock market just because you know how to code. (There's a fallacy name for this one which is escaping me)

> What makes central authorities and mainstream popular media inherently more suspicious?

I'll take a stab.

Central authorities tend to be and to become political in nature. Their incentives include, among other things, maintaining their funding and not looking bad (eg: maintaining a purpose for existing, excusing their own misbehavior, making any political benefactors happy). What they say will probably align with those institutional incentives first, before truth. It can also stop them from saying things they ought to.

Mainstream popular media does not exist to be an objective arbiter of truth but instead because enough people want to consume it. It's a business, albeit a business that has an incredible amount of power over not only the public's opinion, but what they should care about, both through what they report and what they don't report. They will push as many emotional buttons as they can to keep you coming back. Because they have a lot of power over the public they are targets for actors wishing to advance their own goals. Individual journalists are not a-political and you shouldn't expect them to be. Assume all reporting is tribal (especially if you agree with it), and that not only is the story as presented probably biased towards their own view of the world but that they've probably also left inconvenient things out. Political creatures tend to associate with those they agree with, and are in turn controlled by the group. Potential ostracism from their in-group is another source of bias.

Re: Parler’s de-platforming shows the exceptional power of cloud providers

#298

Earlier quoted context omitted.

There should be nothing illegal about “attacking” a religion with words, all the moreso if those words are factually accurate.

It's incitement. Donald Trump was just impeached for the same thing.

It's not incitement to call a child pedophile a child pedophile unless you approve of said child pedophile. It's really quite simple.

Re: Parler’s de-platforming shows the exceptional power of cloud providers

#299
post #133

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I thought it's obvious from the context, but examples include denying the holocaust being a crime.

I don't see why a future collapse into tyranny of a country in Europe would have to involve a revival of the symbols of any particular defeated regime. If they needed symbols for propaganda purposes, they'd draw from legal symbol pools, like Roman culture. (It "worked" once...) More likely, they would draw from contemporary symbols that already had positive sentiment associated with them. The point being, it's not cl…

> I don't see why a future collapse into tyranny of a country in Europe would have to involve a revival of the symbols of any particular defeated regime

It wouldn't have to. But having watched Hitler sell the idea that Germany was being unjustly punished for Jewish lies a generation earlier, they drew the conclusion that [West] Germany was quite likely to see would-be tyrants rallying around a Lost Cause narrative and that vulnerability to this was a bigger problem than a lack of diversity in holocaust historiography. Or more straightforwardly, they figured German democracy faced a more imminent threat from neo-Nazism than a slippery slope towards an Official State Version of History. A view which seems to have persisted even after reunification with the East which had considerable recent experience with the pervasive censorship involved in promoting its Official State Version of History.

Re: Parler’s de-platforming shows the exceptional power of cloud providers

#300
post #250

Earlier quoted context omitted.

And what of the lies which led us into the Gulf War and the Iraq War? Hundreds of thousands of people are dead because of those lies, and they were broadcast from coast to coast by every credible news media organisation in existence. The same organisations now being lauded as the bearers of ultimate truth. When the next set of lies is rolled out to land us in another unending conflict, I would quite like the internet…

> And what of the lies which led us into the Gulf War and the Iraq War? Hundreds of thousands of people are dead because of those lies, and they were broadcast from coast to coast by every credible news media organisation in existence. The same organisations now being lauded as the bearers of ultimate truth. What "lie" led us into the Gulf War? Are you claiming that Iraq did not in fact invade and conquer Kuwait? And…

> What "lie" led us into the Gulf War?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nayirah_testimony

Post reply on HN