Earlier quoted context omitted.
What I'm saying is that many home owners are paying significantly less than it would take to rent the same house, because they bought decades ago. Though of course there are also those who bought at high prices too. If you want to know about rents, it would make sense to just look at rents. I wonder how the housing component of CPI would look if there were a survey that was limited to renters?
My understanding is that the index relies on estimates of what homeowners would pay in rent for equivalent housing. If you think longtime homeowners are paying less, then substituting equivalent rent should push the CPI rate of inflation to be higher than the genuine rate. An overestimate. So you think correctly calculated inflation is less than the CPI says? I thought everybody who thinks it is inaccurate thinks it…
"If someone were to rent your home today, how much do you think it would rent for monthly, unfurnished and without utilities?” [1]
So, I was wrong about this. I'm wondering how people might be biased, though? They could over- or under-estimate what their property would go for.
[1] https://www.bls.gov/cpi/factsheets/owners-equivalent-rent-an...