Live data from Hacker News

Show HN: Compare prices that US hospitals charge patients, insurance companies

turquoise.health

181–190 of 389 posts

Re: Show HN: Compare prices that US hospitals charge patients, insurance companies

#181
post #168

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I think a lot of people are missing one key difference. Healthcare in EU is based on solidarity system where every citizen pays a percentage share of his monthly salary to the medical insurance. So if you earn more, then you will also pay more medical insurance - but you will get the same treatment as others (unless you have some fancy private insurance on top of the regular insurance). So basically any medical expen…

This is how progressive taxation works. For some reason, US people happily pay for police, firemen, infrastructure or the military as a necessity of a functioning society but have serious problems considering healthcare in the same group.

Police and fire are paid for by local or state taxes, with some federal outlays via matching grant programs. Cities and states are free to start their own local and state tax funded programs. The only thing getting in the way is the enormous cost!

Because the US does provide for tax funded healthcare for the old (Medicare) and the pregnant/poor/disabled (Medicaid). The [cost of these programs](https://www.kff.org/medicare/issue-brief/the-facts-on-medica...) is greater than US military spending.

Re: Show HN: Compare prices that US hospitals charge patients, insurance companies

#182
Looks interesting. How is this different than test claim submissions available from Eligible, Waystar, PokitDoc, etc?

And are you licensing out cpt codes from the ama? IMHO the AMA and their copyright of CPT codes is the biggest setback to progressive change, transparency, and adaptive change in tech... Payers and well funded companies can afford licensing, otherwise they will strangle you with lock down...

Re: Show HN: Compare prices that US hospitals charge patients, insurance companies

#184

Walked into a clinic for a weekly shot. Paid 60 dollar co-pay each week. One day I asked how much go get shot without insurance. It was $15. I was paying 4x to use insurance. And insurance was getting billed on top of that.

Did you switch to getting it without insurance?

Re: Show HN: Compare prices that US hospitals charge patients, insurance companies

#185
post #101
post #36

Earlier quoted context omitted.

For folks who don’t believe in universal medical coverage, this is part of the reason why it’s so inefficient for it not to exist. The uninsured person going to the hospital at 1AM that requires an MRI because slipped a disc in their back still ends up getting that MRI. When they fail to pay that bill, which would be 5%-10% of their annual earnings, we all still pay for it. We just decided to layer in debt collection…

Why add additional steps, government should open hospitals and provide healthcare directly.

Why? (Seriously - you seem to be assuming the answer here.)

Would the same statement be true for food and shelter (also necessary for life)? Should the government be the provider for all food and shelter in order to avoid additional steps?

Re: Show HN: Compare prices that US hospitals charge patients, insurance companies

#186

It's always fascinating to see that even compared to prices you pay as a self-paying patient in Germany (which are already 1.5x - 2x higher than what the "public" insurances, ie. 85% of the population, pay for the same procedures), the prices in the US are about 5x to 10x higher. The standard of care seems to be quite comparable if you look at outcomes, so there must be huge inefficiences in the American system (doct…

Chargemaster prices (the non-negotiated price) are ridiculously high in the US. They’re so high that some hospitals will give uninsured patients a break of “half off” without even negotiating.

The reason for this is that chargemaster price is a fake dollar price resulting from a broken incentive structure and process. Here’s a setup:

A hospital is working out a negotiated rate for aggregate services with an insurance company. The insurance company wants to pay less, and they’re willing to put the hospital “in network” and bring their block of customers with them by doing it. But the negotiators on both sides aren’t going to sit and figure out the “right” price of every procedure. That would take forever (and there’s dinner at a Michelin starred restaurant to go to after this deal is done), so they agree that they will just pay some percentage of the chargemaster price, say, 50%.

Over time, the hospital administrators say “we need more money for this” and realize they have a lever. 95% of their customers are paying negotiated rates that are a percentage of the chargemaster price. The percentage is locked in stone, but the chargemaster rate? Yeah. They can change that.

The insurance company cries foul at their Michelin two-star dinner the next month, and the hospital agrees to lower the percentage a little in the next contract. Now the insurer is feeling flush, and the hospital is making about what they were doing before from that 95%. The remaining 5% who were uninsured are hanging upside down and getting shaken for loose change.

The cycle continues, and, eventually, the negotiated percentage drops to something comical, like 12%, but the chargemaster rates have soared. In the end, a pair of Advil “costs” $68 and uninsured patients have nosebleeds from being hung upside down for so long.

But there’s a new restaurant to try out, and someone else’s personal bankruptcy is a small price to pay for no-fuss managed care...

(Note: Marketing and administration accounts for more than a third of health care costs in the US, which is to say that health care bloat and weight due to a multi-player adversarial privatized system accounts for more than 5% of our GDP, so the chargemaster isn’t the only reason for sky high healthcare costs in America.)

Re: Show HN: Compare prices that US hospitals charge patients, insurance companies

#187

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Out of curiosity, how much will this reduce the cost of health care? The idea, as it's been explained to me, is that visibility into the cost of medical care will result in downward price pressure. How much?

Transparent pricing enabling the comparison of pricing between different sellers is only one piece of a functioning marketplace. You also need multiple informed sellers and multiple informed buyers.

So it's a step towards a complete policy. What is the complete policy? Granted we might not see it enacted now, but it would at least clarify where the administration was headed.

Re: Show HN: Compare prices that US hospitals charge patients, insurance companies

#188
One important piece of context here is that these rates are negotiated as part of a contract bundle where an insurer is bringing a pool of patients to the facility. Prices can vary widely procedure to procedure because they are associated with over or under representation of certain factors within that pool. For example, grossly simplified, I might have a particular service line, hip replacements (an ortho program). The insurer whose patient population is going to 'keep the lights on' in that service line is going to see a very different rate per service than a different insurer who rarely has patients that need it. Nothing about these prices shown are really reflective of the costs of doing the procedure such as pricing in a retail store.

I do think this transparency initiative will result in more consistent costs but not necessarily net lower costs.

Comparisons to other countries that are smaller than the united states are somewhat apples to oranges. There are a lot of factors that are glossed over when someone says "costs are 5x higher in the US than my country" including real estate, energy subsidy, and so on. Its a deep well.

Re: Show HN: Compare prices that US hospitals charge patients, insurance companies

#189

I think something else that would be of interest would be doing this for drug prescriptions: compare the cost that my employer, the NHS, pay for a compound and those that Americans pay for the exact same compound. This is easy on my end at least -- prices and prescription guidance are released in the BNF / British National Formulary annually and are all made available in public. I have never understood the US system…

> I have never understood the US system of "co-pays" and found the whole thing very confusing.

I think you're mixing up a few things here. The co-pays are meant to make the patient directly pay some of the cost to decrease abuse of the system. There are many different structures for co-pays so saying anything general is kind of difficult, but there are reasonable arguments supporting such a system. In Sweden for example you do have to pay certain costs (which are capped) for essentially the same reason.

But that has nothing to do with the fact that prices vary so widely for the same products and services. Personally I think that the US system should at a minimum require that

1. All medical products' and services' costs to published publically;

2. All costs to be non-discriminatory (meaning everyone regardless of any insurance plan or none must pay the same);

3. All costs be available prior to any services provided.

In other words, there are no negotiated plans with different prices, there are no surprise bills, patients actually are able to understand costs, and real competition is actually theoretically possible. None of this would necessarily preclude an insurance plan from having co-pays, it would just make the only point of the insurance plan purely financial and open as it should be.

Of course the US could just move to a single-payer government-run system, but that's a different discussion. If the goal truly is to have a market-based system, then I think my points above should be implemented.

Re: Show HN: Compare prices that US hospitals charge patients, insurance companies

#190
I had this exact idea ~6 months ago but didn't know where to begin. I'm sincerely glad someone else built it. We're in such desperate need of justice when it comes to U.S. healthcare and this is a really good first step in holding the system just a little bit more accountable.
Post reply on HN