Live data from Hacker News

The Bit Short: Inside Crypto’s Doomsday Machine

crypto-anonymous-2021.medium.com

271–280 of 297 posts

Re: The Bit Short: Inside Crypto’s Doomsday Machine

#271
post #269

There seem to be quite a lot of misunderstandings in this post. Not sure how familiar author really is with inner workings of crypto markets. First thing first, is Tether sketchy? Yeah, pretty sketchy. But not for the reasons provided in the article. USDT is the most traded asset against other crypto because it is the easiest vehicle to use for all sorts of arbitrage. USDT is available to trade with on every non-US e…

Are USDC transactions less private or decentralized than USDT?

It looks like it's possible to freeze an account [1], but I'm wondering how that's done.

[1] https://news.bitcoin.com/centre-obliges-government-request-f...

Re: The Bit Short: Inside Crypto’s Doomsday Machine

#272

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Thanks for the extra context - I should have been more clear. CPI does capture OER and rental costs as you show. I get that mortgage costs and the like aren't considered as consumption ( rightly so ) but that makes the measure inaccurate when assessing prices people pay to live day to day. Rental prices are generally a more applicable indicator for most of the population as the BLS says but the rising costs of houses…

I think what you're missing is that many people are not paying market price for housing, because they bought their houses a long time ago. If they have mortgages, they were set by the home price when they bought. CPI is an average. The people who have owned their own homes for years are dragging down the average for the cost of living. You can't get the cost of living that they have if you buy today. Averages can mis…

[deleted]

Re: The Bit Short: Inside Crypto’s Doomsday Machine

#273

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Thanks for the extra context - I should have been more clear. CPI does capture OER and rental costs as you show. I get that mortgage costs and the like aren't considered as consumption ( rightly so ) but that makes the measure inaccurate when assessing prices people pay to live day to day. Rental prices are generally a more applicable indicator for most of the population as the BLS says but the rising costs of houses…

I think what you're missing is that many people are not paying market price for housing, because they bought their houses a long time ago. If they have mortgages, they were set by the home price when they bought. CPI is an average. The people who have owned their own homes for years are dragging down the average for the cost of living. You can't get the cost of living that they have if you buy today. Averages can mis…

If homebuyers are irrationally paying significantly more than it would cost to rent the same house, then that doesn't seem to me like a valid reason to inflate the indexes.

If homebuyers push prices of housing up and that does increase rents, then it is a valid reason to adjust CPI upward, and they do, AFAIK.

Re: The Bit Short: Inside Crypto’s Doomsday Machine

#275
post #37

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The argument basically is tether has been inflating the price of bitcoins. If tether collapses bitcoins will still be there but may trade at $3000/coin rather than $38000. Comparing with gold it's like the price has been inflated by people buying it with forged dollar bills. That said the author seems a bit new to this all with his shock at finding Bob is likely being scammed. Bitcoin has been linked with scams almos…

Why on Earth would $100 billion worth of Tether rushing for a conversion into anything else drag _down_ the price of BTC? Or any other coin for that matter? Have you actually sat down and thought about this, even if 99% waited and cashed out over weeks, that 1% is still a huge injection into the ecosystem. People have been shown time and time again that the money is there, the peg can hold, the underlying company is…

Even a short requires a counter party to fulfill!

If market craters and the counter party to your short disappears, where are you going? The SEC? Finra?

Honestly, you really have no idea.....

Re: The Bit Short: Inside Crypto’s Doomsday Machine

#276

Today, January 15th is the court-ordered disclosure date for Tether. So soon we should know how big the Tether bubble is. Clearly, it's time to get out of USDT. There's no upside potential, and there's a big downside potential.

I thought the same, then realised Courts move very slowly. May be months before we have any reaction or statement.

What IS fascinating and will be very telling is to closely watch Tether issue from ‘Treasury’. Seems they have stopped as they KNOW what is in the millions of pages they delivered to AG and from now on need to be much more careful. If Tether issuance decreases, crypto prices should fall. Must also watch Tether volume per day.

Two scenarios:

1. Tether decides to go legit: mild short term crypto price fall. Tether actually has an independent audit as much promised. Audit reveals not good, but not catastrophic.

2. Tether execs have decided to delay / obfuscate and exit when forced: continued fraudulent Tether issue and price bubble accelerates.

Something is already up: BTC price rocketed every holiday and long weekend recently. This one it is falling = no support from Tether printing?

Re: The Bit Short: Inside Crypto’s Doomsday Machine

#277
post #74

The author implies that the recent growth in tether's market cap is an indication of an incoming exit scam. A cursory glance at Coinbase's USDC's market cap [1] shows that it too is growing at almost exactly the same pace as tether's [2]. I think most players in this market would agree that Coinbase, for all of it's failings, is unlikely to be planning an exit scam at this point. It doesn't disprove the whole thesis,…

Coinbase unlikely to do an exit scam?

You mean IPO? https://finance.yahoo.com/news/coinbase-ipo-will-be-controve...

Re: The Bit Short: Inside Crypto’s Doomsday Machine

#278
post #50

I'd be very careful to take advice from this guy. 1. He's definitively bad at investing. He doesn't have an investment strategy, and probably never heard of portfolio re-balancing. 2. He got in lucky and made some good returns. Now he thinks he is a genius because of that, and as a result can predict the next market move. 3. He didn't do good market research. For example, most of the volume in USDT is faked by the ex…

Hi, I'm the author. > He doesn't have an investment strategy, and probably never heard of portfolio re-balancing. This is perhaps a reasonable inference to draw based only on the information in the article, but it is incorrect. Without going into too much detail, the missing context is that I have effective long exposure to certain markets through my ownership of founder stock in a startup that operates in those mark…

I think I agree with most of your points. I actually wrote an article about Tether in 2018 on a major investment site.

I believe Tether is organized crime and would love to see a deep investigation into the lifestyle and finances of everyone involved.

Thing is, right now, we know that more bitcoin are being purchased with REAL dollars than are being minted. So, the market has support. Yesterday, Grayscale bought 5132 bitcoin. They hold those in cold storage, so, they really bought them. I'm sure paypal, cashapp, square, also bought some.

But NO ONE in the industry has any motivation to question Tether.

The question becomes, how much bitcoin has been purchased by people that might sell it if Tether implodes. I am not sure it is a significant enough amount. Perhaps.

The current chart for bitcoin is extremely bullish. I would guess it moves up from here.

Re: The Bit Short: Inside Crypto’s Doomsday Machine

#279

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I think what you're missing is that many people are not paying market price for housing, because they bought their houses a long time ago. If they have mortgages, they were set by the home price when they bought. CPI is an average. The people who have owned their own homes for years are dragging down the average for the cost of living. You can't get the cost of living that they have if you buy today. Averages can mis…

If homebuyers are irrationally paying significantly more than it would cost to rent the same house, then that doesn't seem to me like a valid reason to inflate the indexes. If homebuyers push prices of housing up and that does increase rents, then it is a valid reason to adjust CPI upward, and they do, AFAIK.

What I'm saying is that many home owners are paying significantly less than it would take to rent the same house, because they bought decades ago.

Though of course there are also those who bought at high prices too.

If you want to know about rents, it would make sense to just look at rents. I wonder how the housing component of CPI would look if there were a survey that was limited to renters?

Re: The Bit Short: Inside Crypto’s Doomsday Machine

#280

Earlier quoted context omitted.

If homebuyers are irrationally paying significantly more than it would cost to rent the same house, then that doesn't seem to me like a valid reason to inflate the indexes. If homebuyers push prices of housing up and that does increase rents, then it is a valid reason to adjust CPI upward, and they do, AFAIK.

What I'm saying is that many home owners are paying significantly less than it would take to rent the same house, because they bought decades ago. Though of course there are also those who bought at high prices too. If you want to know about rents, it would make sense to just look at rents. I wonder how the housing component of CPI would look if there were a survey that was limited to renters?

My understanding is that the index relies on estimates of what homeowners would pay in rent for equivalent housing.

If you think longtime homeowners are paying less, then substituting equivalent rent should push the CPI rate of inflation to be higher than the genuine rate. An overestimate.

So you think correctly calculated inflation is less than the CPI says?

I thought everybody who thinks it is inaccurate thinks it is an underestimate, that the government is covering up inflation being rather high.

Also, if they just didn't survey non-renters, then the result would not include how much homeowners spend on, say, hamburgers or whatever.

Post reply on HN