The other day, I tweeted out my tin-foil-hat theory that the recent BTC runup was partly due to alt-right interests, expecting the events on the 6th to go very differently. This kind of makes me wonder even harder.
I spend time on gab and parler (I'm not a believer, I'm just curious). It really looks like it's people who genuinely feel Joe Biden will be the end of america. They think the stock market will crash and dollars will be useless as Biden ushers in some kind of communism. From the volume of comments on the posts, there's quite many of them. This run will probably last as long as their finances allow. I don't think it'l…
U.S. insurrectionists received $500k in bitcoins from French donor
61–70 of 243 posts
Re: U.S. insurrectionists received $500k in bitcoins from French donor
#62Re: U.S. insurrectionists received $500k in bitcoins from French donor
#63I hope this will get attention. Just so more people will realise that bitcoin is dangerous to use and accept because it is not private. Even if youre doing nothing wrong, would you want to unintentionally receive funds linked to this?
Same with a bas of cash, or just a transfer to your account.
Bank transfers are not a peer-to-peer system and there are processes in place for anti-moneylaundering
Re: U.S. insurrectionists received $500k in bitcoins from French donor
#64I hope this will get attention. Just so more people will realise that bitcoin is dangerous to use and accept because it is not private. Even if youre doing nothing wrong, would you want to unintentionally receive funds linked to this?
> Just so more people will realise that bitcoin is dangerous to use and accept because it is not private. So cash is just as dangerous then as it is also used by criminals?
Re: U.S. insurrectionists received $500k in bitcoins from French donor
#65I hope this will get attention. Just so more people will realise that bitcoin is dangerous to use and accept because it is not private. Even if youre doing nothing wrong, would you want to unintentionally receive funds linked to this?
Using or accepting Bitcoin is not dangerous because of this. And you have no more chance of unintentionally recieving funds linked to this than you have of unintentionally recieving cash used for criminal purposes.
(Not intending to start an argument for or against Bitcoin, and there are other pros and cons of it I'm sure, but this particular one is not really valid)
Re: U.S. insurrectionists received $500k in bitcoins from French donor
#66I hope this will get attention. Just so more people will realise that bitcoin is dangerous to use and accept because it is not private. Even if youre doing nothing wrong, would you want to unintentionally receive funds linked to this?
> Just so more people will realise that bitcoin is dangerous to use and accept because it is not private. So cash is just as dangerous then as it is also used by criminals?
Re: U.S. insurrectionists received $500k in bitcoins from French donor
#67Re: U.S. insurrectionists received $500k in bitcoins from French donor
#68And Janet Yellen received millions from wall street prior to taking over the treasury department... what has that to do with anything. Nick Fuentes is despicable, but this whole article is innuendo, the title on HN included.
Which part of the headline is not supported by statements of fact from the article? The article's own headline is about 5 times too long to appear on HN so I had to abbreviate it.
It does not provide any evidence that the recipients of the funds took part in the capitol hill riot, but instead acknowledges in lack thereof. The title claims the recipients where "involved", but the article never determines in what way.
I want to be clear, I don't defend those individuals or condone their views or actions, but just feel this article is mostly a PR stunt.
Re: U.S. insurrectionists received $500k in bitcoins from French donor
#69I hope this will get attention. Just so more people will realise that bitcoin is dangerous to use and accept because it is not private. Even if youre doing nothing wrong, would you want to unintentionally receive funds linked to this?
I'm not sure of the point here, this seems a bit nonsensical. Do you avoid using cash too because criminals use it? Using or accepting Bitcoin is not dangerous because of this. And you have no more chance of unintentionally recieving funds linked to this than you have of unintentionally recieving cash used for criminal purposes. (Not intending to start an argument for or against Bitcoin, and there are other pros and…
You can have extreme inconvenience for being linked to illegal bitcoin transactions.
Re: U.S. insurrectionists received $500k in bitcoins from French donor
#70This is inaccurate. One police officer and 4 of the rioters died on the day of the incident. Another Capitol police officer subsequently committed suicide at home for reasons that are at present unclear.