Live data from Hacker News

Ask HN: Does your employer want you to state pronouns in email signature?

news.ycombinator.com

111–120 of 150 posts

Re: Ask HN: Does your employer want you to state pronouns in email signature?

#111
It's not compulsory, but it's encouraged and the tools have been updated to make it easy to opt-in.

It's a good thing for Allies to do, as it normalizes the use of preferred pronouns in society and supports those who may need it more than others.

Re: Ask HN: Does your employer want you to state pronouns in email signature?

#113

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> I am not sure what risk you mean here and I struggle to see how a rational person can infer that I mean hatred when I introduce myself as "proactivesvcs", "Adam" or "Mr Piggott". I think that yes, everyone should feel that they can offer their pronouns, unsolicited, and I believe that we should encourage that this is an acceptable behaviour, since then eventually, it'll be something we don't even have to discuss. B…

I'm with you now. If we all open with pronouns, it speeds up the acceptance as a societal norm. I am not going to argue with you because I'm not sure there is much of an argument, heh, but I have a strong suspicion that if I were to have offered pronouns in the last say, 30 introductions I made in person, most of the other parties would be baffled, ask why, then may think they have to coach their language around me.…

I mean, you've basically nailed the challenge:

> if I were to have offered pronouns in the last say, 30 introductions I made in person, most of the other parties would be baffled, ask why, then may think they have to coach their language around me.

This is exactly what we're trying to correct. And while you may (I'm assuming this is in reference to you) be able to weather the "ginger menace" remark, I'm not sure how well that translates elsewhere.

To wit: I once had a new friend call me a terrorist in a similar manner to the aforementioned "ginger menace" introduction after a few times of having met. That was the last time we spent time together.

I feel pretty odd using the phrase in quotes. Mind if I stop? I recognize it's probably not offensive to you, but I hesitate continuing to use it.

Re: Ask HN: Does your employer want you to state pronouns in email signature?

#114
It's pointless from the practical standpoint that historically only 1/1,000 people are transgender.

That is increasing, so we'll see how common that becomes.

There is a law in Canada that specifies about 85 pronouns. If you send email to Canada, you may need to support that.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/An_Act_to_amend_the_Canadian_H...

http://www.ohrc.on.ca/en/questions-and-answers-about-gender-...

This kind of navel-gazing happens when a society becomes soft and doesn't have more immediate problems. Rome fell this way.

Re: Ask HN: Does your employer want you to state pronouns in email signature?

#115

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I'm with you now. If we all open with pronouns, it speeds up the acceptance as a societal norm. I am not going to argue with you because I'm not sure there is much of an argument, heh, but I have a strong suspicion that if I were to have offered pronouns in the last say, 30 introductions I made in person, most of the other parties would be baffled, ask why, then may think they have to coach their language around me.…

I mean, you've basically nailed the challenge: > if I were to have offered pronouns in the last say, 30 introductions I made in person, most of the other parties would be baffled, ask why, then may think they have to coach their language around me. This is exactly what we're trying to correct. And while you may (I'm assuming this is in reference to you) be able to weather the "ginger menace" remark, I'm not sure how…

Apologies for being a bit unclear. I have red hair, which in British colloquy is known as "ginger". Some take offence to the term, others revel in it as we love our hair colour. I am firmly in the latter camp and my some of my friends adopted the nickname I once gave to myself of "ginger menace" :-)

My use of this was to show that I take no offence at someone using one of my attributes as part of my identity.

Re: Ask HN: Does your employer want you to state pronouns in email signature?

#116

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I mean, you've basically nailed the challenge: > if I were to have offered pronouns in the last say, 30 introductions I made in person, most of the other parties would be baffled, ask why, then may think they have to coach their language around me. This is exactly what we're trying to correct. And while you may (I'm assuming this is in reference to you) be able to weather the "ginger menace" remark, I'm not sure how…

Apologies for being a bit unclear. I have red hair, which in British colloquy is known as "ginger". Some take offence to the term, others revel in it as we love our hair colour. I am firmly in the latter camp and my some of my friends adopted the nickname I once gave to myself of "ginger menace" :-) My use of this was to show that I take no offence at someone using one of my attributes as part of my identity.

Fair, fair. A childhood friend of mine was repeatedly bullied for having red hair, so I've become particularly sensitive to it.

Re: Ask HN: Does your employer want you to state pronouns in email signature?

#117

I work at a very left-leaning SV unicorn. Most people don’t advertise their pronouns, but quite a few do. I’m mildly peeved by this. To me the practice feels like taking off one’s lower body half garment to expose the genitalia. “See? This is my gender.” What difference does this make in a professional context? Our culture has put so much emphasis on treating all genders (or no gender) exactly the same: that was the…

Well we have to use he/she all the time in the English language in a professional context so i don't really see how it's waving your gender in everyone's face.

I do agree that there is a lot of attention focused on use of pronouns at the moment though, which is why i posed the question to learn more about community opinion in the first place.

Re: Ask HN: Does your employer want you to state pronouns in email signature?

#118
post #57

What does this mean in practice? Add what? Disclaimer: Not from US, not English speaking natively...

Email signatures would change from being Bob Jenkins - Cloud Services Developer to Bob Jenkins (she/her) - Cloud Services Developer This means that people writing about Bob don't assume that Bob is a particular gender, and helps them use the correct gender. It's a small effort to increase politeness.

So "she/her" and not traditional "Mrs."? Because the latter does not fit many people these days?

Note edit: my native tongue Finnish doesn't even have gendered he/she. Quite an uncommon thing in languages.

Re: Ask HN: Does your employer want you to state pronouns in email signature?

#119

It's not compulsory, but it's encouraged and the tools have been updated to make it easy to opt-in. It's a good thing for Allies to do, as it normalizes the use of preferred pronouns in society and supports those who may need it more than others.

> It's a good thing for Allies to do

As someone who's part of the LGBT community, "allyship" is dumb. I have friends, family and acquaintances.

I've got allies if I'm elbowing through trenches dodging gunfire.

What is this, Casablanca or Yalta?

Re: Ask HN: Does your employer want you to state pronouns in email signature?

#120
post #11

I am from Georgia, (the country not state). My coworkers are generally LGBT neutral or friendly, never heard anything bad from anyone. I personally attend most pro-LGBT rallies. In our language, the Georgian language, there is just one pronoun for all genders, so we don't care. I personally consider enforcing others' choice of specific words in their speech a generally questionable practice.

> In our language, the Georgian language, there is just one pronoun for all genders, so we don't care.

That's a nice feature! As mentioned elsewhere, some languages (e.g. German) gender literally every noun, which makes it very complicated to adapt the language to these new conventions. English is comparatively lucky in that for the most part only pronouns are gendered. In English, gendered words for professions, like "actress," went out of fashion some time ago.

Post reply on HN