Live data from Hacker News

Pirate Bay founder thinks Parler’s inability to stay online is 'embarrassing'

vice.com

21–30 of 640 posts

Re: Pirate Bay founder thinks Parler’s inability to stay online is 'embarrassing'

#21
post #18

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Not having an app does not mean that the mobile interface doesn't work.

you mean through the browser?

Until Apple decides to update Safari to block it.

Re: Pirate Bay founder thinks Parler’s inability to stay online is 'embarrassing'

#23

>In more recent years, Kolmoisoppi has moved on to fund Njalla, a privacy-centric domain name registration service. One he says was already asked to host Parler, and refused. >“Of course we wouldn't,” Kolmisoppi said. “We're pro human rights, which includes the right to not be killed by extreme right wing terrorists.” Why do I see this embarrassing justification so often? It doesn't make sense to equate speech with v…

[flagged]

Re: Pirate Bay founder thinks Parler’s inability to stay online is 'embarrassing'

#24
post #12

> Embarrassing The site not being online may be embarrassing from a risk management standpoint, but the app being censored from Apple Store and Google Play Store prevents them from having a meaningful presence ever again anyway.

> but the app being censored from Apple Store and Google Play Store prevents them from having a meaningful presence ever again anyway

Right, like OnlyFans has no meaningful presence

Re: Pirate Bay founder thinks Parler’s inability to stay online is 'embarrassing'

#25
post #16
post #12

> Embarrassing The site not being online may be embarrassing from a risk management standpoint, but the app being censored from Apple Store and Google Play Store prevents them from having a meaningful presence ever again anyway.

Why not just use a web app? I don’t have the Twitter app installed because the web app does everything I need.

They have a Progressive Web App, which should be able to be loaded up and a home screen shortcut just like any app would. But it's not straight forward for Android (Parler users were trying to explain how to do it to each other with hilarious results), and I believe on Apple it can't be done.

There have been called for regulating how Apple and Google protect their app stores after Parler was pulled, but I don't think that's the solution. The solution is getting them to integrate PWAs into their ecosystem. They don't want to, because it draws from their app store revenue.

Re: Pirate Bay founder thinks Parler’s inability to stay online is 'embarrassing'

#26

Parler decided not to buy their own hardware and rent their own rack space. Plenty of other unpopular websites have figured it out.

My guess is they won't struggle too much to get the site itself back online (they at least claim it was "bare metal", so charitably just containers), but replacing the email service providers and other authentication / SaaSy bits will be a challenge.

Re: Pirate Bay founder thinks Parler’s inability to stay online is 'embarrassing'

#28

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Until Apple decides to update Safari to block it.

Please point out which websites have been blocked in browsers.

At this point - do you really think Apple is above this?

Re: Pirate Bay founder thinks Parler’s inability to stay online is 'embarrassing'

#29

Parler was, at the end of the day, a somewhat amateurish Twitter clone whose essential growth hack was that they decided to serve as a kind of ban evasion mechanism for Twitter. They had virtually no organic growth of their own, they worked by accepting the banned castoffs from another service and promising not to do any moderation. And then we had a historical incident of political violence perpetrated by the same d…

Not sure why the downvotes. This essentially is the same as my take. This is the inevitable result of pushing your brand as "no content moderation" but not actually having any skills or plans on what to do when it eventually caught up with them.

Anyone familiar with 4chan knows that some of the earliest content that was banned on the platform include childporn and organizing raids/doxxing. If you read the terms of service, you'll see that content is still banned (even if not uniformly enforced).

The fact that parler couldn't muster even 4chan levels of moderation shows you that they really had no comprehension of the content creators they would be courting with their service.

Post reply on HN