31–40 of 126 posts
It blows my mind that a chat client is worth over 26 times what Boston Dynamics is.
The number of active users is one of the most enticing metric a VC firm can lay its eyes on.
Edit: For context, the parent comment is talking about Salesforces' acquisition of Slack [0]
It blows my mind that a chat client is worth over 26 times what Boston Dynamics is.
It blows my mind that a chat client is worth over 26 times what Boston Dynamics is.
A neat reminder that most Mergers and Acquisitions are money losing and that robots on legs are a neat idea but mostly useless
Legs are an over-engineered solution if your only use-case is a nice, flat surface. Outdoors, or even indoors with random flights of stairs thrown in, they make sense as a robust and effective solution.
It blows my mind that a chat client is worth over 26 times what Boston Dynamics is.
I realize Korea is an ally, but this seems like tech we wouldn't want to lose the domestic capability to produce. Or tech we wouldn't want to cede the lead on. Why would Darpa pour so much money in for this outcome?
It blows my mind that a chat client is worth over 26 times what Boston Dynamics is.
There are lots of ways to determine value. I do not think that we are ever going to come to a consensus on the best one, but at least we can strive to understand and be understood.
Makes sense. South Korea, where Hyundai is based, has by far the most robots per manufacturing employee [1]. They will make good use of the technology. [1] https://specials-images.forbesimg.com/imageserve/5f719cf9f44...