The Xfce file manager, Thunar, has thumbnails. For casual use at least, it is very similar to the Gnome file manager.
The post isn't actually about GNOME's file manager (which does have thumbnails), it's about the GTK file picker which is the same in any DE.
GNOME has no thumbnails in the file picker and my toilets are blocked
61–70 of 756 posts
Re: GNOME has no thumbnails in the file picker and my toilets are blocked
#62Re: GNOME has no thumbnails in the file picker and my toilets are blocked
#63The Xfce file manager, Thunar, has thumbnails. For casual use at least, it is very similar to the Gnome file manager.
Re: GNOME has no thumbnails in the file picker and my toilets are blocked
#64Install PCManFM and that will do; an extremely lightweight File Manager which I happen to use parallel with Thunar.
Re: GNOME has no thumbnails in the file picker and my toilets are blocked
#65There's more serious reasons this file picker is broken. Here's a trivial to reproduce and obvious issue that's been there for several years now: 1. Open a directory that loads slowly (e.g. one with thousands of files on a smb3 mount) 2. While the list is loading, select a file (but do not open it) 3. Wait for the whole list to load Once the list finishes loading, the file on the very top of the list gets automatical…
There is a lag when hitting and the last is processed out of order :/
Re: GNOME has no thumbnails in the file picker and my toilets are blocked
#66So I just checked on my install (Gnome 3.38.2, Debian testing) and all the GTKFileChooser windows I could find had the thumbnails representing the underlying images. Interestingly I checked a few apps I have installed through Flatpak, and they generally didn't have thumbnails for the same dialogues, although sometimes did for the "recents". Unless this has been recently added as a feature, it sounds more like he has…
Re: GNOME has no thumbnails in the file picker and my toilets are blocked
#67In this time and age, do we really need "desktops"? If you only need a full-screen terminal and a full-screen browser (as is the case for many people), the whole desktop thing is unnecessary clutter.
Terminals are probably never again going to be the primary computing interface for most people.
So what? Neither are desktops! The question is that the total number of terminal users is certainly increasing year after year.
Re: GNOME has no thumbnails in the file picker and my toilets are blocked
#68You will find lots of such examples of a feature which you personally find very important and wonder why such a simple thing is not supported yet. I guess everyone has such examples. And you will also find such examples for MacOSX or Windows. For me personally, I wonder why mouse wheel/scroll acceleration is still not implemented. I implemented it a while ago for Xorg, which is outdated now, and also the maintainer w…
There are a huge variety of laptops with different size trackpads, different positions, varying levels of palm rejection etc but there's zero customisability around this seemingly simple behaviour.
My Windows dualboot has no such issue and macOS of course (using a MacBook) works fantastically without this limitations.
Re: GNOME has no thumbnails in the file picker and my toilets are blocked
#69Re: GNOME has no thumbnails in the file picker and my toilets are blocked
#70> One might also say "Just use KDE!" Yeah, I guess I could use KDE, just like I use the downstairs toilet instead of the other ones. Yeah but when you go to the downstairs toilet you can't bring in your favourite newspaper because the paper its printed on isn't compatible with the light bulb and you can't read it. Firefox on KDE uses the GTK filepicker. No thumbnails.
Not if you set the GTK_USE_PORTAL environment variable.
$ GTK_USE_PORTAL=1 firefox
The above will make Firefox use the KDE filepicker.