Live data from Hacker News

Is graphene a miracle material?

news.bbc.co.uk

21–30 of 53 posts

Re: Is graphene a miracle material?

#21
I want clothing embedded with sheets of Graphene. Imagine the protection! I ride a motorcycle, which is one of the most dangerous daily activities one can do, and something that exhibits these properties could save me a lot of pain in wearing armored gear etc.

There are also a range of applications in the military and security industries.

Re: Is graphene a miracle material?

#22

Graphene and, more generally, carbon nanotubes are exciting because they have something-for-everyone. Silicon, plastics, water are examples of molecules or structures that have also been spun into important applications for just about every vertical. I suspect we'll seem carbon nanotube products explode over the next 20 years just as plastics did over the last 40. The article focuses a bit on whether graphene can rep…

We have more important high-tech ventures to fund over here, such as location-based social photo sharing services.

In all seriousness, though, I think we're at a point with graphene comparable to the earliest days of the integrated circuit. We can imagine faster and smaller adding machines, but we can't quite yet imagine an IBM PC running VisiCalc. And the iPhone isn't even science fiction yet.

Re: Is graphene a miracle material?

#23
post #20
post #18

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I hate to be that guy but: "megaton |ˈmegəˌtən| noun a unit of explosive power chiefly used for nuclear weapons, equivalent to one million tons of TNT"

You're being that guy. Plus, you're wrong. Mega- is a standard SI prefix, and the use of "megaton" to denote one million tons is entirely correct. Yes, it's also true that "megaton" has a second meaning. This fact does not invalidate its other meaning. In fact, if you bother looking this up in actual dictionaries, you'll find that the normal mass definition is often listed first, and the explosive definition is liste…

Wow, sorry man. Didn't mean to waste your time/bother you. I just looked it up in the dictionary I had handy, as the wording seemed strange to me.

In any case, I am glad I learned something new today!

Re: Is graphene a miracle material?

#24
post #16

Optical computers, genetic catalogs, nanorepair modules--forget all of that. It's when you see a megaton of steel suspended over your head by a thread the thickness of a human hair that you really find God in technology. * Anonymous Metagenics Dockworker - MorganLink 3DVision Live Interview

I'll be that other guy, because I found the visualization interesting. It's a bit off, but it'd still be mind-bending to see:

>... [the equivalent of] 6422 kg on a cable with cross-section of 1 mm2

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carbon_nanotube#Strength

Re: Is graphene a miracle material?

#25
post #21

I want clothing embedded with sheets of Graphene. Imagine the protection! I ride a motorcycle, which is one of the most dangerous daily activities one can do, and something that exhibits these properties could save me a lot of pain in wearing armored gear etc. There are also a range of applications in the military and security industries.

Graphene wouldn't provide any shock absorption. For that, try looking at something like d3o:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9VDeJ7rLUYU

Re: Is graphene a miracle material?

#26
post #21

I want clothing embedded with sheets of Graphene. Imagine the protection! I ride a motorcycle, which is one of the most dangerous daily activities one can do, and something that exhibits these properties could save me a lot of pain in wearing armored gear etc. There are also a range of applications in the military and security industries.

Isn't most of motorcycle safety designed to a) make sure no part of you catches the ground and b) spread out the energy as much as possible (spatially and temporally)? Cause I don't think just sheets of graphene would be very good at dealing with energy dissipation. You might not be able to break the graphene sheets, but the energy would just transfer through to your body.

Re: Is graphene a miracle material?

#27
post #12

If IBM can make a 150 GHz graphene transistor, why does Dr Phaedon Avouris, of IBM, say that it cannot replace silicon? Isn't clock frequency a measure of the transistor's ability to turn on and off quickly?

There's so much more than clock frequency. The place silicon shines isn't so much it's material properties for producing individual switches - they're good, but there's better out there. It's the raw manufacturability that silicon has. It's by far the easiest material to work with. It's abundant, cheap, and easy to obtain. It's got properties that lend it to easy junction doping and easy annealing. It's easy to depos…

How much of the ease of using silicon is due to its inherent properties, and how much is due to the many billions that have been sunk into R&D?

Re: Is graphene a miracle material?

#28
post #20
post #18

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I hate to be that guy but: "megaton |ˈmegəˌtən| noun a unit of explosive power chiefly used for nuclear weapons, equivalent to one million tons of TNT"

You're being that guy. Plus, you're wrong. Mega- is a standard SI prefix, and the use of "megaton" to denote one million tons is entirely correct. Yes, it's also true that "megaton" has a second meaning. This fact does not invalidate its other meaning. In fact, if you bother looking this up in actual dictionaries, you'll find that the normal mass definition is often listed first, and the explosive definition is liste…

Wouldn't it be correctly called a "megatonne", as SI prefixes aren't typically applied to imperial units?

Re: Is graphene a miracle material?

#29
post #20

Earlier quoted context omitted.

You're being that guy. Plus, you're wrong. Mega- is a standard SI prefix, and the use of "megaton" to denote one million tons is entirely correct. Yes, it's also true that "megaton" has a second meaning. This fact does not invalidate its other meaning. In fact, if you bother looking this up in actual dictionaries, you'll find that the normal mass definition is often listed first, and the explosive definition is liste…

Wouldn't it be correctly called a "megaton ne ", as SI prefixes aren't typically applied to imperial units?

For some reason, people write megaton and mean a metric megaton. Megaton as a TNT-equivalent also refers to a metric tonne.

But (Sid Meier's Alpha Centauri) is an American game and it could actually refer to a non-metric megaton

Re: Is graphene a miracle material?

#30

If IBM can make a 150 GHz graphene transistor, why does Dr Phaedon Avouris, of IBM, say that it cannot replace silicon? Isn't clock frequency a measure of the transistor's ability to turn on and off quickly?

Hz isn't the only important parameter of a transistor; amplification factor (or what's it called) is another, and IIRC graphene transistor didn't really perform in this area.
Post reply on HN