Cabal: A peer-to-peer, off-grid, community-first, hackable chat platform
1–10 of 337 posts
Re: Cabal: A peer-to-peer, off-grid, community-first, hackable chat platform
#2Re: Cabal: A peer-to-peer, off-grid, community-first, hackable chat platform
#3Re: Cabal: A peer-to-peer, off-grid, community-first, hackable chat platform
#4Have there been any breakthroughs recently? Or just sharing to share?
Web technology has a certain responsibility, so I think all the alternative communication tech is in response to the theme of this week.
Re: Cabal: A peer-to-peer, off-grid, community-first, hackable chat platform
#5Have there been any breakthroughs recently? Or just sharing to share?
I presume it's someone trying to offer Cabal as a Parler alternative.
Re: Cabal: A peer-to-peer, off-grid, community-first, hackable chat platform
#6Have there been any breakthroughs recently? Or just sharing to share?
Probably not a coincidence that this gets posted with no context the day that Parler gets kicked off AWS. I presume it's someone trying to offer Cabal as a Parler alternative.
Re: Cabal: A peer-to-peer, off-grid, community-first, hackable chat platform
#7Re: Cabal: A peer-to-peer, off-grid, community-first, hackable chat platform
#8Interesting project. How does it compare to Briar https://briarproject.org/ ?
Of course, Cabal being written in javascript is also a major minus. As an oldschool Unix hacker, I don't really get the node.js fixation for command line tools. It's a certainty that they'll never be used by a significant chunk of knowledgeable, expert Unix users that want nothing to do with node.
Finally, there is no protocol documentation anywhere that I can see. This is yet another way that these modern tools fail spectacularly. In the golden age of the Internet, published protocol documentation that allowed for multiple clients to be developed was the norm rather than the exception. Which led to robust, long living protocols and services (e.g. IRC).
Even though we're being drowned in apps, this isn't happening today and we're worse off for it.