Live data from Hacker News

Apple has threatened to ban Parler from the App Store

buzzfeednews.com

21–30 of 1001 posts

Re: Apple has threatened to ban Parler from the App Store

#22
There's an amusing irony in the downvotes in this thread. The champions of free-speech angry that Apple might ban a platform for speech that ultimately led to an attempted insurrection? These champions of free speech seem to be agressively trying to silence anybody happy about this news.

Re: Apple has threatened to ban Parler from the App Store

#24
post #11

Someone brought an interesting perspective in another thread and I can't shake it off. The other side keeps deplatforming them. Their legal cases are rejected. The mainstream media refuses to take them seriously. We're not even listening to them, because it's science and they're *ists if they disagree. We're not debating anymore. We just assume we're right. We are slowly squeezing a significant segment of the populat…

Yah. IMO-- only the most directly dangerous stuff -- incitements to violence-- should be removed. If you chase them out of Twitter, they'll make an even worse echo-chamber.

> Their legal cases are rejected. The mainstream media refuses to take them seriously.

> If you deny them the usual channels, is it surprising that they take the other route?

On the other hand, if what they're asserting is crazy and unsupported by fact, what's the alternative? Report it uncritically as part of "both sides"? Listen to them in court and give them relief anyways?

Re: Apple has threatened to ban Parler from the App Store

#26

I'm honestly curious - where is the line drawn between a service being used to do "questionable" things and it being removed? We can all agree, for example, that the internet at large enables many bad things, but I doubt any of us would ban the internet (though in other countries this happens). What about reddit? A specific subreddit? A specific post? A specific user? A specific post by a specific user at a specific…

> I'm honestly curious - where is the line drawn between a service being used to do "questionable" things and it being removed?

Whether or not it's "right leaning".

Re: Apple has threatened to ban Parler from the App Store

#27
post #18
post #8

Thank fucking god. These tech companies were complicit in an incompetent but serious insurrection attempt. Better late than never, but they must have known things were going to get bad. The right and the associated white supremists have far too much freedom to spread disinformation, racism and hatred. I'm sure we'll see free speech absolutists in arms about this, but today is a good day for democracy.

I really hope this is sarcasm.

Parler is incapable and unwilling to moderate nazis, white supremacists and terrorists. Worse, they thrive on those users.

First they came for the nazis, and I didn't say anything because, well, fuck nazis. Then end.

Re: Apple has threatened to ban Parler from the App Store

#28
First they came for the socialists, and I did not speak out—because I was not a socialist.

Then they came for the trade unionists, and I did not speak out— because I was not a trade unionist.

Then they came for the Jews, and I did not speak out—because I was not a Jew.

Then they came for me—and there was no one left to speak for me.

Re: Apple has threatened to ban Parler from the App Store

#29

I'm honestly curious - where is the line drawn between a service being used to do "questionable" things and it being removed? We can all agree, for example, that the internet at large enables many bad things, but I doubt any of us would ban the internet (though in other countries this happens). What about reddit? A specific subreddit? A specific post? A specific user? A specific post by a specific user at a specific…

Parler is (or was) the #1 downloaded app on the App Store, according to some metrics. You don't need an algorithm to see that. It's a PR nightmare, and this is the common sense thing for any global brand to do

Re: Apple has threatened to ban Parler from the App Store

#30
Before anyone starts complaining about censorship or free speech in the context of the first amendment, I'll just leave this here: https://www.theverge.com/2019/6/17/18682099/supreme-court-ru...

Along with the actual text from the constition:

AMENDMENT I

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.

Post reply on HN