We need more than deplatforming
blog.mozilla.org
We need more than deplatforming
1–10 of 83 posts
Re: We need more than deplatforming
#2Indeed. Maybe communications platforms, even private ones, should be carved out of the general ability to deny service. We have similar notions already, e.g., libel plaintiffs who are public figures must prove malice.
Even if one disagrees with whatever that communication is, we should recognize that stifling it, even when done by a private entity and not the state, sows distrust.
Re: We need more than deplatforming
#3Re: We need more than deplatforming
#4Re: We need more than deplatforming
#5It truly gives me shivers down my spine...
Re: We need more than deplatforming
#6I really don't recognize the society that we are moving towards. People are welcoming censorship with open arms. Twitter and other social media are the public spaces of the internet. Deplatforming someone there is essentially as if the governments bans the public speech of someone in the "real" world. It truly gives me shivers down my spine...
Re: We need more than deplatforming
#7So long! Glad to see your tiny market share approach 0 a bit quicker.
Re: We need more than deplatforming
#8I really don't recognize the society that we are moving towards. People are welcoming censorship with open arms. Twitter and other social media are the public spaces of the internet. Deplatforming someone there is essentially as if the governments bans the public speech of someone in the "real" world. It truly gives me shivers down my spine...
The Mozilla blog post you are replying about is suggesting increasing transparency , not suggesting more censorship.
Re: We need more than deplatforming
#9I really don't recognize the society that we are moving towards. People are welcoming censorship with open arms. Twitter and other social media are the public spaces of the internet. Deplatforming someone there is essentially as if the governments bans the public speech of someone in the "real" world. It truly gives me shivers down my spine...
The Mozilla blog post you are replying about is suggesting increasing transparency , not suggesting more censorship.