Live data from Hacker News

Tether price manipulation

twitter.com

261–270 of 490 posts

Re: Tether price manipulation

#261
post #226

The problem is that in the early days of @Bitfinex'ed this was all a bit of a sideshow because there was genuinely large interest from retail and the outcome of crypto was far less certain. However three years on, crypto still does not have a "killer app" and is 99.99% used for speculation. Bitcoin's narrative has had to morph from "digital currency" to "digital gold". But in the depths of the March panic, Tether jum…

How do you square this with the observation that other fiat-backed stablecoins like USDC, which are obviously legitimate, are also printing massively? It would seem to me that if transparent stablecoins with utility are going up, the simplest explanation for tether going up is that it serves the same role for people who have either become accustomed to it from its earlier availability, or have it as their only option…

Except for timing time after time. Most rallies have a corresponding Tether print right prior to them.

Re: Tether price manipulation

#262
post #201

OP gives no proof that Tether is not holding 1:1 reserves. There is, however, a good proof that they do: Tether has held the 1:1 beg pretty well recently. Bitcoin price dropped to $4.000 last year and Tether exchange rate has held pretty well. It is important to mention that USDT is still liquid despite the lack of USD on/off-ramps. People regularly sell USDT on the offline market, and can exchange to USDC on many ex…

If Tether Ltd. had at any point in time made any significant USDT -> USD redemptions that outweighed the new USDT given out to new buyers, we should have seen that by a significant number of Tethers being destroyed. Looking at the historic Tether market cap on CoinMarketCap - which is practically equal to all non-destroyed tethers due to USDT being pegged to the USD - however does not reveal any significant drop in T…

Posting this again: https://coinmarketcap.com/currencies/tether/

They did redeem from 2.8bn to 1.7bn. Which is like 40% of their total value at the time. Is that significant enough?

Re: Tether price manipulation

#263

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> backed by literally nothing It is the only thing the government accepts for tax payments. Given that you can be arrested for not paying your taxes it is "backed" by the barrel of a gun, a threat to your very being. In one sense this is the only real thing there is.

Gold and silver became money for similar reasons (probably). Kings and Emperors found that supplying their armies was much easier (especially in peace time) if they used the method of taxing the population in gold and/or silver and then using that to pay their soldiers who would supply themselves on the open market. That way you did not have the standard problems of a planned economy. The peasants have now need for g…

Maybe they didn't have any intrinsic value in the past besides looking pretty but in the modern era both gold and silver have industrial uses. They are not just stores of value. One could also argue that both metals also had intrinsic value in the past since both metals were used in jewelry and various items to make them look good.

Re: Tether price manipulation

#264
post #105

Earlier quoted context omitted.

like I mentioned above, it is speculated that they are the ones who are printing the tether, then use that to buy bitcoin. They are then probably hoping that whoever receives tether for selling their bitcoin does not immediately want usd, but instead is happy with the tether as it is 'backed 1:1'. (Again, I have to stress that this is a theory i read somewhere on the internet, while lots of things add up, it may also…

Do they even allow exchanging tether for USD? I dont think they do

Tether does not, but you can trade USDT/USD pair on kraken.com

Re: Tether price manipulation

#265

Earlier quoted context omitted.

That's gonna be the killer app, low-cost global payments, finally we can accept international payments from non-crypto customers without ridiculous SWIFT or PayPal fees... https://jimmymow.medium.com/announcing-strike-global-2392b90...

Most global payments are transactions, not cash transfers, and the transacting parties have banking relationships that make those transfers low cost and strictly superior to Bitcoin.

As a freelancer based in EU working on some US projects, I'm forced to pay 5.5% fee to PayPal or some fix fee to the banks (SWIFT payment). Plus conversion fee from USD to EUR (or my local currency).

That's too high for just a simple thing as receiving money from different country. Really looking forward for that Strike Global.

Re: Tether price manipulation

#266
post #174

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I understand the deflation part, but my question really was is it an economy the size of the united states even possible if we stayed on the gold standard.

Not having enough money to transact would definitely have suppressed our economic growth, but then again maybe we would have gotten really good at mining for gold to make up for it

"Really good at mining." This might be good point to compare with BTC. Where huge amounts of electricity is spend on doing essentially useless calculations, outside keeping the system safe and running.

Good at mining would have meant spending good part of our economic output to mine gold and then just storing it somewhere or moving it around...

Re: Tether price manipulation

#267
post #135

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The killer app for Bitcoin is escaping government fiat money that is backed by literally nothing at all and is being printed at increasingly alarming rates. 40% of all USD ever created were “made” in 2020. That will have repercussions for decades and isn’t a currency I want to stay in. https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/M1 Ironically (or not) Bitcoin was created in 2009 right when that graph gets really crazy.

I have a question, isn't the problem with the gold standard that the amount of dollars is fixed and in order to have enough currency to drive a rapidly growing economy you would in essence be buying a gallon of milk for .25 cents? It seems to me that either you the amount of currency in circulation needs to increase or the value of the existing currency needs to increase. Taking into account the gold standard was use…

[deleted]

Re: Tether price manipulation

#268
post #170

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Investopedia has: >Fiat money is a government-issued currency that isn't backed by a commodity such as gold. Tether fails the government-issued bit.

In what meaningful way is Tether not a fiat currency?

It is meaningful, because a large part of crypto culture seems to be based around hand-waving and selling you an underdog no-big-government empower-the-people story

Re: Tether price manipulation

#269
post #2

While correlation is not causation, correlation is evidence for causation... and there's a lot of correlation in those graphs.

It literally is not.

But it is

There are several algorithms that calculate the causal structure from correlations: PC, GES, FGS, FCI

They are proven to be asymptotically correct

Re: Tether price manipulation

#270
The twitter thread is utterly fatuous, and another post this morning on reddit laid it out pretty well:

> This is just dumb but I'll lay it out anyway: The NY AG issued the first Tether subpoena in Dec 2017. The AG got the financial info, found that tether was fully backed by dollars, and that the Tether company lent some of those dollars to the Bitfinex company, which is the basis of the NY AG lawsuit. Bitfinex has since issued tokens to cover the loan.

To say that the NY AG got the subpoena info (which would require more evidence than an audit and be under penalties of perjury as well) found no backing and let them continue a ponzi is to say that the NY AG is part of the conspiracy. So enough with the tin foil hattery.

https://www.reddit.com/r/BitcoinMarkets/comments/ksvlc3/dail...

Post reply on HN