If you want to know more, I recommend the virology lectures from Vincent Racianello: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F0n8SeeC4II
How the placenta evolved from an ancient virus
31–40 of 111 posts
Re: How the placenta evolved from an ancient virus
#32source: i too can make things up and claim 'scientz'
Re: How the placenta evolved from an ancient virus
#33I'm just realizing that several shark and snake species also give birth to live young, but I don't know whether they have placentas or similar structures. I'm sure they couldn't be homologous to mammal placentas, right? (Certainly not if this article is right about the timeline.) To what extent do viviparous animals converge when it comes to the mother/child interface? So some sharks have placentas, as mentioned in t…
Seahorses are also interesting in this regard, not only do they also have internal pregnancy and a placenta-like structure, it's also the males that get pregnant.
Re: How the placenta evolved from an ancient virus
#34Re: How the placenta evolved from an ancient virus
#35Re: How the placenta evolved from an ancient virus
#36Re: How the placenta evolved from an ancient virus
#37Earlier quoted context omitted.
Seahorses are also interesting in this regard, not only do they also have internal pregnancy and a placenta-like structure, it's also the males that get pregnant.
Sorry for asking a simple question, but how do we distinguish sexes? If male seahorses can be pregnant, it's obviously not by which sex gives birth.
Re: How the placenta evolved from an ancient virus
#38Re: How the placenta evolved from an ancient virus
#39Earlier quoted context omitted.
Viruses are ultimately bits of genetic code wrapped in a shell and injection mechanism. IANAB, so this is pure conjecture, but: it wouldn't surprise me if it turned out that viruses are a kind of degenerative state - something evolution may just spit out as it makes mistakes trying to improve on cells. If that's the case, then viruses may exist simply because they are a waste product of natural selection of more comp…
This implies that evolution has a goal and that we are that goal. This shows a fundamental misunderstanding of evolution of natural selection that is common. Who is to say that viruses won't be the end result of life on the planet earth? Complex life more evolved life. It's just differently evolved.
The way I imagine my idea is that, if you pick a species and its interesting descendants, and order on a timeline like such:
A --> B --> C --> D
What really happens is more like: [bunch of other spinoffs]
^
|
A --> B --> ...
And that some of those spinoff could be viruses. Imagine a mutation to A causes a bunch of functionality in the organism to shut down (and in subsequent generations disappear), while leaving a viable organism. For a sufficiently uncomplicated A, the result of such mutation could be a bundle of genes wrapped in a shell with an injection mechanism. That's a virus.Re: How the placenta evolved from an ancient virus
#40Earlier quoted context omitted.
Seahorses are also interesting in this regard, not only do they also have internal pregnancy and a placenta-like structure, it's also the males that get pregnant.
Sorry for asking a simple question, but how do we distinguish sexes? If male seahorses can be pregnant, it's obviously not by which sex gives birth.