Earlier quoted context omitted.
Brilliant!
He's an analyst for "the right", that's why he's so brilliant.
CIA vs. Wikileaks [video]
221–230 of 299 posts
Re: CIA vs. Wikileaks [video]
#222At one point I programmed from the same cafe almost daily for much of a year. A mid-level drug dealer decided to setup shop in the cafe, often sitting near me. His street dealers would come in about once a week for a pow-wow where they'd all exchange cheap burner phones for new ones he'd supply, backpack was overflowing with phones. I always wore headphones so never really overheard their discussions, and never wanted to invite conversation, so I just ignored this hoping it'd just go away as these things tend to constantly move around. I'd always see some illicit activity in every cafe I worked from often enough, so it wasn't too surprising.
Then one day things got crazy with him running out to the nearby clifftop carrying massive binoculars looking over the Pacific ocean, running back in talking on his phone about locations and times of a shipment and trucks dumping "meth shit", it was like a breaking bad episode irl. Everyone in the cafe saw this happening, he was well on the road to getting busted for being so obvious in public. Something had gone wrong with a pickup and he was having a sort of crisis right there in the open, making all these calls and yelling at people about the situation.
I ended up mentioning it to the owners who seemed ignorant of this happening in their cafe, as they employed lackeys to run the place and were rarely around. They were furious and clearly intended to do something about it, especially when they realized he was a local guy they knew who went to school with their son.
So I avoided the cafe for some time after that. Maybe a month or so goes by and I start testing the waters, guy seems completely gone, all better right?
Not quite. Unfamiliar people started showing up at the cafe hovering around me, following me, asking about my phone, phone starts malfunctioning, asking about my laptop, totally obvious and annoying shit. They'd come in and sometimes just sit right across from me without ordering anything more than a single paper cup of black coffee just to have ordered something, and keep checking their watch. Right at the stroke of 5, up and walk out, they were working shifts and eager to leave. When I'd switch to another nearby cafe, they'd miss me for a few days then start appearing there too. When you spend enough time in a small local cafe over years you recognize the locals, you know the customer patterns, this kind of thing sticks out like a sore thumb.
All this just because I was in proximity to this bullshit happening in a cafe I frequented. Though, the fact that I was at the cafe nearly every day and probably appeared to not have a legitimate income source I'm sure didn't help. But I wasn't doing anything illegal, just taking a break from the SV grind.
What I learned was that there's substantial resources thrown at this style of policing. It's like a dust-devil blowing around to wherever some shit goes down, and whoever's nearby becomes a person of interest. Eventually it will blow on to another priority, but until it does you're annoyed by its invasion into your personal life.
I don't remember how long this went on for (if I ever really knew). I ended up stopping going to these cafes for months, just programming from my apt instead, and disposing of that phone not long after it started malfunctioning, simply going phoneless for a very long time. Fortunately my thinkpad never seemed to be affected, though I'm sure I retired it earlier than I would have otherwise.
Re: CIA vs. Wikileaks [video]
#223Re: CIA vs. Wikileaks [video]
#224Re: CIA vs. Wikileaks [video]
#225Earlier quoted context omitted.
He's an analyst for "the right", that's why he's so brilliant.
"Be skeptical of intelligence agencies" shouldn't be a political perspective.
Re: CIA vs. Wikileaks [video]
#226More than half way through watching this. Why doesn't this guy just fit cameras around his home?
Re: CIA vs. Wikileaks [video]
#227More than half way through watching this. Why doesn't this guy just fit cameras around his home?
One of the questions from chat asked him exactly that. His answer was that he already lives in a government-sector in Berlin where he doesn't need cameras to feel safe at home. The main argument of this talk was about his experiences when he travelled abroad (UK/US) and experienced the surveillance and intimidation.
Re: CIA vs. Wikileaks [video]
#228Earlier quoted context omitted.
> I don't believe is worth fighting police during a demonstration. As many protesters will tell you, in a lot of cases the police start the fight. Are you saying you're okay with them being able to just silence you? What do you propose doing when they use violence to shut down your protest?
Sorry, I do not believe the police in uniform are the ones who start the fight. Not in my (democratic) country, at least. Instead, you need to announce a permit for a demonstration. If you don't have one, the police will tell you to leave the premise. If you fail to comply, you might get arrested, even if you don't use violence. But the part where protestors fail to comply with (reasonable and legal) instructions by…
If they did, you would see police initiating physical violence against a group of otherwise non-violent protesters.
> Instead, you need to...
Or else, you would see police initiating physical violence against a group of otherwise non-violent protesters.
In a brutal dictatorship, violent suppression of dissent is direct and obvious. In your democratic country it is hidden among "reasonable and legal" stages; this keeps the Good Citizens [1] obedient and sincere.
----
Re: CIA vs. Wikileaks [video]
#229Earlier quoted context omitted.
This is really interesting to me because of the way the information age seems to have collapsed claims and evidence into one another. I was actually recently discussing this with a friend and we formulates three rules: 1) Claims of neutrality are evidence against being neutral 2) performance of neutrality is evidence of neutrality 3) blind adherence to neutrality is evidence of not understanding the goals of neutrali…
I think you could just have one rule instead, which is also taught to beginning journalists if I'm not mistaken: Everybody is biased. Always. There are no exceptions to this rule.
Re: CIA vs. Wikileaks [video]
#230I am afraid the real world journalists don't care too much about Wikileak. I am afraid that's how I feel this way. To me, Wikileak is the real meat journalists, no speculation, no opinion, just information, data for people to process. But we don't want it, we want to read tldr;, one sentence is something I am interested to read about a topic. Journalists know that, they rather publish unchecked facts, as long as it g…
Did you miss that WikiLeaks met with Trump campaign staff that had close relations with russian secret services and then leaked DNC campaign mails so that right wing actors could make that into a pedophile pizza place conspiracy theory? I used to be a big WikiLeaks supporter but these days are long gone. They promised leaks on russian oligarchs that never happened. They promised to "bring down" Bank of America. They…
Political campaign staff and people with ties to secret services seem like the exact sorts journalists should be meeting with. If they're one and the same even better.