Live data from Hacker News

The Tale of a ‘Normal’ Person: A Reality Check

socialbias.com

11–20 of 39 posts

Re: The Tale of a ‘Normal’ Person: A Reality Check

#11
post #10
post #8

Earlier quoted context omitted.

They expect things to work intuitively right out of the box 20% or so of mobile handsets are returned to the shop. Rarely are they defective but just too difficult to use correctly. (The percentage varies by handset, I can't find the article I learnt this from at the moment)

I remember that stat and I can believe it. The interfaces on those cell phones sucks :S

I've got a bog-standard cell phone (Razr) and I still get tripped up by the interface. I hate it!

Re: The Tale of a ‘Normal’ Person: A Reality Check

#12

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It might just be you. This post seems pretty clearly to be from someone who get Geoffrey A. Moore's thesis in "Crossing the Chasm" - there are a VAST number of consumers out there that are NOT techie/early adopters and don't understand things in the way that we techie/early adopters do. If you don't plan on how to include that segment, then your startup is in trouble.

Flip Video: 13 percent of the camcorder market

The Flip is a fantastic example. We need something like that for digital cameras.

Re: The Tale of a ‘Normal’ Person: A Reality Check

#14
post #13

This was my thinking 2004-2007 and was my biggest mistake. Targeting late adopters has not proven to be a successful strategy. http://friendfeed.com/e/41230d54-d425-07c8-38a3-4bada029126b

I think the idea is that early adopters can evangelize your product and create its foothold, but it's the late adopters who play mass market kingmakers.

Re: The Tale of a ‘Normal’ Person: A Reality Check

#15
post #14
post #13

This was my thinking 2004-2007 and was my biggest mistake. Targeting late adopters has not proven to be a successful strategy. http://friendfeed.com/e/41230d54-d425-07c8-38a3-4bada029126b

I think the idea is that early adopters can evangelize your product and create its foothold, but it's the late adopters who play mass market kingmakers.

this is key. Look at Google. they target technical types, but for joe average, their product is just as usable as the compitition, who explicitly targets the average user.

Joe average is going to have a technical person setup his computer- If that technical person, say, makes firefox the default browser, assuming it mostly works, joe average is going to use firefox. This might also be why OSX is doing so much better than previous macOS versions. Whenever a non-technical person asks me for a laptop reccomendation, I tell them to get a mac, in part because I know they might come to me for help (and I'll be damned if I start rooting around in a windows box that isn't properly backed up. Reboot, reboot, then format and reinstall, I say.)

the other side of this is that it needs to work for joe average... this is why Linux on the desktop took so long to take off (it looks like it's getting a toehold in the low-end- by 'just working' for simple tasks) even now, linux on the desktop only 'just works' if you don't need commercial software.

so yeah, you must target the early adoptors, but targeting the early adoptors alone is not enough. You must make it usable for the average person.

(which is funny, because I've put almost zero effort into the usability of my product. I don't have a support budget, so if you don't know UNIX well, eh, for now I'm not the best product for you.)

Re: The Tale of a ‘Normal’ Person: A Reality Check

#17
I once tried to imagine what one of those people was thinking and i felt a strong vacuum in the right part of mi brain. I don't know if anyone of you was ever asked himself what makes these people different. Weren't we the different ones? These people are boring, they live in their own worlds. Thats probably exactly what they think of us :D We understand nerds problems because we are nerds and these problems are our own. But we don't understand normal peoples problems, because they are not our problems. Our best shot is at the common stuff(communication is the most common) In this case we are trapped. We can search for ordinary peoples problems and solve them with software, but those are not our problems and we don't understand them. How are we to know if we are not solving it wrongly? Or if we are solving a completely different problem in a really messed up way? So here is my best shot at it. Get a boring job, get married, have kids and get stupid. Have problems and then get smart again, get divorced and start working to solve the problem. Sounds ridiculous right? :D Boring people not always have boring problems, but they can seem boring if you don't understand them. Im sure average Joe thinks solving the problem with multi-core processors is boring too.

Re: The Tale of a ‘Normal’ Person: A Reality Check

#18
"Normal", in this sense just describes an imaginary HCD pseudo-human. There is no such thing. There was once a time when normal people didn't have computers, cell-phones, tv's, radios, cars, refrigerators... you get the idea.

Don't fear the niche, or the early adopter. Today's weird geek toy might be tomorrow's necessity.

Re: The Tale of a ‘Normal’ Person: A Reality Check

#20

I once tried to imagine what one of those people was thinking and i felt a strong vacuum in the right part of mi brain. I don't know if anyone of you was ever asked himself what makes these people different. Weren't we the different ones? These people are boring, they live in their own worlds. Thats probably exactly what they think of us :D We understand nerds problems because we are nerds and these problems are our…

If you have a way to make multi-core processors improve the speed of day-to-day tasks, then all the "average Joe" has to know if that it makes his computer faster. And because that's something that he does care about, you have a $100 million idea.

It's absurd to think that there are no real-world problems which have interesting solutions. To say that you can't understand what more "average" people would find useful is not an assertion of your superior intelligence, just an assertion that you're not particularly perceptive or curious.

Post reply on HN