So what's the main barrier to using these industrially? Is it reliability? Did this video a zillion takes? Is it manufacturing? Maybe it's hard to scale them up? Is it battery life? Maybe it can power itself for just a few minutes? Is it object manipulation or sensing/world understanding? Maybe it can't apply the right forces to a soft thing or a flexible thing or know what it can step on vs over or what will move or…
Do You Love Me? [video]
101–110 of 478 posts
Re: Do You Love Me? [video]
#102It's all fun and games until they install the guns on these things.
idk I'm kind of thinking you could play real-life fortnite with human-controlled robots like these... but then that reminds me of this scifi short movie: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1AvyUWUKCw8
Re: Do You Love Me? [video]
#103The way this breaks has everything to do with the lessons people have drawn from past mistakes with technology. It's an unsettling thought.
Re: Do You Love Me? [video]
#104I love how there were people in the upper floor just walking by without even looking. "Oh, the robots are dancing again." In between the advances in "holographic" displays (not quite as sci-fi as we would want, but they are progressing), commercial space flight, cybernetic prosthetics, CRISPR and this... we are living in the future. It's amazing. It makes me a little sad more people are not aware of the ridiculously…
Part of the reason the robots evoke little excitement is because after a short look, you can realize they're just large puppets. We've had dancing puppets like Walt Disney's Small World. The reason Boston Dynamics takes over paths and shows robots dancing with each other is their robots still generally can't interact with humans or the environment in an unstructured way. Unstructured, "soft" interaction seem pretty easy to us but might actually close to "AI complete" in their potential complexity.
In between the advances in "holographic" displays (not quite as sci-fi as we would want, but they are progressing), commercial space flight, cybernetic prosthetics, CRISPR and this... we are living in the future. It's amazing.
I think your list illustrates how there's a wide variation among technologies in the time from demonstration to implementation. I watched radio controlled boats go around lakes in 1970s. Hobby drones are just now becoming useful, forty years later. Jet packs have been around for a long time but you still can't use them without serious safety precautions and they still aren't a way people would commute.
Re: Do You Love Me? [video]
#105Re: Do You Love Me? [video]
#106 - No studio setup, just their lab
- No artificial lighting
- No fucks given about hiding the mess
- Robots going through surgery in the background
- Song is classy af IMO
- Can see the camera man
- Can see the engineers/employees
- Framing/cinematography isn't as polished (this is a feature, not a bug)
- Chipped paint, beaten up fairings
Generally, I love BD Branding/Marketing/PR: - Logo is on point. It's Da Vinci level stuff. Humanist
It is totally opposite of what they build, such an amazing contrast and deeply thought out [1]
- One or two videos per year
- No twitter drama like a lot of SV companies (Hey, Elon)
- No excessive trying to get their word out. Their products speak for themselves
- No purple/gradient bullshit and design trends
- Their job descriptions actually make sense of what they need from you
- Their CEO, Marc Raibert, exudes wisdom, calm and has a persona of composure (seriously, watch his interviews) [2]
- No AI hype
Literally the opposite of Silicon Valley. May be I've had too much coffee and making lofty generalizations, but this is what I see! I also see the DNA of East coast/MIT/Boston rigor vs Silicon Valley cowboys - thoughts? :-) I live and work in SV btw.I can't get over how amazing this video is. I hope it takes over the top spot on Youtube. It's got everything - music/tech/memes. The people behind BD marketing are geniuses IMO, although building an explosively-cool tech that appeals to all humans helps a lot. Outstanding.
Re: Do You Love Me? [video]
#107If I didn't know who Boston Dynamics was, I would have said that this is just CGI. The animations look so fake. I think the issue is that they're aggressively smoothing the motion since mechanical systems don't have the ability to accelerate & jerk as fast as biological systems. Cheap mocap animation has the same problem because the frame rate of the capture system is too low. They interpolate between captured keyfra…
Agree that if anyone except BD put out this video I’d bin it as fake immediately. I still have a hard time saying I believe it - it feels like such a jump from where my mental model of their robots was and CGI is so good at this point that it feels easier for this to be a fake than real.
Adam Savage: https://youtu.be/-R8wUybrspo?t=2374
Marques Brownlee: https://youtu.be/s6_azdBnAlU?t=249
Re: Do You Love Me? [video]
#108So what's the main barrier to using these industrially? Is it reliability? Did this video a zillion takes? Is it manufacturing? Maybe it's hard to scale them up? Is it battery life? Maybe it can power itself for just a few minutes? Is it object manipulation or sensing/world understanding? Maybe it can't apply the right forces to a soft thing or a flexible thing or know what it can step on vs over or what will move or…
Re: Do You Love Me? [video]
#109Earlier quoted context omitted.
I kind of wish there was a reason to be afraid, but I don’t think AI is anywhere near that.
We don't need to have full AI to have "death bots".