Live data from Hacker News

Dev-C++ Is a Low Memory Windows Native C++ IDE Built in Delphi

blogs.embarcadero.com

81–84 of 84 posts

Re: Dev-C++ Is a Low Memory Windows Native C++ IDE Built in Delphi

#81

Any particular reason why these two posts were rendered dead? ------- H_Pylori 1 hour ago [dead] [–] Back in the day, Dev-C++ was the ideal IDE for the C/C++ beginner. Simple, easy to use and very light in term of resources. I remember being able to run Dev-C++ on a 166Mhz Pentium I with 32Mb of RAM (which was hopelessly obsolete even by then). You could even install C libraries automatically as DevPaks. ------- ku-m…

First one is no longer dead so it was rescued. Second one doesn't add anything useful.

I am not sure if all these are manual or some sort of flag / downvoted automated process. But generally speaking it is doing a pretty good job.

Re: Dev-C++ Is a Low Memory Windows Native C++ IDE Built in Delphi

#83
post #58

I wonder what's the motivation behind this fork. Embarcadero is the company currently maintaining and selling Delphi dev tools. They also have their own commercial C++ IDE. Is it treated as demo App for their own toolchain.

> Embarcadero Dev-C++ has a low memory footprint because it is a native Windows application and does not use Electron. Seems like they're using it as a VS Code offering/counter.

Which is great, looking forward to have less Electron fat on my computer.

Re: Dev-C++ Is a Low Memory Windows Native C++ IDE Built in Delphi

#84
post #25

Earlier quoted context omitted.

How is it more hackable than VS?

I don't think Visual Studio is "hackable" at all. Are you thinking of Visual Studio Code? Aren't the two very different? The first is a very large and commercial Windows application written by Microsoft and the latter is a free/open-source IDE with numerous plugins written as an electron app.

I agree, VS isn't very much hackable, but, is Delphi any more hackable either?
Post reply on HN