Fujifilm Created a Magnetic Tape That Can Store 580 Terabytes

Tapes are uniquely terrible at this. I'd argue it's the Achilles' heel of the medium, even moreso than the actual limitations of linear tape.

First off, the drives themselves are going to be expensive brand-new. You're going to be paying thousands of dollars for a drive, and it's probably going to have some weird interconnect that you'll have to spend even more money and waste a PCIe slot on an adapter in order to use the drive. Most common is SAS or Fibre Channel; although there's at least one company selling drives in Thunderbolt enclosures for the Mac market.

(Aside from all that, SAS is actually pretty cool for things like hard drive enclosures, since it has SATA compatibility. I have a jury-rigged disk shelf built out of an old HP SAS expander, a slightly-modified CD duplicator case, and some 5 1/4" hard drive bays.)

Second, tape formats are constantly moving. LTO and IBM 3592 come out with a new format every 2-3 years and backwards compatibility is limited. Generally speaking you can only write one generation behind on LTO and read two generations back. So, if you want a format that's got drives still being made for it, you'll need to migrate every 5-7 years. Sure, the actual tape is shelf-stable for longer, but you're going to be buying spare drives or jumping on eBay if you want to keep old tapes around that long.

(eBay is actually not a bad place to buy used tape drives, but the pricing varies wildly. It's perfect for hobbyists and small-fry IT outfits looking for cheap backup media. Absolutely terrible if you're a large outfit with reliability guarantees and support agreements to maintain.)

Third, actually using a tape drive is a nightmare. First off, Windows hasn't shipped tape software since 2003 (I think?), so you'll be in the market for proprietary backup solutions. Second, if you're just writing data directly to the tape, you will shoe-shine for days. Common IT practice is to actually have a second disk array sitting in front of the tapes as a write cache and custom software to copy data to the tapes at full speed once all the slow nonsequential IO is done. Reading from tape doesn't have to worry about this as much, but the fact that you had to use custom software just to archive your files means that you now have proprietary archive formats to deal with. So you can have tapes that rely on both having access to working drives and licenses for proprietary backup utilities.

(Of course, if you had decently fast SSDs and a parallel archival utility, you could sustain decent write speeds on tape. I actually wrote this myself as an experiment: https://github.com/kmeisthax/rapidtar and it can saturate the LTO-5 drive I tested this with.)

Brings back memories of a great remix contest in 2006 where the digital copies of analog tape tracks from Peter Gabriel’s “Shock the Monkey” were made available to remixers.

To my surprise the pitch of the samples was a little lower (and varying ever so slightly over the duration of the song) than what you’d have expected with a440 tuning. It baffled me, since I expected some of the early digital synths used in the original sessions should habe been rock solid 440 tuning.

And that’s how I learned about “tape stretch” where analog audio tape stretches just enough to make the pitch of everything a few cents lower over long period of time.

p.s. I ended up applying digital pitch correction, so I could “jam along” with my own synths :-)

"Let me just surveillance out for a second"

Guess where this will have the biggest impact in the next decade - the long term storage of billions of personally invading surveillance data points forever...

Seriously, this tech will be abused. Against everyone. Facial recognition much? Zoom data? TikTok Data in a very compact physical form-factor?

Utah and China will LOVE this!

If you're flying back and forth on that route that often, you're going to get upgraded quickly, I would imagine. I've done 6 flights a month domestic and have been upgraded to first class for free fairly often.

Floppies are an interesting case because the protocols and physical specifications are all documented publicly, which means that one could literally build a drive from scratch today --- the trickiest part being the heads, but considering that they are many orders of magnitude lower density than HDDs, it would not be a big obstacle in the future.

(I believe 8" floppy drives have the same interface as 5.25" ones --- and there's no shortage of adapters from the retrocomputing community for those, some of them even open-source.)

Tape is far more closed, AFAIK most of the common formats are proprietary and the specs are behind NDAs and other walls.