Live data from Hacker News

FAA issuing new rules to allow drones to fly over people and at night

reuters.com

181–190 of 283 posts

Re: FAA issuing new rules to allow drones to fly over people and at night

#181
post #143

Earlier quoted context omitted.

What you need is a third drone...

Now you have three or more problems.

Reminds me of when Boyd Coddington went to Bonneville Salt Flats one year. Got his RV stuck, then got a tow truck stuck, then a 2nd and 3rd tow truck got stuck trying to recover them. Might have even taken a 4th tow truck to get them all out...

http://www.saltflats.com/stuck.htm

Re: FAA issuing new rules to allow drones to fly over people and at night

#182

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Now you have three or more problems.

Reminds me of when Boyd Coddington went to Bonneville Salt Flats one year. Got his RV stuck, then got a tow truck stuck, then a 2nd and 3rd tow truck got stuck trying to recover them. Might have even taken a 4th tow truck to get them all out... http://www.saltflats.com/stuck.htm

You can tell it's a road racing crowd and not an off road crowd based on the fact that the entire ground around the stuck vehicles isn't carpeted in tire tracks from other vehicles trying to get it unstuck and empty beer cans.

Re: FAA issuing new rules to allow drones to fly over people and at night

#183
post #132

Earlier quoted context omitted.

How do you keep the propellers from cutting people up? Does the parachute also tangle up the prop?

They aren’t sharp. Doesn’t seem like a realistic concern tbh.

Having driven someone to the ER from a drone accident, just because they're not "sharp" doesn't mean they won't cut straight through your arms, hands, or wrist if you touch them while they're landing. When the blades are going at ~10k RPM, it doesn't matter that they're made of plastic or whatever.

Re: FAA issuing new rules to allow drones to fly over people and at night

#184

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Being hit in the eye with a flying object spinning at high speeds...how much would it matter how sharp the blades are?

This comment thread is about someone adding a parachute to their drone if they lose power, so it doesn’t fall on someone. The propellers would not be spinning, and the object would be gently gliding down.

The drone’s blades would likely still be spinning during a parachute descent... albeit at lower revolutions per minute. I’d imagine drones operate like a helicopter: in the event of an engine failure, the helicopter goes into “autorotation” in which the now unpowered rotor blades move due to the air going through the blades as the helicopter descends, thus braking the fall. However, if drones have locking rotors, then in that case the blades would not be rotating during a parachute descent.

Regardless of whether the blades are locked or spinning at lower RPMs, still better than powered drones falling from the sky!

Re: FAA issuing new rules to allow drones to fly over people and at night

#185

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I am always stunned that many (most/all) of these high tech gadgets lack a LOT of safety features. I would pay extra for a drone with such safeguards. just the prospect of less chances of ruining it would be enough. Similarly, eskates often have a regenerative battery charging while braking which is a great idea. but it also cannot handle charging while already full. So if you go down a slope while the board is full,…

Teslas turn off regenerative breaking if you charge too far, but the car tells you that pretty prominently: however, the car handles very differently without Regen brakes.

Can’t you also set the car to never charge to actual max, giving regen breaking some leeway? (If this is somehow a problem you run into often)

Re: FAA issuing new rules to allow drones to fly over people and at night

#186
post #185

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Teslas turn off regenerative breaking if you charge too far, but the car tells you that pretty prominently: however, the car handles very differently without Regen brakes.

Can’t you also set the car to never charge to actual max, giving regen breaking some leeway? (If this is somehow a problem you run into often)

Yes, and that is the default. But people do charge to 100% occasionally for road trips (or for escaping a hurricane path, etc).

Re: FAA issuing new rules to allow drones to fly over people and at night

#187
post #132

Even though I don't fly over people, I retrofitted a parachute onto my DJI drone just in case. It automatically deploys if the drone loses power or control. It doesn't impact flight characteristics or battery life by much. I feel like a basic safety like this would be a prudent and more effective measure for overhead flights than self-transmitting "license plates" (which I agree are at least better than the silly int…

How do you keep the propellers from cutting people up? Does the parachute also tangle up the prop?

You can get propeller guards like so[1] to avoid them damaging something (or the blades themselves being damaged).

[1] https://m.dji.com/product/mini-2-360-propeller-guard

Re: FAA issuing new rules to allow drones to fly over people and at night

#188
post #6

What about changing the rules around commercial use of drone photography / videography? I don't understand why it's fine to use drones to take photos and videos for personal use, and why it's perfectly fine to use the smartphone in your hand for commercially-usable photos and videos, but combine the two and you suddenly have to get an FAA license? That requirement feels very arbitrary, and it feels like a requirement…

Because you can get drone photos from locations you would not have access to unless you were trespassing I hope buildings in future can implement some sort of electromagnetic area denial system for drones sort of like a robots.txt that drones have to respect (or active denial) and they can't cross some boundary like a airspace around the building so you can't have drones flying up to your windows in your 30th floor a…

yeah because all the bad actors totally follow robots.txt and they definitely don't use robots.txt to discover where hidden secrets might be

/s

Re: FAA issuing new rules to allow drones to fly over people and at night

#189

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I am always stunned that many (most/all) of these high tech gadgets lack a LOT of safety features. I would pay extra for a drone with such safeguards. just the prospect of less chances of ruining it would be enough. Similarly, eskates often have a regenerative battery charging while braking which is a great idea. but it also cannot handle charging while already full. So if you go down a slope while the board is full,…

Teslas turn off regenerative breaking if you charge too far, but the car tells you that pretty prominently: however, the car handles very differently without Regen brakes.

This was the dumbest thing I experienced with my Model 3. I was expecting my regen brakes to work after I pulled out and I had to brake super hard after.

Why can’t Tesla just give us an option to keep it consistent? I guess adding video games is more important.

Re: FAA issuing new rules to allow drones to fly over people and at night

#190

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Because you can get drone photos from locations you would not have access to unless you were trespassing I hope buildings in future can implement some sort of electromagnetic area denial system for drones sort of like a robots.txt that drones have to respect (or active denial) and they can't cross some boundary like a airspace around the building so you can't have drones flying up to your windows in your 30th floor a…

yeah because all the bad actors totally follow robots.txt and they definitely don't use robots.txt to discover where hidden secrets might be /s

ಥ_ಥ
Post reply on HN