Earlier quoted context omitted.
> Any sensible time handling solution will truncate instead of rounding. That doesn't really work for a countdown timer though since the last second would then display as zero, which is nonsense for 'time remaining'. You have to round up, always. The Android 9 countdown works intuitively, it takes a second to decrement from 5 to 4 and sounds the alarm exactly at 0. You can't pause it at zero... > Which is not to call…
I'll rewrite parent's statement to apply to timers and stopwatches: > Any sensible time handling solution will round off toward the starting value. So a stopwatch won't display "1" until a full second has elapsed, and will look like this for five seconds: "0...1...2...3...4...5!" A timer won't display "4" until a full second has elapsed, and will look like this: "5...4...3...2...1...0!" In the stopwatch case, the dis…
A stopwatch counts up. Therefore, it makes sense to use the floor (4.99 is still "4", not yet "5").
A timer counts down. Therefore, it makes sense to use the ceiling (3.01 is still "4", not yet "3").
In fact this was a turning point in the original article: "rounding down . . . makes a lot of sense when counting up. . . . But for a countdown timer, this is counterintuitive."