It's clear that their goal is to force Apple to acquire their patent portfolio. Clever trolls.
You say that but it's not just Apple that's being talked about - they've pointed out that Google and Microsoft have also licensed the technology and other large companies such as HP have been contacted about the fact that they haven't. This isn't an Apple issue, this is an industry wide issue. Apple owning the patent would make the issue go away for Apple but it might actually make it worse for other app stores (if A…
It’s only a few lines of code, or a button… pay up
11–20 of 42 posts
Re: It’s only a few lines of code, or a button… pay up
#12Earlier quoted context omitted.
Very true. I find it disturbing that they haven't already issued a statement about this - I would have thought they'd scramble to get out a statement saying that they're aware of the situation and are considering options.
Only in magical HN land do companies "scramble" to address issues like this. The best thing to do is to pretend these companies don't exist and you've never heard of them, their patents, or what they're up to. Once your patent lawyers have had time to study what's going on, then you're ready to do something. It's not "disturbing" at all. It's just common sense.
Re: It’s only a few lines of code, or a button… pay up
#13Earlier quoted context omitted.
It will take a year to reconsider. Apple needs to act quickly and aggressively on this to show the public and media that they stand behind the developers. They can't let the App Store become a feared, shady, legal-gibberish ecosystem.
Very true. I find it disturbing that they haven't already issued a statement about this - I would have thought they'd scramble to get out a statement saying that they're aware of the situation and are considering options.
The law (and lawyers) move slowly so I suspect it's going to be some time before they have anything useful and if you can't say anything useful why say anything at all?
Re: It’s only a few lines of code, or a button… pay up
#14Earlier quoted context omitted.
You say that but it's not just Apple that's being talked about - they've pointed out that Google and Microsoft have also licensed the technology and other large companies such as HP have been contacted about the fact that they haven't. This isn't an Apple issue, this is an industry wide issue. Apple owning the patent would make the issue go away for Apple but it might actually make it worse for other app stores (if A…
How would it look if Microsoft and Google stood up to "help" and fight for Apple just because Apple's app ecosystem has unresolved patent issues? Hypocritical as it is, obviously they will stay quiet, they want Apple to be troubled for their benefit.
If the guy is successful with Apple then it's inconceivable that they're not next so a little proactivity is probably the best way forward.
At the very least they should be putting together a strategy,
Re: It’s only a few lines of code, or a button… pay up
#15Earlier quoted context omitted.
You say that but it's not just Apple that's being talked about - they've pointed out that Google and Microsoft have also licensed the technology and other large companies such as HP have been contacted about the fact that they haven't. This isn't an Apple issue, this is an industry wide issue. Apple owning the patent would make the issue go away for Apple but it might actually make it worse for other app stores (if A…
Lodsys say that Apple, Microsoft and Google are "licensed", but they don't make clear whether those companies actually paid for a licence, or if they were granted it freely by Lodsys as part of a PR campaign to make them look bad for abandoning their developers.
They're patent trolls, they care about making money. If anything they'd want to avoid upsetting Apple because the minute Apple's legal and financial muscle gets involved things are a lot lot harder if you're Lodsys.
Re: It’s only a few lines of code, or a button… pay up
#16It's pretty hard to drill on someone else's land, use someone else's music in a production, or use someone else's logo without realizing it. Software patents are nothing like this.
Software patents would be more akin to it being patented for an oil company to drill with a very hard diamond bit, or a guitarist to hold their guitar a certain way during a solo, or perhaps a clothing manufacturer to wash their jeans for a more rugged look.
Maybe other industries do have patents like these, but I certainly never hear about them.
Re: It’s only a few lines of code, or a button… pay up
#17And right in the next paragraph...
"Many industries study the IP landscape prior to releasing a product or service and either design around or acquire necessary patent rights if they need them to do their solution."
So we need to hire lawyers to research whether we are inadvertently building on the ideas of others?
The patent trolls are now justifying patents by explaining exactly why they are unjustified.
Re: It’s only a few lines of code, or a button… pay up
#18Re: It’s only a few lines of code, or a button… pay up
#19> Oil companies do not drill on land where they don’t have the rights. Movies aren’t released that don’t clear all the music rights. Clothing manufacturers license logos from Disney or the NFL to include them in their product. It's pretty hard to drill on someone else's land, use someone else's music in a production, or use someone else's logo without realizing it. Software patents are nothing like this. Software pat…