Live data from Hacker News

Starship / Super Heavy

faa.gov

11–20 of 298 posts

Re: Starship / Super Heavy

#11

SpaceX's assembly and testing cadence is quite amazing. They're already putting together pieces of SN17!

In another article about Tesla VW CEO described them as having ‘essentially unlimited resources’. I guess spaceX probably falls under a similar category. Unlimited resources + not wasting ANYTHING is a killer combo.

Re: Starship / Super Heavy

#12

SpaceX's assembly and testing cadence is quite amazing. They're already putting together pieces of SN17!

In another article about Tesla VW CEO described them as having ‘essentially unlimited resources’. I guess spaceX probably falls under a similar category. Unlimited resources + not wasting ANYTHING is a killer combo.

I think many others also have 'essentially unlimited resources' but it is the execution and quick iteration that is unique to both Tesla and SpaceX.

Re: Starship / Super Heavy

#13

SpaceX's assembly and testing cadence is quite amazing. They're already putting together pieces of SN17!

In another article about Tesla VW CEO described them as having ‘essentially unlimited resources’. I guess spaceX probably falls under a similar category. Unlimited resources + not wasting ANYTHING is a killer combo.

Are you sure he wasn’t talking about Apple?

Re: Starship / Super Heavy

#14

Earlier quoted context omitted.

In another article about Tesla VW CEO described them as having ‘essentially unlimited resources’. I guess spaceX probably falls under a similar category. Unlimited resources + not wasting ANYTHING is a killer combo.

I think many others also have 'essentially unlimited resources' but it is the execution and quick iteration that is unique to both Tesla and SpaceX.

Lots of places seem like they should have unlimited resources. I would have thought VW would be pretty high on that list - but they have their resources tied up. SpaceX / Tesla seem to be more free to use their resources in daring ways.

Re: Starship / Super Heavy

#15
post #13

Earlier quoted context omitted.

In another article about Tesla VW CEO described them as having ‘essentially unlimited resources’. I guess spaceX probably falls under a similar category. Unlimited resources + not wasting ANYTHING is a killer combo.

Are you sure he wasn’t talking about Apple?

He said ‘other competitors’ or something like that and I assumed he meant Tesla despite it being at the time of Apple launch - building gigafactories takes a lot more resources than anything Apple has done so far. Word is Apple won’t even manufacture the whole car anyway like Tesla does.

Re: Starship / Super Heavy

#16

SpaceX's assembly and testing cadence is quite amazing. They're already putting together pieces of SN17!

In another article about Tesla VW CEO described them as having ‘essentially unlimited resources’. I guess spaceX probably falls under a similar category. Unlimited resources + not wasting ANYTHING is a killer combo.

> essentially unlimited resources

Both Tesla and SpaceX are welfare queens. So yes, they have infinite government resources to spend.

Re: Starship / Super Heavy

#17

Why the desalination plant? Is there not piped water? Is it just another eco friendly sounding thing to put in the plan? Is it to hedge against newspaper headlines saying how much water spacex is wasting? Desalination has to be more expensive than piped water (both financially and environmentally).

Easy on the SJW virtue signalling.

If you don't know what you're talking about, then don't talk.

OTOH, anything involving the Space Station or manned flight to Mars is a total waste of money, time and energy.

Re: Starship / Super Heavy

#18
An interesting thing here is SpaceX are building TWO launchpads. Which will definitely help prevent delays if an when there is an AMOS-6 [1] or Orb-3 [2] type explosion that destroys the launchpad.

It may also help for rapidly testing orbital refueling in 2022, though the plan is to do orbital refueling with 1 launch pad, 1 Super Heavy and 2 Starships (1 standard, 1 refueler) with 1 hour turnaround times between launches (and 5-6 launches) before Starship is ready to depart for the journey to Mars.

[1] https://youtu.be/_BgJEXQkjNQ?t=71

[2] https://youtu.be/aL5eddt-iAo?t=52

Re: Starship / Super Heavy

#19

Why the desalination plant? Is there not piped water? Is it just another eco friendly sounding thing to put in the plan? Is it to hedge against newspaper headlines saying how much water spacex is wasting? Desalination has to be more expensive than piped water (both financially and environmentally).

The site has extensive solar power, I'm not aware of environmental concerns for solar-powered desalination.

I would guess that it is driven by a real need for water and a hedge against environmental assessment difficulties.

Re: Starship / Super Heavy

#20
post #8

Why the desalination plant? Is there not piped water? Is it just another eco friendly sounding thing to put in the plan? Is it to hedge against newspaper headlines saying how much water spacex is wasting? Desalination has to be more expensive than piped water (both financially and environmentally).

It may be that they need too much for the local water company. During launches, they need to spray water- a lot of it. Using salt water would probably be problematic. Lots of residue left over.

Salt water is also corrosive.
Post reply on HN