Earlier quoted context omitted.
I agree that this is definitely a trend, so I feel like highlighting a great example of educational content that is very dense, concise, and with just a touch of whimsy: 3Blue1Brown on Youtube[0]. He has been doing math education videos on YouTube for years. I just watched his latest video on the medical test paradox and redesigning the Bayes rule to address it[1]. All his videos are absolutely phenomenal - the best…
No need to highlight this here. 99% of HN readers know 3b1b
1937 film explains how a car differential works
71–80 of 148 posts
Re: 1937 film explains how a car differential works
#72The style in those old films is so relaxing and pedagogically great. Has anyone else noticed that today's educational content intended for adults increasingly uses a format that was regionally only used for very young children? There is almost always personality emoting and doing accidentally on purpose funny things and laughing, exaggerating everything to keep people engaged.
Re: 1937 film explains how a car differential works
#73Re: 1937 film explains how a car differential works
#74Earlier quoted context omitted.
Having 1937 next to the name of any modern day company would imply such.
Not really, there are plenty of companies founded before 1937 that still exist
Re: 1937 film explains how a car differential works
#75How would films like this be consumed in the 30’s? Would it be shown in theaters before a feature film?
Re: 1937 film explains how a car differential works
#76Earlier quoted context omitted.
I agree that this is definitely a trend, so I feel like highlighting a great example of educational content that is very dense, concise, and with just a touch of whimsy: 3Blue1Brown on Youtube[0]. He has been doing math education videos on YouTube for years. I just watched his latest video on the medical test paradox and redesigning the Bayes rule to address it[1]. All his videos are absolutely phenomenal - the best…
No need to highlight this here. 99% of HN readers know 3b1b
The down votes are likely due to that as the comment does not contribute to much. If folks don’t want to hear more about 3b1b, it will just not gather upvotes.
Re: 1937 film explains how a car differential works
#77Re: 1937 film explains how a car differential works
#78The style in those old films is so relaxing and pedagogically great. Has anyone else noticed that today's educational content intended for adults increasingly uses a format that was regionally only used for very young children? There is almost always personality emoting and doing accidentally on purpose funny things and laughing, exaggerating everything to keep people engaged.
And to keep videos above a certain length so that the algorithm prefers them over short, concise videos, and that the chance is higher for multiple ad rolls (= more monetization).
Re: 1937 film explains how a car differential works
#79Earlier quoted context omitted.
I agree that this is definitely a trend, so I feel like highlighting a great example of educational content that is very dense, concise, and with just a touch of whimsy: 3Blue1Brown on Youtube[0]. He has been doing math education videos on YouTube for years. I just watched his latest video on the medical test paradox and redesigning the Bayes rule to address it[1]. All his videos are absolutely phenomenal - the best…
No need to highlight this here. 99% of HN readers know 3b1b
Re: 1937 film explains how a car differential works
#80The style in those old films is so relaxing and pedagogically great. Has anyone else noticed that today's educational content intended for adults increasingly uses a format that was regionally only used for very young children? There is almost always personality emoting and doing accidentally on purpose funny things and laughing, exaggerating everything to keep people engaged.
Person-to-person interactions have changed dramatically since those days. Western culture had a sense of duty and progress that is now questioned by the postmodern intellectual elites. The emphasis today is on "enjoying yourself" in your own bubble, and debating "grand moral standards" is even ridiculed.