Live data from Hacker News

Comic Mono

dtinth.github.io

121–130 of 220 posts

Re: Comic Mono

#121
post #118

Earlier quoted context omitted.

They’re clearly not “normal” if most fonts don’t have them (as default glyphs; many fonts have them as alternates).

By "normal" he means the glyph we are taught to write by hand, which is also the glyph young children are taught to identify individual letters.

Yes, my point was that that is a very narrow view of “normal”.

Re: Comic Mono

#122
post #90
post #86

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I've always been quite irritated by the amount of disdain toward Comic Sans. Partly because I feel like this is such an easy target, and people who have just learned 2 or 3 things about typography are very keen on bashing Comic Sans to show off their newly acquired knowledge. Partly because, let's face it, it's not that bad. What it does, it does well, it's pretty legible, no glyph stands out from the general harmony…

Comic Sans is the Britney Spears of fonts. Overused/Overplayed. Legible/Catchy. Well crafted for its original purpose. Gets no respect. Probably deserves a little, but it makes you feel dirty to give it.

This would explain why the discourse around it is so toxic.

Re: Comic Mono

#124
post #24

Comic Sans and its descendants are... indestructible . No matter how much some font designers complain about it, and how often they criticize it, Comic Sans keeps coming back, like the Terminator: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comic_Sans#Reception_and_use_i... Among the most incongruous uses of Comic Sans I've seen, a few stand out: * A plaque on a large statue of a historical figure in a public space: https://www.bi…

I truly don't understand why. Are people just that sick of Times New Roman and Calibri? It's not like I especially hate Comic Sans, but it seems so wildly inappropriate for all of the uses mentioned above.

Isn't it weird that there's a and a?

Re: Comic Mono

#126
post #42

Earlier quoted context omitted.

SNL did a funny skit on Papyrus: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jVhlJNJopOQ

For anyone who hasn't watched the above, please watch it. I truly believe it's one of SNL's best pieces of comedy. So incredibly well done.

That is funny.

Re: Comic Mono

#127
post #75

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> inappropriate for all the uses mentioned above... I'll raise you. See Papyrus. [1] Who needs "'I'd rather be golfing' on a t-shirt in Papyrus, of all fonts? [1] https://www.instagram.com/papyrus_forever/?hl=en

You probably have seen it but for anyone who hasn't, this SNL skit on Papyrus is brilliant: https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=jVhlJNJopOQ

Ha. I actually hadn’t. Nice.

Re: Comic Mono

#128
post #118

Earlier quoted context omitted.

They’re clearly not “normal” if most fonts don’t have them (as default glyphs; many fonts have them as alternates).

By "normal" he means the glyph we are taught to write by hand, which is also the glyph young children are taught to identify individual letters.

I personally write, and have seen many others use as well, the "two-storey" a and g, so I suspect there's regional variation.

Re: Comic Mono

#129
post #32

I once worked with a guy who wrote everything in Comic Sans - despite being counseled about it repeatedly. Fonts set a "tone" to your writing, and while Comic Sans if maybe fine for inviting people to in impromptu office pizza party, it represents yourself poorly in a professional environment. Here's some examples of how inappropriate some of his emails were (all real): - Contract negotiations - HR issues - Announcin…

Font "representing one poorly in a professional environment" sounds to me pretty much the same as insisting on strict dress code, banning facial hair, black or traditional hairstyles, etc.

Re: Comic Mono

#130

Not really a criticism and just an observation, but you can tell this page was written by a programmer because the section called "What does it look like?" is about what the code looks like, not the font itself. I realize the page's text is in the font, but often there's a sample that shows what all the common characters look like and in different variations (like regular and bold). Which is what I expected when I re…

I mean, if I'm looking for a monospace font, I'm probably either in a terminal or writing some code. If I'm trying to create a beautiful document, I'll probably use some variably-spaced thing inside LaTeX or something. I think showing me a big sample of code is genuinely the most useful way for me to get a "feel" for how the font is going to perform.
Post reply on HN