Live data from Hacker News

Comic Mono

dtinth.github.io

111–120 of 220 posts

Re: Comic Mono

#111
post #24

Comic Sans and its descendants are... indestructible . No matter how much some font designers complain about it, and how often they criticize it, Comic Sans keeps coming back, like the Terminator: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comic_Sans#Reception_and_use_i... Among the most incongruous uses of Comic Sans I've seen, a few stand out: * A plaque on a large statue of a historical figure in a public space: https://www.bi…

That third one isn't too surprising

Re: Comic Mono

#112

I actually... don’t mind it? What is wrong with me

I'm also here with you. I don't get the issue. I know some fonts are more easily readable than others. I can understand the argument that maybe some fonts cause more strain than others. But there are other commenters who are saying that this font type is evoking emotions from them, particularly negative emotional ones. I don't get it.

Like music or art, I think that one starts to see, and appreciate, nuances as one learns and experiences more. If you’re drawn to the beauty and nuance of fonts, you start to develop preferences and appreciations for details. If you’re simply utilitarian in your font use (which is perfectly fine, of course), you probably don’t care about much beyond legibility. I find some fonts aesthetically beautiful, and some awful (Comic Sans is in the middle for me, though closer to awful), but I don’t expect others to share my tastes: I like jazz and filling out tax forms, too.

Re: Comic Mono

#113

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I truly don't understand why. Are people just that sick of Times New Roman and Calibri? It's not like I especially hate Comic Sans, but it seems so wildly inappropriate for all of the uses mentioned above.

> inappropriate for all the uses mentioned above... I'll raise you. See Papyrus. [1] Who needs "'I'd rather be golfing' on a t-shirt in Papyrus, of all fonts? [1] https://www.instagram.com/papyrus_forever/?hl=en

Some of these aren't that bad. I think once you get past five letters in a row or start adding apostrophes, it's time to use something else. A couple letters with some customization can work though, e.g. I don't think the Lamb of God logo is bad.

Re: Comic Mono

#114
post #88

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> inappropriate for all the uses mentioned above... I'll raise you. See Papyrus. [1] Who needs "'I'd rather be golfing' on a t-shirt in Papyrus, of all fonts? [1] https://www.instagram.com/papyrus_forever/?hl=en

Papyrus just reminds me of how little selection there is in the default fonts on Mac OS X. I mean, there could be so much more.

At least there's actually Helvetica!

Re: Comic Mono

#115
post #24

Comic Sans and its descendants are... indestructible . No matter how much some font designers complain about it, and how often they criticize it, Comic Sans keeps coming back, like the Terminator: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comic_Sans#Reception_and_use_i... Among the most incongruous uses of Comic Sans I've seen, a few stand out: * A plaque on a large statue of a historical figure in a public space: https://www.bi…

* A hate letter from owner of Cleveland Cavaliers to Lebron James

http://www.cnn.com/2010/TECH/web/07/09/comic.sans.cavs.james...

Re: Comic Mono

#117
post #32

I once worked with a guy who wrote everything in Comic Sans - despite being counseled about it repeatedly. Fonts set a "tone" to your writing, and while Comic Sans if maybe fine for inviting people to in impromptu office pizza party, it represents yourself poorly in a professional environment. Here's some examples of how inappropriate some of his emails were (all real): - Contract negotiations - HR issues - Announcin…

I still think it shouldn't be possible to change the font for emails. 80-chars-wide monospaced whatever-your-terminal-offers is good enough.

Re: Comic Mono

#118
post #86

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I've always been quite irritated by the amount of disdain toward Comic Sans. Partly because I feel like this is such an easy target, and people who have just learned 2 or 3 things about typography are very keen on bashing Comic Sans to show off their newly acquired knowledge. Partly because, let's face it, it's not that bad. What it does, it does well, it's pretty legible, no glyph stands out from the general harmony…

i made reading cards for my kids in comic sans because it’s one of the few fonts with the normal lower case a and g

They’re clearly not “normal” if most fonts don’t have them (as default glyphs; many fonts have them as alternates).

Re: Comic Mono

#119
post #118

Earlier quoted context omitted.

i made reading cards for my kids in comic sans because it’s one of the few fonts with the normal lower case a and g

They’re clearly not “normal” if most fonts don’t have them (as default glyphs; many fonts have them as alternates).

By "normal" he means the glyph we are taught to write by hand, which is also the glyph young children are taught to identify individual letters.

Re: Comic Mono

#120

There's something very pleasing about the monospacing with this particular font. Font people-- any idea why I would enjoy the aesthetics of the monospaced version so much more than the old variable-width version?

I totally agree with you. I’m no fan of Comic Sans, but monospaced it’s really quite nice. I think Comic Shanns does things like set all the characters on the baseline, eliminate goofy tilting, etc. The letter shapes themselves are nice.

> I think Comic Shanns does things like set all the characters on the baseline, eliminate goofy tilting, etc.

I think this is the biggest trick. I'm no font expert, but my understanding is that the base of Comic Sans is fine, it's just that there are so many small "errors" [0] that make it a pain to look at.

[0] Many of which had perfectly valid reasons for the time.

Post reply on HN