Live data from Hacker News

Open Source Stash – Privacy-focused, powerful, secure open-source alternatives

opensourcestash.com

41–50 of 66 posts

Re: Open Source Stash – Privacy-focused, powerful, secure open-source alternatives

#41
post #38
post #28

I don’t see any alternatives to social networks like Facebook / LinkedIn here, the same way that Wordpress is an alternative to medium.com How do we submit here our open source platform https://github.com/Qbix/Platform

Diaspora and Mastodon (among others) are there fwiw.

Those are kind of like basic twitter clones

Re: Open Source Stash – Privacy-focused, powerful, secure open-source alternatives

#42

Open Source Stash seems to be opinionated (for lack of a better word) and there doesn't seem to be a way to submit projects to it in the public (like a pull-request for example where a discussion can be had) but only privately to the maintainer (ironic, for a webpage maintaining a collection of OSS software)? Also, I need to allow countless third-party services (uMatrix puts the count at 51) to even make the website…

they list brave, but not firefox! I take offense to that! :)

Re: Open Source Stash – Privacy-focused, powerful, secure open-source alternatives

#43

Why is there pretty much no active participant in the open source software for lawyers, accountants? And no. Kanban does not count. Is the monopoly of stuff like Clio and others so much that noone is attempting open source alternatives? Cliniccases which has seen no development in years seems to be only one. When you can have accounting packages and ERP software for million dollar orgs running on Foss software like e…

I used to be a consultant, a lot of our clients were lawyers.

We talked a lot about gaps in the market, but when talking to our clients, they really were not interested in anything that didn't come from a largish vendor. Compliance, liability and the belief that somehow the people writing it should also have passed the bar were frequently mentioned.

Those folks will never run something they pulled off Github.

Re: Open Source Stash – Privacy-focused, powerful, secure open-source alternatives

#45
post #26

Why is there pretty much no active participant in the open source software for lawyers, accountants? And no. Kanban does not count. Is the monopoly of stuff like Clio and others so much that noone is attempting open source alternatives? Cliniccases which has seen no development in years seems to be only one. When you can have accounting packages and ERP software for million dollar orgs running on Foss software like e…

“IANAL” and all, My take is that legal work is, and has been, a high status domain of knowledge work requiring skill, effort and hard work to aquire. What cannot be solved with Excel&friends, may not be suited for such tools (or so they argue, to safeguard their knowledge). A highly competitive market keep firms from collaborating on common [open source] goals and processes. Firms may have value systems far apart in…

billion dollar companies are built on providing service to a foss project that has been battle tested to work. its not like that is too far fetched.

what you are saying is network effect is helping companies not allowing a foss competitor because that would cut into their bottom line?

so, i am offering my inputs. all the legal clinics around the world who need software for their day to day management who currently rely on google sheets and excel would love a foss alternative. self hosted would work for them.

the stuff used in house is probably not supposed to be known to your customers/competitors so network effect is out.

remember. tools dont need safeguarding. the knowledge inside does.

Re: Open Source Stash – Privacy-focused, powerful, secure open-source alternatives

#47
post #43

Why is there pretty much no active participant in the open source software for lawyers, accountants? And no. Kanban does not count. Is the monopoly of stuff like Clio and others so much that noone is attempting open source alternatives? Cliniccases which has seen no development in years seems to be only one. When you can have accounting packages and ERP software for million dollar orgs running on Foss software like e…

I used to be a consultant, a lot of our clients were lawyers. We talked a lot about gaps in the market, but when talking to our clients, they really were not interested in anything that didn't come from a largish vendor. Compliance, liability and the belief that somehow the people writing it should also have passed the bar were frequently mentioned. Those folks will never run something they pulled off Github.

if https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/OpenEMR can be hipaa compliant, so can other softwares be. i don't think being on github is some sort of "childish" thing to say.

you said your clients were lawyers. my question, how "big" were your clients? were they shoe string budgeted legal clinics, one man pratices or medium/large multi corps?

compliance and liability is talked about stuff which is usually customer facing, has some cloud version that might be stealing data and all that. There is little problems in running offline self hosted solutions that only reside in the local network and "for your eyes only" end to end.

Re: Open Source Stash – Privacy-focused, powerful, secure open-source alternatives

#48

Open Source Stash seems to be opinionated (for lack of a better word) and there doesn't seem to be a way to submit projects to it in the public (like a pull-request for example where a discussion can be had) but only privately to the maintainer (ironic, for a webpage maintaining a collection of OSS software)? Also, I need to allow countless third-party services (uMatrix puts the count at 51) to even make the website…

Another list https://alternativeshub.gitlab.io/ with the rankings. Found Photopea here. Seems to be based on the awesome list too.

Note that while Photopea is free to use, it is neither open source, nor source available. It’s free to use (free as in beer) proprietary software.

Not to say Photopea isn’t fantastic (it is!), but in the context of this thread (open source software) it may not be suitable for many.

Re: Open Source Stash – Privacy-focused, powerful, secure open-source alternatives

#49

Open Source Stash seems to be opinionated (for lack of a better word) and there doesn't seem to be a way to submit projects to it in the public (like a pull-request for example where a discussion can be had) but only privately to the maintainer (ironic, for a webpage maintaining a collection of OSS software)? Also, I need to allow countless third-party services (uMatrix puts the count at 51) to even make the website…

> Also, I need to allow countless third-party services (uMatrix puts the count at 51) to even make the website work.

Here I am with Firefox Focus staring at an almost blank page (except for three page links) because of content and tracker blockers. I usually don’t even bother to explore further in such cases.

Re: Open Source Stash – Privacy-focused, powerful, secure open-source alternatives

#50

Open Source Stash seems to be opinionated (for lack of a better word) and there doesn't seem to be a way to submit projects to it in the public (like a pull-request for example where a discussion can be had) but only privately to the maintainer (ironic, for a webpage maintaining a collection of OSS software)? Also, I need to allow countless third-party services (uMatrix puts the count at 51) to even make the website…

"Also, I need to allow countless third-party services (uMatrix puts the at 51) to even make the website work."

This "website" is nothing more than a spreadsheet transformed into a dumpster fire of gratuitous Javascript and third party requests with https://spreadsimple.com.

https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1CwEoXiapYtYiU5TvYrVs...

For the raw XML,

https://doc-10-7k-sheets.googleusercontent.com/export/l5l039...

Need to remove HTTP headers and chunking, then unzip.

Post reply on HN