Was there some dispute I didn't hear about? I'm pretty sure everyone knows that MIT is pretty great. Did Gates just copy-paste info from the recruitment packet? I suspect that if this was not written by Bill Gates, it would have never made it to the front page of HN.
people would up-vote a bowel movement if "MIT" was in the title.
Bill Gates: Why MIT matters
11–20 of 41 posts
Re: Bill Gates: Why MIT matters
#12If you're a nerdy high schooler: Don't let that be you.
Re: Bill Gates: Why MIT matters
#13Earlier quoted context omitted.
It reminds me of a Point/Counterpoint from The Onion: "Why MIT Matters", by Bill Gates vs "MIT Sucks and Everyone Who Goes There Is A Huge Fag, lol" by A First-Year Engineering Undergrad at Caltech
Sad that we can't take time - even just a moment - to appreciate nice things. Is the default really to assume a conflict? It's like the internet really is a fifteen year old - highly opinionated and easily slighted. I've been affiliated with MIT for three years. I hope to never leave. I wish I appreciated education as a kid and I might have arrived much sooner.
Now it's mainly a communication tool for 13 year olds and desperate housewives.
Re: Bill Gates: Why MIT matters
#14Earlier quoted context omitted.
Sad that we can't take time - even just a moment - to appreciate nice things. Is the default really to assume a conflict? It's like the internet really is a fifteen year old - highly opinionated and easily slighted. I've been affiliated with MIT for three years. I hope to never leave. I wish I appreciated education as a kid and I might have arrived much sooner.
The internet used to be cool. It was full of smart people saying smart things. Now it's mainly a communication tool for 13 year olds and desperate housewives.
If someone sat next to me on an airplane, heard me mention MIT, then waxed eloquent for an hour, I'd be nodding along with a big grin. Contrast that with me asking if MIT was involved in a conflict or if the speaker wanted a donation. It would make no sense.
So why do we allow and enable that attitude online, especially here at HN? It's not just mean, it's vapid.
Re: Bill Gates: Why MIT matters
#15Re: Bill Gates: Why MIT matters
#16I wish I had had the cojones to apply to MIT when I was looking at undergraduate schools. I was afraid I was too fail, and I was terrified of the debt I'd accrue. Today, I think I could have made a competitive attempt to get in. If you're a nerdy high schooler: Don't let that be you.
Re: Bill Gates: Why MIT matters
#17Re: Bill Gates: Why MIT matters
#18I wish I had had the cojones to apply to MIT when I was looking at undergraduate schools. I was afraid I was too fail, and I was terrified of the debt I'd accrue. Today, I think I could have made a competitive attempt to get in. If you're a nerdy high schooler: Don't let that be you.
Not that state schools are much cheaper these days, but do you really think it's good advice to suggest accumulating 200K+ in debt to get an undergrad degree?
Re: Bill Gates: Why MIT matters
#19Was there some dispute I didn't hear about? I'm pretty sure everyone knows that MIT is pretty great. Did Gates just copy-paste info from the recruitment packet? I suspect that if this was not written by Bill Gates, it would have never made it to the front page of HN.
It reminds me of a Point/Counterpoint from The Onion: "Why MIT Matters", by Bill Gates vs "MIT Sucks and Everyone Who Goes There Is A Huge Fag, lol" by A First-Year Engineering Undergrad at Caltech
Re: Bill Gates: Why MIT matters
#20Earlier quoted context omitted.
Sad that we can't take time - even just a moment - to appreciate nice things. Is the default really to assume a conflict? It's like the internet really is a fifteen year old - highly opinionated and easily slighted. I've been affiliated with MIT for three years. I hope to never leave. I wish I appreciated education as a kid and I might have arrived much sooner.
The internet used to be cool. It was full of smart people saying smart things. Now it's mainly a communication tool for 13 year olds and desperate housewives.
Yeah, maybe in 1992. For all practical purposes, the quality of Internet discussions been at its current state for the past two decades. Complaining about it won't make it any better.